![]() | |
| |||||||
| Register | iSpy | Wiki | All Albums | gXboxLive | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums! | |
| This is the place to discuss everything related to Top Gear, Fifth Gear, and more! However, to gain full access to these forums, you will need to register. As a registered member, you will be able to:
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or logging into your account, you can contact us. Already have an account? Login to the upper-right to hide this message and all advertisements on the forums. | |
| Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill Discussion of new cars on the market, concept cars, prototypes, spy shots, etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #21 | |
| Quote:
6 diffrent popular pickup-trucks from Nissan, Mazda, Ford. Izuzu, Mitsubishi and Toyota. They are testing them at a speed of 57 km/h (a normal car should clear that test in 70hm/h). The toyota didn't have anykind of esp and had a "bad design", The testers felt that the car shouldn't be allowed to be sold. Then the guy in the interview goes on about the design of the rear of the truck and that the others starts to drift, but the toyota wont do that. Instead it grips and falls over. Then he goes on about this kind of vehicle is usually driven by ppl who needs them for work, but as ppl use them for everyday crap like going shopping they are driven like a normal car, and therefor needs to behave like a normal car.. Toyota said that they couldn't understand why the car behaved liked this and they are investigating how and why... It's a crappy translation but I think you get the point.. And atleast toyota didn't blame the test and the driver like BMW did a few years ago.. ![]() And btw: The other 5 trucks passed just fine..
__________________ | ||
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Joined: Dec 11th, 2006 Last Online: Yesterday Location: Manhattan, Kansas Posts: 2,462
Car: '82 S10, '74 Yamaha, '74 Honda Rep Power: 28 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
I know what you're saying, but if you hit anything with a truck, brush guard or not, you're going to do some damage. Well saying that just makes their engineers sound like idiots. The engineers know exactly why the truck flips; it's got a high center of gravity (it's a truck, duh), and doesn't have any driving aids to save those who swerve and flip when they should've just hit the deer. If I was in the engineering department at Toyota that really would make me mad. | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| The engineer were idiots.. The other trucks in that test and every other truck they've tested passed just fine..
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Joined: Dec 11th, 2006 Last Online: Yesterday Location: Manhattan, Kansas Posts: 2,462
Car: '82 S10, '74 Yamaha, '74 Honda Rep Power: 28 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Bah, you think it flips because the engineers don't give a shit? No, it flips because some bean counter decided stability control was too expensive. Or the suspension design was compromised in the name of aesthetics or increasing payload. I've never met an engineer who wanted his name on something "faulty". |
| | |
| | #25 |
| ^Good point.. But this is something that never should have happened.. So it does make Toyota look like idiots.. But they are not trying to deny it like BMW did...
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Joined: Feb 1st, 2007 Last Online: 12:05 AM Location: Dallas, Texas USA Age: 32 Posts: 3,609
Car: 87 XJ6, 95 XJR, 90 WD21, 86 CB700SC Rep Power: 57 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
![]()
__________________ ![]() 1986 Honda Nighthawk 700S (project, light restoration in progress) 1987 Jaguar XJ6 Series III Vanden Plas (modified) 1990 Nissan (WD21) Pathfinder SE 4x4 (little red offroad commuter box) 1995 Jaguar (X300) XJR (modified) My truck can swim the English Channel; what can yours do? It's just another day / Where people cling to light / To drive away the fear / That comes with every night | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| I think I'd rather flip the car than running it into a moose. It might work on smaller animals, but the moose weighs between 350-450 kg on an average, stands up to 2.3 meters and has some very thin legs. It's as if they were made to come crashing through the windscreen of any regular car, and I doubt that a truck would make that much of a difference. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Joined: Jan 13th, 2005 Last Online: Yesterday Location: Perth, WA Age: 27 Posts: 2,000
Car: BMW E46 328Ci Rep Power: 25 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | We don't call them Rolluxes here in Australia for nothing. The old one was even worse; we have a 2003 model on skinny tyres, and I don't feel safe cornering above 60km/h in it.
__________________ Remember, a dog is not just for Christmas. It can also be for a birthday. In fact, you can eat them all year round! |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| D: | Quote:
Yeah but how fast were the cayenne's going, it would be a popular vechicle to showboat in I imagine.
__________________ My car is dark grey not black! | |
| | |
| | #31 |
| Joined: Nov 5th, 2007 Last Online: December 28th, 2008 Location: CHI IL Posts: 16
Car: NIS Frontier Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Bottom line, Jap pick-ups are the best vehicles on Earth. If your dumb enough to roll one you deserve what fate serves you. I have driven Nissan And Toy pick-ups for over a decade and never even remotely got near to rolling one. Only a numb-nut auto-pundit could do it... foolish twats.
__________________ I believe that if you get nothing but positive feedback, your absolutely useless. Those who stay at zero at least express themselves, who the fuck wants to agree all day? |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Ive put my Hilux through worse than that and its never rolled or even been remotley close to going over. Also that model doesn't have stability control which compounds the problem where as the Mitsubushi, i believe, does. Last edited by WellsieTRD; November 13th, 2007 at 06:57 AM.. | |
| | |
| | #33 | ||
| Joined: Dec 11th, 2006 Last Online: Yesterday Location: Manhattan, Kansas Posts: 2,462
Car: '82 S10, '74 Yamaha, '74 Honda Rep Power: 28 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
. Anyway, I was just listing a few things that could potentially help. It's still a truck, it's still got a high center of gravity and less than ideal suspension; no one should be surprised it rolls. | ||
| | |
| | #34 |
| Joined: Feb 1st, 2007 Last Online: 12:05 AM Location: Dallas, Texas USA Age: 32 Posts: 3,609
Car: 87 XJ6, 95 XJR, 90 WD21, 86 CB700SC Rep Power: 57 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Yup, that's the "super safe, super stable" loaded with every-safety-and-stability-aid-known-to-man Volvo XC90 going on its roof in a rollover test.
__________________ ![]() 1986 Honda Nighthawk 700S (project, light restoration in progress) 1987 Jaguar XJ6 Series III Vanden Plas (modified) 1990 Nissan (WD21) Pathfinder SE 4x4 (little red offroad commuter box) 1995 Jaguar (X300) XJR (modified) My truck can swim the English Channel; what can yours do? It's just another day / Where people cling to light / To drive away the fear / That comes with every night |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Yes, it's probably the rollover test they do by flipping it on purpose to check how strong the safety cage is when it rolls over. Volvo has been doing this with all of their cars for a long time now. As you can see from the car's colour it's a crash test vehicle, not a production car lent to a car magazine for a test, that's a big difference.
__________________ Wenn ist das Nunstruck geht und Slottermeier? Ja. Beierhund das Oder, die Flipperwald gespürt! Greetings from Norway... I miss Texas already... | |
| | |
| | #36 | |||
| ^As Eirik already pointed out that XC90 is a test vehicle and it's thrown sideways.. And there is no driver in that picture..
__________________ | ||||
| | | |||
| | #37 | |
| Joined: Feb 11th, 2007 Last Online: December 20th, 2008 Location: Finland Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Joined: Feb 1st, 2007 Last Online: 12:05 AM Location: Dallas, Texas USA Age: 32 Posts: 3,609
Car: 87 XJ6, 95 XJR, 90 WD21, 86 CB700SC Rep Power: 57 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | North American White Tailed Deer aren't 80 lbs. They're 2-300lbs. And we also have elk and moose over here. What you call Elk, we call a Moose. And, for that matter, this is why we drive trucks with grille guards. This is what happens when a moose hits a car: ![]() This is what happens when a moose hits a pickup (with no bull bars): And here's what happens if you swerve to avoid a moose and crash instead. ![]() I think I'd rather hit the moose with my truck, thanks.
__________________ ![]() 1986 Honda Nighthawk 700S (project, light restoration in progress) 1987 Jaguar XJ6 Series III Vanden Plas (modified) 1990 Nissan (WD21) Pathfinder SE 4x4 (little red offroad commuter box) 1995 Jaguar (X300) XJR (modified) My truck can swim the English Channel; what can yours do? It's just another day / Where people cling to light / To drive away the fear / That comes with every night |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Banned | i have done quick maneuvers in my Moms Silverado. Mainly avoiding a large accident all of a sudden, and thankfully, that truck got 5 star raitng for a truck and rolling over. Very planted. Those little small trucks are so narrow and tall, i would be doing no major swerving in it. |
| | |
| | #40 |
| | |
| | |