That's subjective, isn't it? Personally, I don't think he's perfect by any stretch of the imagination but he has done a lot of good and the country is doing very well as a result.
This is a debatable part to say the least, but it's already fully into the opinion area (well, actually many facts are there to help people defining their own opinions, but again...), so I am not interested in pointing in this direction.
I've always maintained that there are legitimate reasons to criticize him but instead people jump on bandwagons to nowhere that are based on BS.
On the bandwagons things, one of the main problems I see is many people will either go full "he's baaaaaaaad!!!" or go full "he's gooooooood" without honestly evaluating things in a balanced manner.
To you, for example, I would ask what, in Trump's behaviour (not in his political ideas) is bad behaviour and what is good. I ask because if you cannot find anything bad, it probably means you have far less problems with him that you say you have.
There are a couple of things, I don’t think it’s very fair to bear down on one specific politician due to personal/political differences when said politician is playing same game they all play. I mean Git-Mo is still around and open despite 8 years of “I will close down Git-Mo”
I think this game is dangerous, whomever plays it. It is impossible to eradicate, and probably not even really the best thing to do, but it should never be treated like it was fine, because it is not, it undermines the very things that builds up a democracy.
Rather, it should be something that lowers credibility and consensus. I see with my own eyes an everyday acceptance of dangerous behaviours (not just that), and they do exactly what you might expect they do: open the way to more overt subversion of other fundamentals, like no lies, no corruption, no empty promises, no double standard, no manipulation.
Those things should be kept in check at any time, from whatever source.
In Trump, many things are not ok for democracy at a human level and I have not even started with the political ideas. He is surely not alone, but he is in charge now, and so I see him more than the others.
He is not even the worst, I have seen some people, amongst the possible names for the presidency, who were terrifying, and the reason they are not there is because there is a "too much" which is still below their hideous level. Treat "this much" as standard, and the "too much" line will raise to include even worst people, until, one day, the line will be so inclusive you (us all) will have a real problem.