FinalGear.com Forums  

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > General Automotive

Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums!

General Automotive All stuff relating to cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc. that don't fit in the categories below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 9th, 2004, 3:58 AM   #1
Needs a job!
 
Cruzz563's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 8th, 2003
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: Houston, Texas, The States
Posts: 2,683
Rep Power: 31
Cruzz563 has between 350 and 449 reputationCruzz563 has between 350 and 449 reputationCruzz563 has between 350 and 449 reputationCruzz563 has between 350 and 449 reputationCruzz563 has between 350 and 449 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to Cruzz563 Send a message via AIM to Cruzz563 Twitter
Default Mercedes McLaren P8 confirmed

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0223/p8benz_bigfront.jpg

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0223/p8benz400rear.jpg

Quote from Autoweek Mag:
Quote:
The SLR was just the first shot: Mercedes-Benz and McLaren are beyond planning stages for a mid-engine, V8-powered supercar with sights set on Ferrari’s 360 Modena and Ford’s GT. The project car—though only in its formative stage—has a dedicated group looking into its engineering, manufacturing, sales and marketing feasibility, and is codenamed P8. If given approval in the coming months, P8, which would slot between the robust SL65 AMG and the SLR McLaren, could be on the streets testing by late 2006 and in showrooms by late 2007

The P8, depicted here as an artist’s rendering, is officially only a concept. Clearly, management from both Mercedes-Benz and the McLaren Formula One super team would like to put a car like P8 into production. “Yes, we are looking at a mid-engine road car,” Mercedes boss Jürgen Hubbert told AutoWeek last week. “But there is no decision on production.” Before production can happen, M-B and McLaren board members must give P8 unanimous approval. What gives credence to the likelihood of P8 seeing production? News that ultra-performance car guru Neil Hannemann, the engineering mind behind the Dodge Viper, Saleen S7 and the Ford GT, left the friendly confines of Ford in Dearborn Jan. 31 for a job as engineering director at McLaren. P8 also makes smart business sense. The SLR is built in the new McLaren Technology Center in Woking, England, a reported $300 million investment already made by both Mercedes and McLaren. Only by expanding the model product lines of this collaborative effort can that investment be amortized.

There is also ego at stake—M-B and McLaren compete with Ferrari in Formula One on racetracks around the world and want to take on the Italians in the performance street car arena. Perhaps another spur in the side to do this car is knowledge that rival Audi is at an advanced stage with its own mid-engine supercar, the Le Mans, using the Lamborghini Gallardo underpinnings (AW, Feb. 16). Though many specifics of the program remain speculation, some of what we know about the direction of both Mercedes and McLaren opens a window on what such a sports car could be like. Why mid-engine? “If you see the competition in the segment, they are only mid-engine,” says Hubbert. “In McLaren and especially (McLaren’s) Gordon Murray, we have vast experience with mid-engine cars.” Hubbert stressed the Mercedes supercar bears no relationship to the mid-engine ME Four-Twelve concept shown by Chrysler at Detroit. Mercedes engine-tuner AMG merely provided the 850-hp quad-turbo V12 for that concept, which Hubbert doubts will see production.

The high-tech SLR, with its 0-to-60-mph time of 3.7 seconds and 204-mph top speed, has proven both companies can compete in the supercar arena. However, this new mid-engine contender is a tougher assignment, not least because it must be built to a tighter budget and with an eye toward larger sales volumes than the targeted 500 annual build rate of SLR. This is not the first mid-engine road car Mercedes-Benz has considered. The striking C112 concept back in 1991 nearly made it to showrooms but was abandoned due to a downturn in the world’s economy. Also, the company’s CLK GTR was built in small numbers in 1998 to satisfy the FIA’s sports car regulations, though it was very much a race car modified for road use. In McLaren, Mercedes-Benz has a partner that knows well how to apply mid-engine design to road performance. The firm’s celebrated F1 road car may be a decade old, but few would argue it still ranks as the most accomplished supercar ever placed into production. These illustrations reveal how the baby M-B McLaren supercar could look, though wind-tunnel testing will undoubtedly change the package by the time it appears. Chances are a convertible will get the nod, insiders say.

It is reasonable to think P8 will use the same lightweight carbon fiber monocoque construction as the SLR, and incorporate features such as Mercedes’ Pre-Safe early warning system that triggers safety systems in the event of an impending crash. Engineers are striving to keep weight to 3000 pounds, or close to that of the 360 Modena and Gallardo. “Anything lower would be utopian, given the stringent crash standards the new car will need to adhere to, both in Europe and the U.S.,” said an AutoWeek source. The ME Four-Twelve beat this weight target with similar equipment and a bigger engine but no price target. Expect serious attention to weight distribution to maximize handling, with 42 percent front and 58 percent rear weight bias the likely target. We know Mercedes and Michelin are developing a two-compound tire that could make it to P8. Given M-B’s penchant for high-tech gadgets, the P8 is likely to employ the latest in electronic driver aids, too. AutoWeek can reveal top-secret details about the P8’s powerplant. Codenamed M156, it is an all-new normally aspirated 6.3-liter V8 that is also destined to power future AMG versions of the E-, CLS-, S-, CL- and SL-Class cars. The aluminum-block unit is based on Mercedes’ M273-designated four-valve-per-cylinder V8 due out next year, an engine that develops a reliable 500 hp on the engine dyno, say highly placed sources. A twin-turbocharged version that churns out a mammoth 700 hp is in early development, though that mill has not yet received the production green light. The M156 is being developed under AMG engine boss Rolf Zimmermann, who is the mastermind behind the 367-hp normally aspirated and 500-hp supercharged 5.4-liter V8 powerplants in AMG models now. Zimmermann also developed the 555-hp 7.3-liter V12 engine that powers the Pagani Zonda S. Mystery still surrounds the gearbox choice for the new car. All of Mercedes’ recent performance cars—SLR included—get a beefed-up automatic transmission that runs the company’s so-called Speedshift electronics, which make for quicker gear changes.

Sources tell AutoWeek the most likely scenario is a reworked version of the new Mercedes 7G-Tronic unit. With torque converter lock-up on each of its seven forward gears, and electronics that allow it to skip ratios on kickdown, it could turn the monster output into scintillating performance—though without the tactile feel of a manual like those in the 360 Modena and Ford GT. The torque limit for this gearbox is well within what the V8 engine could produce. As the car still awaits a production green flag, there is no firm on-sale date for P8. Still, insiders hint 2008-model-year examples will hit the road by the end of 2007—or just 46 months from now. We are told the business case for a mid-engine supercar centers on annual global sales of 800, which seems low; in fact, flexible assembly methods can allow production to increase to around 1500 a year if necessary. And the price? Positioned between the SL65 AMG and the SLR, industry analysts predict a price tag for the two-seater of around $200,000—a slight premium over the current 360 Modena and a healthy $60,000 more than the $140,000 Ford GT. Still, that is a fraction of the $1.2 million a used McLaren F1 will cost now.
__________________
In the USA, 100% of the Federal Income Tax Money goes to paying interest on the national deficit, and nothing else. Where's the law that says we have to pay?
Cruzz563 is offline   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Old December 9th, 2004, 4:27 AM   #2
 
SiR_dude's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 5th, 2004
Last Online: February 11th, 2009
Location: Somewhere in rural Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,640
Car: 2000 Civic SiR
Rep Power: 28
SiR_dude has between 50 and 149 reputationSiR_dude has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

All I can say is wow. I really hope McMerc start building some kickass cars.

I don't hope that the design stays the same, though. Does anyone else see an Acura TL in the tail? I also don't like the rear brake lights - compare them to the front. Front = square, edgy, and COOL; back = flattened ovals and UGLY. The lopsided roundness of the lights completely contrasts the sharp, edgy styling of the rest of the car. And the side, well, it somehow resembles an RX-8. I don't know, it just doesn't look like a McLaren should. The shape is cool, but it needs some reworking.
SiR_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 4:50 AM   #3
 
andyhui01's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 4th, 2004
Last Online: August 28th, 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 20
Posts: 8,528
Car: 00' Subaru Forester GT
LFS Status: LFS Status
Rep Power: 32
andyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputationandyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputation
Send a message via MSN to andyhui01 Send a message via Yahoo to andyhui01 Send a message via Skype™ to andyhui01 Xbox
Default

the car looks kinda funny... the hood is too short... I like long hoods like the Mclaren SLR images/smilies/wink.gif
__________________
andyhui01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 4:55 AM   #4
 
freakster_991's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 29th, 2004
Last Online: November 1st, 2009
Location: Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 21
freakster_991 has between 10 and 49 reputation
Send a message via MSN to freakster_991
Default

excellent concept..but could have been better....id like to see these cars in the streets and not concept car shows
__________________
phreaq inc. ®
i cant spell....get ovr it..
freakster_991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 7:03 AM   #5
 
idletask's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 25th, 2004
Last Online: January 26th, 2005
Location: France
Posts: 256
Rep Power: 0
idletask has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

Hmm, The 7G Tronic uses a mutiplate clutch, not a torque converter...
__________________
There are 10 sorts of people. Those who understand binary, and the others.
---
Weight is everything. Power is just an accessory.
idletask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 9:56 AM   #6
 
Joined: Nov 9th, 2004
Last Online: January 15th, 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 0
Wutputt has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idletask
Hmm, The 7G Tronic uses a mutiplate clutch, not a torque converter...
images/smilies/icon_question.gif images/smilies/icon_question.gif images/smilies/icon_question.gif

Like every conventional automatic transmission, it uses a torque converter. The only special thing about it, is it has a cleverer lock-up clutch control.

You can clearly see the torque convertor in this image:

http://china.nikkeibp.co.jp/china/img_data/030909bdim1.jpg
Wutputt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 10:34 AM   #7
 
andyhui01's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 4th, 2004
Last Online: August 28th, 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 20
Posts: 8,528
Car: 00' Subaru Forester GT
LFS Status: LFS Status
Rep Power: 32
andyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputationandyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputation
Send a message via MSN to andyhui01 Send a message via Yahoo to andyhui01 Send a message via Skype™ to andyhui01 Xbox
Default

hmm... I don't really see the torque converter... usually its the big round tube thing... or is that circle thing at the front the torque converter, I've never seen them in this shape before
__________________
andyhui01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 10:41 AM   #8
 
idletask's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 25th, 2004
Last Online: January 26th, 2005
Location: France
Posts: 256
Rep Power: 0
idletask has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutputt
Quote:
Originally Posted by idletask
Hmm, The 7G Tronic uses a mutiplate clutch, not a torque converter...
images/smilies/icon_question.gif images/smilies/icon_question.gif images/smilies/icon_question.gif

Like every conventional automatic transmission, it uses a torque converter. The only special thing about it, is it has a cleverer lock-up clutch control.

You can clearly see the torque convertor in this image:

[snip]
Hmmyep, you're right. Uses both, then! How bizarre...
__________________
There are 10 sorts of people. Those who understand binary, and the others.
---
Weight is everything. Power is just an accessory.
idletask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 11:48 AM   #9
 
v0od0o's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 25th, 2004
Last Online: June 2nd, 2009
Location: Egyptian living in Redmond, USA
Posts: 1,618
Rep Power: 22
v0od0o has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

awesome, looks very futuristic, I doubt though that when the car finally comes out it that it will look anything like that
__________________
.
v0od0o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 12:07 PM   #10
 
andyhui01's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 4th, 2004
Last Online: August 28th, 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 20
Posts: 8,528
Car: 00' Subaru Forester GT
LFS Status: LFS Status
Rep Power: 32
andyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputationandyhui01 has between 50 and 149 reputation
Send a message via MSN to andyhui01 Send a message via Yahoo to andyhui01 Send a message via Skype™ to andyhui01 Xbox
Default

the shape resembles the eclipse... it looks like the car stopped too fast and everything shifted to the front as well images/smilies/lol.gif
The world isn't ready for such futuristic designs images/smilies/wink.gif
__________________
andyhui01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 4:27 PM   #11
 
Jostyrostelli's Avatar
 
Joined: May 29th, 2004
Last Online: April 25th, 2009
Posts: 8,062
Rep Power: 31
Jostyrostelli has between 10 and 49 reputation
Send a message via MSN to Jostyrostelli
Default

That is a really cool car, much better than that stupid SLK GTR Turbo AMG McLaren Poopcar
__________________

Your talents are not an achievement.
What you do with them is.
Owner of a 1970 Beetle 1300. (click for movies)

Water is only to do the dishes.
Jostyrostelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 5:16 PM   #12
 
Daniel's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 25th, 2004
Last Online: November 16th, 2008
Location: Stavanger - Norway
Posts: 2,337
Rep Power: 0
Daniel has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via AIM to Daniel Send a message via MSN to Daniel Send a message via Yahoo to Daniel
Default

I think the concept looks good, but I never trust manipulated photos from Autocar. I do think its about time Mercedes goes out to kick some Ferrari ass.
Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 6:31 PM   #13
 
Overheat's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 7th, 2004
Last Online: September 30th, 2008
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 5,735
Rep Power: 28
Overheat has between 250 and 349 reputationOverheat has between 250 and 349 reputationOverheat has between 250 and 349 reputation
Send a message via ICQ to Overheat Send a message via MSN to Overheat
Default

I think the front is absolutely gorgeous (bar the logo - that must fuck up aerodynamics too), but the back still needs some work. Too Alfa Romeo in my opinion. Would still love to see one on the road tho.
__________________
Overheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 8:18 PM   #14
"bangle for president"
 
bone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 14th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: belgium!!
Age: 25
Posts: 6,429
Car: yamaha banshee (and an opel astra from work)
Rep Power: 39
bone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputationbone has between 650 and 999 reputation
Send a message via MSN to bone
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idletask

Hmmyep, you're right. Uses both, then! How bizarre...
since a torque converter works with liquid, there's always some loss. a lock-up torque converter is just a little pin which bloques the two sides of the torque converter when they're going at about the same speed, to reduce the loss (=more MPG)
it's a big name for just a little thing you won't notice except for in your wallet images/smilies/wink.gif
bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 8:20 PM   #15
 
Joined: Nov 9th, 2004
Last Online: January 15th, 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 0
Wutputt has between 0 and 9 reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idletask
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutputt
Like every conventional automatic transmission, it uses a torque converter. The only special thing about it, is it has a cleverer lock-up clutch control.

You can clearly see the torque convertor in this image:

[snip]
Hmmyep, you're right. Uses both, then! How bizarre...
Automatic transmissions have been using lock-up clutches on their torque converters for years now . It's pretty normal to see a lock-up clutch been attached to a torque converter these days.

The lock-up clutch is used to lock up the torque converter when its slip is low. This way the transfer of torque bypasses the torque converter so there are no torque converter losses anymore at cruising speeds or low load situations, which improves gas mileage.


EDIT: bone was faster than me images/smilies/wink.gif
Wutputt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 9:13 PM   #16
 
Dark_Templer_102's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 17th, 2004
Last Online: 1:02 AM
Location: Alpharetta, Georgia. U.S.A
Posts: 1,677
Car: Subaru Legacy GT
Rep Power: 0
Dark_Templer_102 has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via AIM to Dark_Templer_102
Default

Well i wish they make the ME Four-Twelve first though
__________________


Dark_Templer_102 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 9:34 PM   #17
I Bought This Title :o
 
Kip_6666's Avatar
 
Joined: May 17th, 2004
Last Online: Yesterday
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 23
Posts: 3,037
Car: Saab 9-3 2.0t @ stage 3 now & Saab Viggen
Rep Power: 53
Kip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond reputeKip_6666 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I see a little veyron in the front images/smilies/tongue.gif

They could work on the back a bit.
__________________
http://www.internet-memes.com Now with 50% less database error
My Flickr
Kip_6666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 9:37 PM   #18
 
v0od0o's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 25th, 2004
Last Online: June 2nd, 2009
Location: Egyptian living in Redmond, USA
Posts: 1,618
Rep Power: 22
v0od0o has between 50 and 149 reputation
Default

The ME four-twelve sux big time! I hate the looks of that car, and that LED spree they went on when designing the lights, it's too too too vulgar!
__________________
.
v0od0o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2004, 10:48 PM   #19
Despot
 
hanasand's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 27th, 2004
Last Online: December 15th, 2008
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Age: 22
Posts: 1,300
Rep Power: 0
hanasand has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via MSN to hanasand
Default

Oh my god that McLaren looks so fucking boring I'm amazed...
Total lack of personality, might as well stick on a japanse car's logo
and we'll have a candidate for the sequel of 2F2F!... (you'll have to put on the nasty styling offcourse)
The shape is way to similar to the concept Mitsu Eclipse, and that shape
is just so... toyish. Not cool, just like a little gokart. Which means it would
probably be heavenly to drive, but so is a track-kitcar, and you don't want one do you?
__________________
"Maybe, maybe not. Maybe fuck yourself.



http://www.majestet.com
hanasand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 10th, 2004, 1:56 AM   #20
 
Dark_Templer_102's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 17th, 2004
Last Online: 1:02 AM
Location: Alpharetta, Georgia. U.S.A
Posts: 1,677
Car: Subaru Legacy GT
Rep Power: 0
Dark_Templer_102 has between 0 and 9 reputation
Send a message via AIM to Dark_Templer_102
Default

ME four-twelve does not suck...its faster then an Enzo and i think better weight/power ratio too...and 4 turbors...comeon who doesn't like QUAD? Also its got dual clutches...sweet
__________________


Dark_Templer_102 is online now   Reply With Quote
Want To Remove This Ad? Just Register For A FREE Account!
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Go Back   FinalGear.com Forums > Automotive Discussion > General Automotive
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:15 AM.
All content © FinalGear.com unless stated otherwise.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Page generated in 0.27982 seconds with 17 queries by web2
no new posts