![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums! | |
| General Automotive All stuff relating to cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc. that don't fit in the categories below. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 27th, 2005
Last Online: May 27th, 2009
Location: Detriot Metro Area
Posts: 3,311
Car: 2 Rust buckets and a confused 1999 American.
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I remember in the second grade deciding that me and my friend Kenny were going to be in a rock band called "The Jaguars." Sure it was a dumb name, but i think it goes to show that even though executive cars are a boring subject matter to 7 year olds somehow Jaguar eluded that. There has been something very emotional and human about them for as long as i can remember, and while I'm on the subject of being young, i remember crystal clearly that as a unbiased 10 year old i preferred the looks of the old XK to that of the DB7. Sure they looked similar at the time, but somehow the XK just looked more like it knew what it wanted to be then any of the Aston Martins of the 90s. My main concern and the reason i write this thread is that at the present it seems as though Jaguar would rather be Hyundai. Not so much the current line up, but the upcoming line-up. I don't have much of a issue with the XK, nothing that hasn't been said already, but the new S-type and X-type are both embarrassments. The S-type was already looking bad, and now its even worse. And while the X-type isn't necessarily bad, theres nothing that makes me think "better not cut that guy off if i want to live" when i look at it. So really the whole point of buying a Jaguar seems gone. I remember looking at the CF-X and thinking "Yes! this could save Jaguar" and now i feel betrayed because what they have churned out looks more like "mass-market" styling then anything else. I recently noticed, with alot of excitement to be honest, that Jaguar listed "XF" on its website, sadly this seems too have the profile of a Lexus and a front end dictated by Marketing instead of style, damn
What do you think? Pictures: (upcoming Jaguars, not sure which is which because all the mags say something different) ![]() ![]() XF: ![]() I suppose every car manufacture has had at least a generation of so-so looking cars, i just wish Jaguar could have chosen to have such a moment during a period in which they weren't going bankrupt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Joined: Feb 1st, 2007
Last Online: 10:49 PM
Location: Dallas, Texas
Age: 33
Posts: 10,403
Car: 87 XJ6, 95 XJR, 90 WD21, 86 CB700SC, 98 PC800
Rep Power: 344
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The first two were artists concepts of what the S-Type and XK replacements would look like (respectively), the third is the XF artists' concept, and the last IS the XF.
Ford just has no idea what to do with Jaguar and keeps hiring "diversity appointees" who have no clue either. Historically, NO Jaguar designed by committee instead of being ramrodded by one man has ever done well.
__________________
Enough is enough. ![]() We are not here to subsidize your clueless business plans or reward your failures. 1986 Honda Nighthawk 700S (project, light restoration in progress) 1987 Jaguar XJ6 Series III Vanden Plas (modified) 1990 Nissan (WD21) Pathfinder SE 4x4 (little red offroad commuter box) 1995 Jaguar (X300) XJR 1998 Honda Pacific Coast PC800 (two-wheeled pickup truck/utility bike) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
wants Shia LaBeouf
Joined: Mar 5th, 2007
Last Online: March 18th, 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 32
Posts: 2,068
Rep Power: 94
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() I don´t like the headlamps, but the side of it, the hood, the grill ... looks fine. Certainly not much of Jag in there, but the last S-type looked like a Rover and the last X-type like a Mercedes E-Class. So this one looks a bit Lexus. So what? I´d prefer it to it´s predecessor ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I'm starting to think, that with the big push to rid itself of the "olde-worlde" reputation, Jaguar may loose some of it's defining qualities.
I really like the XJ. Why? Because it's stayed pretty much to the same formula, the same styling (save for the XJ40). To borrow some ideas from J. Clarkson (originally regarding Aston Martin), a Jag should be big, heavy (if in feeling if nothing else), dark, damp and green. It should feel fast and competent, but still have an air of solidity about it. This is particularly evident if we look at the cars they made under British Leyland. You took one look and you immediately knew you were looking at a Jag. The XF, if I may be so bold, has a whiff of Hyundai about it. It's mostly the nose and lights that bother me. The S-Type may be somewhat fish-like and much criticised, but it's a Jag in all senses. The X-Type, perhaps could be styled as the XF. But then that's a Mondeo, with leather seats and Hyundai styling. Pass. I don't really know if there is a future for Jaguar at the moment, and that's sad. I love their core products(XJ/XK), which are pretty much traceable back to the original XJ and the XJS. They're characterful cars in a world full of 250km/h German dishwashers. It seems most people prefer the dishwasher, and I can't see myself forking out cash at any stage for a Jag that looks like a Hyundai. P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Joined: Mar 21st, 2006
Last Online: 10:52 PM
Location: Southampton
Posts: 9,640
Car: Vauxhall Zafira 1.9 TDI Slush box.
Rep Power: 208
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why is it that loads of car companies (including Jaguar) decide that they don't want their current demographic but want to go after another? Honda (in this country at least) was the older persons car of choice. They have been desperate to upset these people and sell to whom? I do not think that they actually know - viz new CIVIC.
__________________
Lotus 7 Registration Mark = KAR120C : Engine Number = 461034 TZ Ross Brawn genius or what? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Perceived financial gains? I'd guess they figure that a younger person is more likely to buy a high-spec'd model, and they make a larger profit.
It certinally worked for Caddilac, and it seems to be working for Mazda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Well its not perceived gain, it is actually gains. Its because, at lest in the US, its the younger group that spends a lot of there money (reason why Honda would want to go youth) but also cars that have appeal to the youth market also do well with the Middle Age group/Baby Boomers as we call them here.
A guy who is 50 and could spend the money on a Jag would want a "cool" car that maybe he can use to impress the 25 year old girl at work, not a car that says old person. Jaguar, at lest here in the States has two major images to over come. One, reliability, which is a reason why I no longer have an S-Type, and 2nd the image of old people. But the new S-Type (XF) just looks like, bleh. It does not have any defining qualities. The old S-Type, while had a weird looking face it was weird and because of that you knew it was something special (and was a PITA.. but i digress.)
__________________
I am Pakistani And No! I do not own a 7/11! And my NAME is not Apu! "MPG describes riding like biology describes Sex" -- Harley Davidson Ad ![]() Zuhaib's Blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I've sat in the old S-Type, and believe me the interior was cheap. The chrome ring around the damn door was falling off, even on a brand new one. But to be honest, I'd rather have the S-Type, rather than the XF with a Vauxhall Vectra interior. Shame on you Jaguar. Shame on you Ian Callum for face lifting the XJ.
__________________
![]() ![]() My 1993 Lexus IS 150... If you actually googled this up, then I've got some bad news for you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Previously Known As Jamesd
|
Man, if I ever see Ian Callum, I'm going to punch him in the face for doing that to the XJ. Looks like it's freakin' grinning at you ALL the time.. Jason Plato hit it right on the nial. It's not a big enough change to get a younger demographic interested, and they've just annoyed their loyal fanbase.
@Wizegui oh yeah.. that is a truely horrid interior.
__________________
![]() 1995 BMW E34 530i V8 M60B30 218HP/163kW 5sp Auto 1985 Nissan 910 Bluebird I4 CA20S 105HP/78kW 3sp Auto |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Joined: Dec 3rd, 2005
Last Online: October 27th, 2009
Location: SG
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
looks like a buick
__________________
The North South Highway: Singapore's very own backyard Autobahn |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() That's a bit scary actually... They're too similar for my liking. Honestly, if I'd never seen it before, and you asked me what brand it was I'd say Lexus. If I didn't say Hyundai first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Last Online: May 9th, 2009
Posts: 1,490
Car: 1988 Mini Cooper, 1998 MB E55 AMG
Rep Power: 14
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What jaguar should produce are classy but menacing cars like the current XKR (my neighbor has one, and it seriously turns me on everytime I see it parked outside his garage. Going for a short drive in it just makes me want one even more).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jaguar Concept-XF | Dsemaj | Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill | 14 | January 5th, 2007 8:54 AM |
| Jaguar XKR revealed! | Kowalski | Automotive News / Spy Shots / Concepts / Rumor Mill | 41 | July 3rd, 2006 10:16 PM |
| a day with my boss's Jaguar XJ | haz | Photography | 20 | April 13th, 2005 9:48 AM |
| Jaguar | Renesis | General Automotive | 22 | March 31st, 2004 9:41 PM |