![]() | |
| |||||||
| Register | iSpy | Wiki | All Albums | gXboxLive | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums! | |
| This is the place to discuss everything related to Top Gear, Fifth Gear, and more! However, to gain full access to these forums, you will need to register. As a registered member, you will be able to:
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or logging into your account, you can contact us. Already have an account? Login to the upper-right to hide this message and all advertisements on the forums. | |
| Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill Discussion of new cars on the market, concept cars, prototypes, spy shots, etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 | |
![]() ![]() Quote:
Source After nearly ten years, and countless awards and acclaim, Honda's finally thinking about a successor to the S2000. They had better not stuff it up, lol. The concept looks very good, and I'm interested to see which engine Honda does choose to implement in the car. | ||
| | |
| | #2 |
| Joined: Mar 16th, 2008 Last Online: 11:22 PM Location: 38°43'13.19"S, 77°31'47.87"E Age: 33 Posts: 235
Car: Grand Cherokee (for now) Rep Power: 13 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I remember back before the S2000 came out it was originally going to be named the SSX and come with an inline-5. I couldn't have cared less about the name, but I still think a 5 cylinder is worth looking into. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Hmmmm S3000 = 3.0L V6? It could be an interesting concept, though it is hard to imagine the sucessor of this roadster to have such a big engine...
__________________ ![]() ![]() My 1993 Lexus IS 150... If you actually googled this up, then I've got some bad news for you... | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Mantastic! Joined: Jan 8th, 2005 Last Online: 09:14 PM Location: Melbourne, Australia Age: 33 Posts: 10,641
Car: 2006 MY07 Astra SRi Turbo Rep Power: 82 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | As a huge fan of the S2000, I just hope they don't get it wrong. I can understand them wanting it to have more torque - and a 3.0L V6 should be capable of matching the sheer banshee-wailing, rev-the-nuts-off-it insanity of the current S2000 motor - the catch will be how much extra weight the V6 would bring to the front end.
__________________ www.sniffpetrol.com |
| | |
| | #5 |
![]() | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() ![]() My 1993 Lexus IS 150... If you actually googled this up, then I've got some bad news for you... | ||
| | |
| | #7 |
| Banned Joined: Nov 27th, 2005 Last Online: January 5th, 2009 Posts: 3,296
Car: Too many Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Considering the boring old Honda Accords make nice engine noises i can only hope that this is even better. Could be really good, just hope they don't make it too heavy, or more importantly, too front heavy. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Joined: Nov 9th, 2006 Last Online: January 6th, 2009 Location: QLD, Australia Posts: 265
Car: EVO 8 MR Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Well Honda have the 3.5L V6 with DOD technology they could probably use. Providing that engine isn't too heavy that'd cure the enviromentalist side of things. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Joined: Feb 5th, 2007 Last Online: January 2nd, 2009 Location: road atlanta Posts: 319
Car: rsx type s Rep Power: 9 ![]() ![]() | tiny tiny v8 that revs to 12.
__________________ wtb: battletoads for wii, pm me |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Ambitious but rubbish! Joined: Jul 12th, 2004 Last Online: 08:31 AM Location: Sydney, Australia Age: 18 Posts: 9,196
Car: 1998 Subaru Legacy 2.5L Rep Power: 41 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | In a market where many cars have 3.2 and 3.5's under their hoods - a 3.0L might be a good compromise between torque and weight. Just depends how Honda make it. I'm a big fan of the S2000. Its aged so well! And its interior is so driver focussed. Its a very distinct car! |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Makes me think too much of a BMW aesthetically. A new BMW that is. It'll probably go nice though being a Hon-dar.
__________________ ...I'm a shark, I'm a SHAAAARK!! Suck my diiiiick, I'M A SHAAARK!!!!!!!
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| .sa = bad driver! | Man, what's with the S cars getting bigger and bigger as time goes by? First the S360 became the S500, then the S600, S800, S2000, and now S3000? Why not just cut to the chase and put SBCs in them at the factory? ![]() All joking aside, if they put a 3.0L inline six into it with ~325 hp, I'll be very happy. Even something like a 2.5L I-4 would be nice, as long as it revs high. If they just shoved their 3.5L V6 in there, it'd be kind of a shame, since there are already plenty of grunty V6 sports cars out there (350/370z, Genesis, TT, SLK350, soon to be Camaro, etc).
__________________ "Shit, that's a busy table cloth." -matt2000 |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Joined: Sep 22nd, 2007 Last Online: 12:50 PM Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 183
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | i've been admiring the pictures for a while very sexy car and good to see it'll have more torque hopefully they can hold onto those endless revs the s2000 is renowned for just had a thought though the back of the car has a hint of the bmw 6 series the boot is a different shape to the curved back, and if you look at it with the 6 series in mind, its sort of similar |
| | |
| | #14 |
| ^The boot is humped in such a weird way to provide extra boot space, as I've heard from one of a car deisgn video featuring Mr Bangle of BMW explaining his car designs.
__________________ ![]() ![]() "If the Ferrari president is right about the Singapore Grand Prix being a circus," Ecclestone told The Mail on Sunday, "then we have to be grateful to him for providing the clowns." Support Porsche in taking over Volkswagen! HAPPY 2009! | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| DO VERY WANT
__________________ James is cooler than anyone else in the world, ever. | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Give it some torque and force feed it and we'll talk ![]() | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Hedgehog Sandwich | Anyone see Mazda MX-5 in that? Looks great, and of course, buyers will be nothing but satisfied. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| The idea of a high-revving 3.0L line-6 engine sounds good. I bet Honda has the technology to make it fit without adding much weight.
__________________ Resistance is futile (if < 1 omh) | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Joined: Oct 6th, 2007 Last Online: January 5th, 2009 Posts: 1,307
Car: 1988 Mini Cooper, 1998 MB E55 AMG Rep Power: 10 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | A higher capacity 4-cylinder engine that revs to 9K would be awesome for the S3000. I'm not sure a V6 really works with the philosophy of the S2000 sports car. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| ^ will bore you to death | I seriously doubt Honda would spend the money to develop an I-6 just for this car. The current F20/F22c engines are heavily based off of other engines in their lineup. I hope they take their V6 and tweak it above what's in other cars, rather than pull a GM/Ford/Chrysler and take what they have and shove it in a rwd car and call it sporty. Honda's S cars have ALWAYS reved very high, I expect nothing less of the S2000's successor. I'd wager on, and much rather see, them stick with a worked over K24 (perhaps from the RDX turbo) and shave some weight out of the car.
__________________ |
| | |