FinalGear.com Forums  

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill

Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums!

Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill Discussion of new cars on the market, concept cars, prototypes, spy shots, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 21st, 2005, 11:48 PM   #1
 
Overheat's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 7th, 2004
Last Online: September 30th, 2008
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 5,735
Rep Power: 29
Overheat has between 250 and 349 reputationOverheat has between 250 and 349 reputationOverheat has between 250 and 349 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to Overheat Send a message via MSN to Overheat
Default Spy Shot: Land Rover Freelander

Some observers reckoned we'd see the all-new Land Rover Freelander as early as this year's Frankfurt Motor Show, but it was conspicuous by its absence. However, the advanced state of the car in these pictures shows it's close to production-ready and, instead, we expect to see the finished car for the first time early next year. A January debut at the Detroit Show is a distinct possibility as Land Rover knows the US market is vital to the car's success, and sales should start late in 2006.

It's clear from the pictures that the new car looks very similar to the existing model, especially around the nose where Land Rover trademarks such as the grille and clamshell bonnet are obvious, even under the disguise. However, we expect that several styling cues from the Discovery 3 and Range Rover will find their way onto the new car. Look closely, for example, and there appears to be a new air intake ahead of the front passenger door, as on the Discovery 3.

Another difference on this new model is that the central location of the rear number plate seems to confirm that the spare wheel will not hang on the rear door, as on the current model. Likewise, the position of the handle on the tailgate seems to suggest that it will open from the top, whereas the current model's is a side-hinged affair. The car itself is believed to have grown slightly in every dimension, with a wider track and longer wheelbase, but head of design Geoff Upex has already said the car will be basically the same size as the current model. What will improve, though, is the car's packaging, so it should provide more space for both passengers and luggage. The pictures also seem to show that the rear doors have grown, making for easier access.

Despite what the similar looks might suggest, the car actually sits on an all-new platform, a stretched version of the C1 platform that underpins the Ford Focus, Mazda 3 and Volvo S40. In due course, we expect to see a 'baby' Volvo 4x4, the XC50, on the same building blocks.

The new Freelander is expected to be an even more capable vehicle off-road than the current model, with a stiffer chassis and increased ground clearance. Most of the components will come from parent company Ford, but upgraded to ensure the new car performs as well as we expect of a Land Rover away from Tarmac. The gearboxes and engines, likewise, have been upgraded to improve their off-road performance and will include stronger V6 units that are crucial to the car's success in America.

The car in the pictures is a five-door and, unlike the current model, that will be the only body style available. The slow-selling three-door and soft-top models are not being directly replaced. However, rumours persist that we will eventually see a 'baby' Land Rover which will sit below this new Freelander in the Land Rover range, possibly in 2008 and including a front-wheel drive model.

http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander001.jpghttp://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander002.jpg
http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander003.jpghttp://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander004.jpg
http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander005.jpghttp://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander006.jpg
http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/spyshots/L/land-rover/03-large/freelander007.jpg


Nose-on, the new car's similarities to the existing model are obvious.

The air intake ahead of the front door echoes that on the Discovery 3.

The new car is based on a stretched version of the Ford Focus platform.

Packaging improvements give more room for passengers and luggage.

Larger rear doors should improve access for passengers.

The new Freelander should be even more capable off-road than the current car.

The central number plate suggests the spare wheel will be housed inside.
__________________
Overheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Old September 22nd, 2005, 12:39 AM   #2
 
p0w3r's Avatar
 
Joined: May 21st, 2004
Last Online: 3:52 AM
Location: New York City!
Age: 20
Posts: 1,294
Car: 2008 Audi A4 2.0T
Rep Power: 28
p0w3r has between 350 and 449 reputationp0w3r has between 350 and 449 reputationp0w3r has between 350 and 449 reputationp0w3r has between 350 and 449 reputationp0w3r has between 350 and 449 reputation
Default Re: Spy Shot: Land Rover Freelander

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overheat
However, rumours persist that we will eventually see a 'baby' Land Rover which will sit below this new Freelander in the Land Rover range, possibly in 2008 and including a front-wheel drive model
noooo!!! that would be a SIN images/smilies/no.gif
__________________
p0w3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 12:44 AM   #3
 
bihus's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 7th, 2003
Last Online: December 18th, 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 4,618
Car: BMW 330Cd
LFS Status: LFS Status
Rep Power: 29
bihus has between 10 and 49 reputation
Send a message via MSN to bihus
Default Re: Spy Shot: Land Rover Freelander

Quote:
Originally Posted by p0w3r
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overheat
However, rumours persist that we will eventually see a 'baby' Land Rover which will sit below this new Freelander in the Land Rover range, possibly in 2008 and including a front-wheel drive model
noooo!!! that would be a SIN images/smilies/no.gif
You don't live in the UK, which will, sooner or later, ban 4x4s from cities.
bihus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 5:48 AM   #4
 
gtrietsc's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 14th, 2004
Last Online: November 20th, 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX USA
Age: 32
Posts: 1,241
Car: '06 BMW X3, '07 Ford F-150 FX4
Rep Power: 38
gtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputationgtrietsc has between 1500 and 1999 reputation
Send a message via AIM to gtrietsc Send a message via MSN to gtrietsc Send a message via Skype™ to gtrietsc Xbox Playstation Network Twitter
Default

Well, after having driven one of the current Freelanders, they need to do *something*, because it sucks right now. Slow, poor handling, gas mileage isnt very good, etc. I was very disappointed.
__________________
gtrietsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 1:33 PM   #5
 
Dr. Woo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 3rd, 2005
Last Online: June 27th, 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,126
Rep Power: 0
Dr. Woo has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via AIM to Dr. Woo Send a message via MSN to Dr. Woo Send a message via Yahoo to Dr. Woo
Default Re: Spy Shot: Land Rover Freelander

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overheat
but it was conspicuous by its absence.
Oh, heaven forbid we miss out on the new crap-edition Land Rover.
__________________
Dr. Woo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 1:41 PM   #6
fbc
Moderator
 
fbc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 8th, 2005
Last Online: November 11th, 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 34
Posts: 11,776
Car: 2006 MY07 Astra SRi Turbo
Rep Power: 128
fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.fbc has a reputable reputation.
Default

Good lord - a front-wheel drive Land Rover?? images/smilies/no.gif What next, a front-wheel drive Jaguar... oh, hang on...

Test drivers have a nice variety of hats images/smilies/tongue.gif
__________________
www.sniffpetrol.com
fbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 2:31 PM   #7
 
Xeon SX's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 8th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: London
Posts: 1,429
Rep Power: 22
Xeon SX has between 150 and 249 reputationXeon SX has between 150 and 249 reputation
Default

and why are 4x4 considered the most ecologically unfriendly?

big engines? what?
Xeon SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 4:14 PM   #8
"bangle for president"
 
bone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 14th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: belgium!!
Age: 25
Posts: 6,506
Car: yamaha banshee (and an opel astra from work)
Rep Power: 40
bone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputation
Send a message via MSN to bone
Default

lots of friction/surface area/drag, so crappy mpg...
bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 5:34 PM   #9
 
Xeon SX's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 8th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: London
Posts: 1,429
Rep Power: 22
Xeon SX has between 150 and 249 reputationXeon SX has between 150 and 249 reputation
Default

them maybe remove vans and trucks off the road too?
Xeon SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 6:59 PM   #10
"bangle for president"
 
bone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 14th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: belgium!!
Age: 25
Posts: 6,506
Car: yamaha banshee (and an opel astra from work)
Rep Power: 40
bone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputationbone has between 1000 and 1499 reputation
Send a message via MSN to bone
Default

those have a use no other type of car can furfill, SUVs have none, they carry people around just as good as a civic would do
bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 7:11 PM   #11
Lady GaGa's #1 Fan
 
BlaRo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 18th, 2005
Last Online: 12:35 AM
Location: Assachusetts
Age: 21
Posts: 11,259
Car: 1997 Yamaha Seca II, 1976 Honda CB550F
Rep Power: 372
BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.
Send a message via AIM to BlaRo Twitter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bone
those have a use no other type of car can furfill, SUVs have none, they carry people around just as good as a civic would do
So do vans and trucks. SUVs are used for many different reasons; why should a government decide whether they're useful to the people or not? This isn't just American narrow-mindedness, but even if 50% of SUVs are used by yuppie soccer moms applying makeup en route to Starbucks, they still have purposes to fill for different types of people.
__________________

"It is impossible to describe this kind of performance to the uninitiated. Telling a traffic officer or a safety crusader like Ralph Nader that 100 mph can be safe is like reading the Constitution to a Maoist; it is a strange and hostile concept."
-Brock Yates.

The body was accidentally unearthed from a shallow grave by construction workers. Because of Parkinson's.
BlaRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2005, 7:40 PM   #12
 
sandor_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 16th, 2005
Last Online: December 28th, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, USA
Age: 29
Posts: 1,043
Car: 911, 328i, Golf, '71 Vespa Sprint
Rep Power: 0
sandor_ has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaRo
Quote:
Originally Posted by bone
those have a use no other type of car can furfill, SUVs have none, they carry people around just as good as a civic would do
So do vans and trucks. SUVs are used for many different reasons; why should a government decide whether they're useful to the people or not? This isn't just American narrow-mindedness, but even if 50% of SUVs are used by yuppie soccer moms applying makeup en route to Starbucks, they still have purposes to fill for different types of people.
i could see non-commercial vehicles being registered more closely by GVW or fuel consumption, and having a tiered system whereby, say, a vehicle hat gets under 30 MPG must be occupied by at least two people, under 20 MPG at least 4 people, etc ... or over 4000 lbs GVW must be occupied by 4 people, over 3000 lbs GVW occupied by 2 people....

it could be convoluted, and you could probably easily "get away" with breaking the code, but it would all be in an effort to 1) shed excess poundage from cars and 2) increase not only fuel efficiency but consumer desire to have a fuel efficient car and 3) increase the gallons per passenger mile of our commuters...

personally, i would love to see gas prices stay over $3 a gallon here in the US. already in the past two weeks SEPTA (South Eastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority - Philadelphia's public transit) has seen a DAILY increase of 10,000 riders per day. this has affected their bottom line so much that they cannot foresee a need to increase fares at all to subsidize increased fuel costs. Thats nice, as SEPTA is already the most expensive metro area transit system in the US...
sandor_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:37 AM.
All content © FinalGear.com unless stated otherwise.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Page generated in 0.24271 seconds with 17 queries by web1
no new posts