FinalGear.com Forums  

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > General Automotive

Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums!

General Automotive All stuff relating to cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc. that don't fit in the categories below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 6th, 2006, 10:27 PM   #1
 
hajj's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 29th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,871
Rep Power: 24
hajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to hajj
Default "Change or die" - Ford chief warns the sector

Quote:
"Either the American automakers, including Ford, will begin to change, play far better offence and truly connect with customers," Mr. Field said. "Or it will be the beginning of the end for some companies."
Just read an article about Mr Flieds' speech during the LA motorshow. Have you guys got anything on this? Seems interesting first time someone really addresses the issues in public. images/smilies/thumbsup.gif
hajj is offline   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Old January 6th, 2006, 10:38 PM   #2
Not a dude.
 
IVIaster's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 10th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Finland
Posts: 738
Car: 1990 Volvo 740
Rep Power: 17
IVIaster has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

That end is the Japanese motor industry. They have all ready done it to the american motorbikes. Americans cant make efficiently cheap cars.
IVIaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2006, 10:47 PM   #3
 
Urban Sombrero's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 15th, 2005
Last Online: October 15th, 2007
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 0
Urban Sombrero has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

That's complete rubbish. American cars connect with the public in a great way. They are superior to over priced European cars and are more generally just as reliable, and more reliable in many cases (my friend's Mercedes lives at the shop). We can make cars better than the Europeans, but consumers aren't really forcing the auto companies here to stop cutting corners because domestics are still strong here and not at all threatened by foreign car makers except for the Japanese. American car companies either own or are partnered with most foreign companies as well.

What I think American automakers should do is focus on is making good cars for other countries, like Ford has. But most American companies could care less about that since they have subsidiaries that sell their cars for them in foreign markets.
Urban Sombrero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2006, 11:19 PM   #4
Lady GaGa's #1 Fan
 
BlaRo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 18th, 2005
Last Online: 12:35 AM
Location: Assachusetts
Age: 21
Posts: 11,259
Car: 1997 Yamaha Seca II, 1976 Honda CB550F
Rep Power: 372
BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.BlaRo has more bars, in more places.
Send a message via AIM to BlaRo Twitter
Default

^ Not necessarily, but you're right about the reliability part. Nobody wants to believe it, though...

30 years of domestic laziness and irresponsiveness has caught up to them, and consumer perception (along with spiraling healthcare costs etc.) is one of the biggest enemies of the American car industry. Field is right; there needs to be major changes now or the decent cars that come out of American companies will be ignored.

Ford has a decent lineup currently, if not a bit boring. But then again, Toyota became successful by building mildly boring cars that work (Celica, Supra, etc. notwithstanding.) Their management of their luxury brands like Land Rover and Jaguar is superb; no "Other GM products excluded" crap here.

Which leads me conveniently to the next point: what I think is killing GM the most is badge engineering. Consumers aren't stupid! We know you're taking your Equinox (which isn't that bad of a vehicle, really) and instead of going the extra mile to make it a worldbeater, as written about in Autoextremist, they slap a Pontiac badge on it and expect us to fall for it. Look at Saab; sure they have more sales, but how are consumers going to feel about it as a premium vehicle (it is, really!) when they're getting Trailblazer parts on it? Etc. ad nauseaum.



I've got a feeling this thread is going to get real ugly, quick.

So in advance, you're all n00bies, and anybody who posts anything next is wrong and a blithering idiot. images/smilies/stupid.gif images/smilies/mrgreen.gif
__________________

"It is impossible to describe this kind of performance to the uninitiated. Telling a traffic officer or a safety crusader like Ralph Nader that 100 mph can be safe is like reading the Constitution to a Maoist; it is a strange and hostile concept."
-Brock Yates.

The body was accidentally unearthed from a shallow grave by construction workers. Because of Parkinson's.
BlaRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2006, 11:30 PM   #5
 
AutoMX's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 3rd, 2004
Last Online: September 12th, 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 800
Rep Power: 0
AutoMX has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to AutoMX Send a message via AIM to AutoMX Send a message via Yahoo to AutoMX
Default

i have to disagree. first of all, european cars are not overpriced by any means, they are just overpriced here, just like american cars are overpriced there (not the european made models of things like Ford though). In europe, many taxis use mercedes because they last for a very long time and are easy to fix. my dad owns a 300E and have no problems.
american cars vary greatly in reliability. i know the buick v6 series is very good from personal experience, and that many american cars can run for a long time in north america without costing much.

i think they are indicating that american manufacturers are slow to respons to market demands and bring few "innovative" features. it's not like people aren't aware of how bad the interiors in most US cars are, or how much more efficient some small japanese cars are. it's just that US makers would rather just hammer out a bunch of GMC Yukon's or Ford Expeditions with bigger engines or more seats and lower the selling prices. why? i have no idea, but it's hurting them for sure.
the US started the whole big truck and SUV trend, and now something like 65% of vehicles sold in the US are SUV's and trucks. the problem for GM and the others is that suddenly Lexus / Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, etc.. all make competitive if not better trucks and SUVs, so new sales are dropping..
__________________

AutoMX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2006, 11:32 PM   #6
 
hajj's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 29th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,871
Rep Power: 24
hajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputationhajj has between 450 and 549 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to hajj
Default

I agree with you BlaRo. Ford seems to know how to manage their line-up. Their premium-brands are connected, but you dont see the connection directly. Ford Europe has a lot of freedom to design cars which are suited for the European market and it works. I cannot really judge their american line-up, but that seems a but "dull" to me.
GM is a different story though, they simply take a car which has been engineered somewhere and badge it. Look at Vauxhall for a example I dont think they design their cars, sure they have factories in the UK, but the designing and engineering takes place in Germany. The only thing Vauxhall gets are Holden's and Opel on which they may put their badge. This strategy is useless if you want to keep a particular brand.
__________________
Global Warming isn't working - I am FREEZING!!
hajj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 12:02 AM   #7
 
oliB's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 14th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,391
Rep Power: 25
oliB has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to oliB
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AutoMX
i have to disagree. first of all, european cars are not overpriced by any means, they are just overpriced here, just like american cars are overpriced there (not the european made models of things like Ford though). In europe, many taxis use mercedes because they last for a very long time and are easy to fix. my dad owns a 300E and have no problems.
Sorry, but you got that wrong. It really is a very common misconception among Americans, that, us Germans for example, could buy a 5 series or an E-Class for dirt-cheap just because they are built here.

European cars are way more expensive here than they are in America. Albeit most of them are built in Germany, we pay thousands, in some cases tens of thousands, of dollars more for BMWs, VWs, Mercedes', etc.

You are right about the American cars though. They are not cheap over here either.
__________________
oliB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 12:56 AM   #8
 
M3lover's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: The milkyway, Earth, Denmark, Copenhagen
Age: 23
Posts: 982
Car: Pedalpower for now...
Rep Power: 18
M3lover has between 50 and 149 reputationM3lover has between 50 and 149 reputation
Playstation Network
Default

In the Europe vs. America battle there is a reason the European cars are more expensive. They are if not better (just to be on the safe side), then more engineered than their american rivals. There is simply put more thought into every bit of a European car. Also a european car will win on the interior everyday.
Edit: Forgot - Europe = Quality over quantity!
__________________
Mmmhh, gotta love living in Denmark. We have 180 % tax on cars. Yep, an M3 cost about the same as a 997 Turbo does in Sweden, and sadly i'm not kidding!
M3lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 1:19 AM   #9
 
mautzel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Last Online: October 28th, 2009
Location: Frankfurt/M, Deutschland
Age: 29
Posts: 2,461
Car: Golf IV TDI
Rep Power: 25
mautzel has between 350 and 449 reputationmautzel has between 350 and 449 reputationmautzel has between 350 and 449 reputationmautzel has between 350 and 449 reputation
Default

Another thing to keep in mind is that America only gets full spec European cars (in case you don't know, the entry model for the 3 series is a 129hp 4 cylinder version called 318i over here) which are by far not as well equipped with electronical gadgets as they are in the U.S.

Hence, the Mercedes E-Class is the favourite choice amongst taxi drivers in Germany because they're dead reliable and easily will last for the same mileage as an American dependant. The advantage especially of German cars that is as far as I can see seen as a disadvantage in the U.S. is the unreliability of parts which aren't even available as an option on similar American dependants.

And I think it is really unnecessary to discuss that the built quality and the quality of interior parts of German premium cars is better than the parts or the fitting in an American one. And please don't tell me that this is irrelevant, otherwise no one would buy German cars.
mautzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 3:11 AM   #10
 
kaleidopope's Avatar
 
Joined: May 30th, 2005
Last Online: September 9th, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 0
kaleidopope has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default Re: "Change or die" - Ford chief warns the sector

Quote:
Originally Posted by hajj
Quote:
"Either the American automakers, including Ford, will begin to change, play far better offence and truly connect with customers," Mr. Field said. "Or it will be the beginning of the end for some companies."
Seems interesting first time someone really addresses the issues in public. images/smilies/thumbsup.gif
Folks have been singing that song since the 70's, it's just that it has taken this long for the "Buy American!" crowd to begin to hear it. US automakers have tried every trick they could think of (nat'l pride, save US jobs, huge rebates, etc.) to improve sales domestically, except for one:

building better cars.

Over the last several years, glimmers of hope have been seen on that front, and I think the Big 2.5 are getting better, but Detroit has yet to roll out a worldbeater.
kaleidopope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 5:29 AM   #11
 
wahaha's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006
Last Online: June 29th, 2009
Location: Univ. of Michigan
Posts: 108
Car: Audi A6 2.7T, not going to show off by listing all
Rep Power: 0
wahaha has negative reputation
Playstation Network
Default

Or die? For christ sake they're already dead on their feet. They're just too rigor mortised to fall over.

Even the all mighty doesn't have a big enough line of credit to bail them out. Everytime they write a check, the bank bounces.

How far into junk status do you have to be lowered to be considered JUNK. I think once is enough. The public has spoken.
__________________
wahaha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 8:00 AM   #12
 
mmap's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 12th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Finland
Age: 30
Posts: 1,302
Car: BMW / Suzuki VX800
Rep Power: 23
mmap has between 10 and 49 reputation
Default

The american cars are cheap, because the companies have to sell them cheap! Otherwise no one would buy them. This is acknolwedged as a huge issue in the industry. The american companies are scratching their arses over how to improve profitability without incereasing the cost of the cars themselves...

And there is an old saying int he car indusry. "There is no problem for a car company that a good product cannot fix"

So why are the American companies in deep shit and Japanese and (most) European companes are profitable?
mmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 3:22 PM   #13
Not a dude.
 
IVIaster's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 10th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Finland
Posts: 738
Car: 1990 Volvo 740
Rep Power: 17
IVIaster has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

The Americans chose compete against the japanease with prize instead of quality and now the japanease offer both.
IVIaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 4:49 PM   #14
 
GraemeH's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 19th, 2005
Last Online: 4:43 AM
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 2,068
Car: Toyota Corolla. Rawrr.
LFS Status: LFS Status
Rep Power: 34
GraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputationGraemeH has between 1000 and 1499 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Sombrero
They are superior to over priced European cars ... We can make cars better than the Europeans

Ahahahahaha

ahhahahaha

ahhhh, thanks for that.
GraemeH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 9:40 PM   #15
Hormone Induced
 
BerserkerCatSplat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 21st, 2005
Last Online: 7:08 AM
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,890
Car: ZJ 4X4X5
Rep Power: 168
BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmap

So why are the American companies in deep shit and Japanese and (most) European companes are profitable?
I've said it once and I'll say it again, it's the unions that are killing them. A guy who tightens lug nuts at the Ford factory makes $50,000/yr. For tightening lug nuts. Forklift drivers make even more than that, ~$80,000/yr. Ford can't do a thing about the insane wages, because of the unions. Ford and GM pay out tens of billions of dollars each year in outrageous pension and health benefits - imagine if they had those tens of billions to actually improve their cars! No, the union (UAW) seems to intent on destroying the companies they hold by the throat.
__________________

OSPhoto
BerserkerCatSplat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 9:53 PM   #16
 
mmap's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 12th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Finland
Age: 30
Posts: 1,302
Car: BMW / Suzuki VX800
Rep Power: 23
mmap has between 10 and 49 reputation
Default

^^ Well you are right of course, the unions and the pension funds etc. VW Workers accepted lower pay etc. in order to save their jobs and ensure the companys future...

BUT if they made proper cars they could sell them for more money or sell more of them. And while designing a well sorted out car does cost money, it's not like they do not have capable people already working for them? they merely choose to do things differently.
mmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2006, 10:26 PM   #17
Hormone Induced
 
BerserkerCatSplat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 21st, 2005
Last Online: 7:08 AM
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,890
Car: ZJ 4X4X5
Rep Power: 168
BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.BerserkerCatSplat has more bars, in more places.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmap
.

BUT if they made proper cars they could sell them for more money or sell more of them. And while designing a well sorted out car does cost money, it's not like they do not have capable people already working for them? they merely choose to do things differently.
True, but better materials = more expensive. Greater manufacturing precision = more money. It all comes down to cash flow, and companies like GM are struggling with their strangled funds. Ford is doing a better job than GM so far, but Ford is still battling against the unions. Heck, Ford brought both Aston Martin and Jaguar back from near-failure in the early 90's, which was no small task! I think that union presence and influence needs to be shrunk, and in a big way. If American manufacturers are to begin making better vehicles, they need to break the unions.
__________________

OSPhoto
BerserkerCatSplat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2006, 4:30 AM   #18
 
wahaha's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006
Last Online: June 29th, 2009
Location: Univ. of Michigan
Posts: 108
Car: Audi A6 2.7T, not going to show off by listing all
Rep Power: 0
wahaha has negative reputation
Playstation Network
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BerserkerCatSplat
I've said it once and I'll say it again, it's the unions that are killing them. A guy who tightens lug nuts at the Ford factory makes $50,000/yr.
Um... last I heard they are paying the same wages of $25/hr to the Benz and BMW assembly workers in the US. I don't see either of them hurting. Except for Benzs pathetic partnership with a US company that has obliterated their quality and reliability ratings.
__________________
wahaha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2006, 5:06 AM   #19
 
logo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 18th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Canada-Ottawa
Posts: 1,703
Rep Power: 23
logo has between 10 and 49 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BerserkerCatSplat
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmap
.

BUT if they made proper cars they could sell them for more money or sell more of them. And while designing a well sorted out car does cost money, it's not like they do not have capable people already working for them? they merely choose to do things differently.
True, but better materials = more expensive. Greater manufacturing precision = more money. It all comes down to cash flow, and companies like GM are struggling with their strangled funds. Ford is doing a better job than GM so far, but Ford is still battling against the unions. Heck, Ford brought both Aston Martin and Jaguar back from near-failure in the early 90's, which was no small task! I think that union presence and influence needs to be shrunk, and in a big way. If American manufacturers are to begin making better vehicles, they need to break the unions.
About the jaguar thing, yes they did bring it back but they ruined it, they lowered the prices of Jaguars (like any solution to them, lower prices we can sell more) and now Jaguar lost its exclusivity and image and will be proabably hard to get it back, back in the day the super car is Ferrari, the luxuirous fast car is Jaguar, not anymore though. I actually saw an analyst talking about how ford saved and in the same time ruined Jaguar's image, But they're doing something about it, atleast thats what he said.

well whats happening to the american car makes is only good for the consumers, it should be better cars for less money in the future or else they're done, and I agree with you completely about Unions, they are the evil in everything.
__________________

Adrenaline. Always Hungry, 1 n33d foods bebe!
logo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2006, 9:04 PM   #20
Not a dude.
 
IVIaster's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 10th, 2005
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Finland
Posts: 738
Car: 1990 Volvo 740
Rep Power: 17
IVIaster has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BerserkerCatSplat
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmap
.

BUT if they made proper cars they could sell them for more money or sell more of them. And while designing a well sorted out car does cost money, it's not like they do not have capable people already working for them? they merely choose to do things differently.
True, but better materials = more expensive. Greater manufacturing precision = more money. It all comes down to cash flow, and companies like GM are struggling with their strangled funds. Ford is doing a better job than GM so far, but Ford is still battling against the unions. Heck, Ford brought both Aston Martin and Jaguar back from near-failure in the early 90's, which was no small task! I think that union presence and influence needs to be shrunk, and in a big way. If American manufacturers are to begin making better vehicles, they need to break the unions.
[Are you against unions?] I though the unions were strugling in the US. Why have GM and Ford accepted their demands? Finding replacements for lug nut screwers shouldn´t be hard in the US.
IVIaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > General Automotive
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM.
All content © FinalGear.com unless stated otherwise.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Page generated in 0.30793 seconds with 17 queries by web1
no new posts