Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 48

Thread: Practical First Car...

  1. #1
    Phix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 31st, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    626
    Rep Power
    0

    Practical First Car...

    Ok, so I'm at that point where I need my first car. Now, I have three choices... All Jap, two out of three RWD. Where I live I experience ALL the seasons. Ontario, Canada. About 10km'h s from Ajax. So dry, wet, snow and icy conditions. Now my choices are...

    '90-'93 Toyota Celica GT-S (no GT or any other garbage.)
    '80's Toyota MR2
    'late 80's-'90 Mazda RX-7 N/A (No leaky turbo mess)

    Now I really really want an MR2 but what I want to know is how difficult is MR in the winter? Would adding sandbags to the rear and/or front help at all? I've been driving since I was 14 so it's not really an issue of basic experience but more advanced drivetrain experience so has anybody ever driven M/R in the winter?

    Other than that my choices are 1) MR2 2) RX-7 N/A and 3) Celica GT-S.

  2. #2
    MXM
    MXM is offline
    old porsches do run! MXM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 9th, 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Age
    32
    Posts
    4,788
    Car(s)
    Super 7, E28
    Rep Power
    307
    Practical? Then Celica is obvious choise I think. It's the youngest, easier (cheaper) to maintain probably. But then... if you ever gonna track it, RWD is way more fun.

    I would get RX-7
    I actually drive a car with similar layout (power, weight, RWD) and didn't have any problems in Finnish winter, as long as it's wearing proper spike-tyres.

  3. #3
    mmap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 12th, 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,369
    Rep Power
    22
    The problem with the MR2 is where are you gonna add the sand bags?? there is absolute no space in the back, nothing, not even for a hot dog. And I think adding some sand in to the miniscul front "boot" would just make the rear even slippier (not that you could add more than 5kg 'cause there's no space there either).

    RX-7 great car, but let's be honest if you're going for the cheap end it'll spend more time in the service garage than on the road and wankels aren't cheap to fix (well not here anyway).

    That leaves the celica, spacious, not too fast or powerful, but still fun. Should be fairly reliable, not RWD but there's always the handrake to play with in the winter

  4. #4
    JMM
    JMM is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 16th, 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    81
    Rep Power
    0
    besides RWD cars aren't that hard to drive in the winter as long as you know the basic knowledge of driving a RWD car. So if you buy one find an empty space where you can practise a bit and you'll have no problems driving even it would be very slippery and also like MXM said tyres are very important that thet are good.

  5. #5
    Phix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 31st, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    626
    Rep Power
    0
    So I take it MR2 is not practical at all, eh? Too bad. The thing with Celicas are they're more expensive to buy than an MR2 or an RX-7 but do have cheaper insurance. Guess it'll pay me back in the long run... thanks for the info! I realize that the RX-7 is very hard to maintain but I've heard the naturally aspirated engines are very realiable as opposed to the turbocharged ones. Can anybody support/confirm/deny that?

  6. #6
    Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 25th, 2004
    Location
    Stavanger - Norway
    Posts
    2,336
    Rep Power
    23
    80's Toyota MR2. I dont know, I just like it.
    ____________________________
    Jeremy Clarkson's Online Articles

  7. #7
    andyhui01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 4th, 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    8,532
    Car(s)
    00' Subaru Forester GT
    Rep Power
    29
    Honestly... I think you should go for the Celica... try finding the 4wd version... might be more useful
    ____________________________
    OpticsCentral - Australia's Optics Superstore for Telescopes

  8. #8
    Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 25th, 2004
    Location
    Stavanger - Norway
    Posts
    2,336
    Rep Power
    23
    Celicas are good, but they look bad. New ones sweet though.
    ____________________________
    Jeremy Clarkson's Online Articles

  9. #9
    SiR_dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 5th, 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in rural Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,639
    Car(s)
    2000 Civic SiR
    Rep Power
    25
    Another vote for the Celica here.

    And yes, N/A engines are TYPICALLY more reliable than boosted. That said, a well-tuned, boosted engine will outlive an engine that some stupid kid buys big cams for, stuffs 'em in, and goes to the track with it without tuning.....proper tuning is the biggest factor in that statement.

  10. #10
    andyhui01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 4th, 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    8,532
    Car(s)
    00' Subaru Forester GT
    Rep Power
    29
    IF you are looking for reliability... I really suggest you stay away from FC3S RX-7's... you'll end up with loads of problems
    ____________________________
    OpticsCentral - Australia's Optics Superstore for Telescopes

  11. #11
    Phix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 31st, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    626
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by andyhui01
    Honestly... I think you should go for the Celica... try finding the 4wd version... might be more useful
    Those are damn rare and about 4x more expensive and more unreliable. Turbocharged 4wd '90-'93 Celica stupidly called the All-Trac (why not GT4?) edition. Nah, if I was gonna buy AWD then I'd make it either an old Audi Quattro or ... an Impreza. But those are probably way outta my price range.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 26th, 2004
    Location
    hong kong
    Posts
    5,216
    Rep Power
    0
    ST205 yeah? that car is cool

  13. #13
    zyran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 21st, 2004
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    618
    Rep Power
    0
    Whatever you do, don't get a Rolls Royce.
    ____________________________

  14. #14
    andyhui01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 4th, 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    8,532
    Car(s)
    00' Subaru Forester GT
    Rep Power
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by zyran
    Whatever you do, don't get a Rolls Royce.
    where did that come from
    ____________________________
    OpticsCentral - Australia's Optics Superstore for Telescopes

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 14th, 2004
    Posts
    81
    Rep Power
    0
    id say, depending on what youre looking to spend, you can get a really reliable 91-92 VW GTI 16v for well under 2k.....

    or go for a 93-98 VR6 for less than 5...
    ____________________________

  16. #16
    Phix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 31st, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    626
    Rep Power
    0
    I really really really REALLY wish they had Golf R32's here. I'd definietely buy one. Hm, I was thinking Golf but I'm really not a fan of the styling GTi or not. I'm definietely more performance orientated than for looks but the Golf I can't really come to terms with, unfortunatly.

  17. #17
    Overheat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 7th, 2004
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    5,739
    Rep Power
    26
    I'd definately go for the RX-7. The dual headlamp Celicas are pretty sexy but, the RX-7 just blows it away. Whatever you do, don't get the MR2 unless your are either female or a hairdresser! Might as well get a nice white one if you are though!
    ____________________________

  18. #18
    Despot hanasand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 27th, 2004
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,300
    Rep Power
    0
    Celica. Because it looks better
    ____________________________
    "Maybe, maybe not. Maybe fuck yourself.



    http://www.majestet.com

  19. #19
    Phix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 31st, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    626
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by hanasand
    Celica. Because it looks better
    heh, if i cared for looks then I wouldn't even have considered the 80's MR2's. Those were literally just boxes with an engine and four wheels.

  20. #20
    zyran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 21st, 2004
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    618
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by andyhui01
    Quote Originally Posted by zyran
    Whatever you do, don't get a Rolls Royce.
    where did that come from
    I've no idea. Must be the fasting month and the SPM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •