![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | iSpy | Wiki | gXboxLive | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the FinalGear.com Forums! | |
| Off-Topic Everything else! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Joined: Dec 20th, 2006
Last Online: 9:27 PM
Location: KCMO
Posts: 976
Rep Power: 44
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
okay, so I read this on another forum and it generated some good debate.
There is an airplane on a run way. The run way is like a conveyor belt, and can detect the speed of the wheels of the airplane. When the run way senses the wheels moving, the run way will move match the speed of the airplane's wheels but in the opposite direction. Can this airplane take off? Discuss. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Joined: Oct 5th, 2006
Last Online: 7:38 PM
Location: Gander Newfoundland
Age: 19
Posts: 925
Car: 1996 Ford Thunderbird - 1986 Pontiac Grand Prix
Rep Power: 20
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know the answer but I will hold it for now since nobody else posted yet
nobody wants a first post ending lol
__________________
urrgh scripted durhh |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I too know the answer, but I don't think a second post ending would be too nice either...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Joined: Dec 20th, 2006
Last Online: 9:27 PM
Location: KCMO
Posts: 976
Rep Power: 44
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
awww, dammit. I'm still undecided....lol
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Aced mod training!
|
It's also been posted before, but I'm too lazy to go look for it
__________________
"Danish is cool" - Jeremy Clarkson
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The TomTom did it.
|
The airplane will be able to take off, mainly because the wheels aren't what drives the plane forwards.
Generally, if the wheels were to power the plane, the conveyor belt moving the opposite way would cause lack of thrust, because the wheels use the belt as the surface to exert force that results in motion. In the case of this plane, which is powered by jet or turbine engines, it uses the air as the medium against which a force is exerted, which is at the same place irrelevant of the conveyor belt moving or not, so the plane will move, allowing it to take off.... ....or so I think. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Joined: Mar 4th, 2007
Last Online: 9:43 AM
Location: Israel
Age: 17
Posts: 1,547
Car: Giant Iguana / Parents' 2006 Mazda6
Rep Power: 59
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Right, I'll Explain why who thought of this idea FAILS.
Imagine yourself a Caparo T1 on that conveyor. Now imagine that conveyor is able to change its shape and transform into a corner. If you accelerate the Caparo up to 200mph and the conveyor becomes a corner, you have to turn. But "Oh no!", the Caparo doesn't have any downforce, hence it will understeer and you will wreck a 200k quid hypercar. Why it doesn't have downforce? because there isn't wind. Why there isn't any wind? Because that T1 stays exactly at the same point all that time. Air doesn't pass through all the spoilers and everything, and no downforce is produced. Same goes for the plane. No wind, no UPFORCE this time, and the plane wouldn't take off. (Go ahead, flame me for explaning )
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Joined: Oct 5th, 2006
Last Online: 7:38 PM
Location: Gander Newfoundland
Age: 19
Posts: 925
Car: 1996 Ford Thunderbird - 1986 Pontiac Grand Prix
Rep Power: 20
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
the plane would take off, I sort of follow what you're saying about the T1 but you gotta realize that the caparo is driven by wheels, the conveyor belt under the plane could be going mach 2 (assuming the wheel bearings are absolutley badass on this particular plane) but as long as some air floats through the engines, it will start to advance forward until eventually lifting off, sure the wheels might be spinning a rediculous speed but it just doesnt matter in this case just the difference between torque and thrust
__________________
urrgh scripted durhh |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I LUV MY PRIUS!!!
|
OMG here we go again!
You guys know this question can pretty much screw up a whole forum, right? So make sure you really wanna do this. Anyway, Alok has pretty much said it already. A plane is propelled by its engines. As the wheels are there only to prevent the fuselage rubbing over the ground, they play no role in the actual movement. Therefore, whatever the conveyor belt does, the plane will accelerate, reach take-off speed and leave ground.
__________________
"My next attempt to make [the Nikon 14-24mm] look bad saw me shooting at ISO400 with the Canon 5D wide open at a distance of less than three feet. I know it's wrong, but this lens just brings out my inner Ken Rockwell." - 16-9.net Got a question regarding Hi-Fi of any kind? Then check my general audio thread. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Disco Inferno
|
Just use a Harrier and take all the guesswork out of it!
__________________
D-Fence: Kajun is just outside caressing his Discovery....touching it gently, you know......it is such a dirty bitch.....but he seems to love dirty girls in high heels who are taller then him and have "quite a few pounds" on their hips ^^ This post was accidentally unearthed from a shallow grave by construction workers. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Mrs. IceBone
|
It can take of, as long as the wheels can take the incredible spin.
Why? The Jet engine moves the plane, not the wheels. It needs a stream of air with a certain speed on the wings to take off (in fact, different streams, benoulli effect). The wheels would just start to go insanely fast, because the conveyor belt would move really fast, when the plane starts moving, in reality, the wheels would possibly blow up......they do at least twice the airplane speed... Just imagine a toy car on a piece of paper on the desk. If you push it from behind and keep pulling the paper away, it still moves ![]() The only way to make it stay grounded is a fan behind the plane that keeps blowing air with the same speed the plane is moving from behind on the wings......
__________________
Last edited by D-Fence; December 11th, 2007 at 8:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Joined: Mar 4th, 2007
Last Online: 9:43 AM
Location: Israel
Age: 17
Posts: 1,547
Car: Giant Iguana / Parents' 2006 Mazda6
Rep Power: 59
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So Basically, as the plane starts to push itself, the conveyor just needs to slow down. (Quote: "The run way is like a conveyor belt, and can detect the speed of the wheels of the airplane.")
In fact, that means this conveyor is pretty useless! Apart from if it had a massive fan in the far end
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
old porsches do run!
|
Didn't whole internet go over this like 3 years ago?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I LUV MY PRIUS!!!
|
Quote:
__________________
"My next attempt to make [the Nikon 14-24mm] look bad saw me shooting at ISO400 with the Canon 5D wide open at a distance of less than three feet. I know it's wrong, but this lens just brings out my inner Ken Rockwell." - 16-9.net Got a question regarding Hi-Fi of any kind? Then check my general audio thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Just when you think people can't get any dumber....
A plane flies by air moving over its wings. You can have the wheels spinning as fast as you want on a treadmill, but no air is moving over the wings. Therefore it will never take off. The treadmill actually counters any air movement. Think about it. If it would work, why havent we retrofitted all our aircraft carriers with this incredible idea? I have seen tuna sandwiches smarter than some people in this, the worst of all internet debates of 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Neener, neener, I banned your title!
Joined: Oct 8th, 2005
Last Online: February 10th, 2010
Location: 'mericuh, someday the UK.
Age: 24
Posts: 6,859
Car: 2005 Volvo S60 R
Rep Power: 87
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes... and look where it got us.
/I'll take my plane on proper tarmac, not you're redneck treadmill. //Planes don't need exercise. ///No one can make a treadmill that big. //make believe apparently still trumps logic and reason. /...../
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Joined: Dec 10th, 2006
Last Online: 3:03 PM
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Age: 27
Posts: 1,342
Car: MINI
Rep Power: 35
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you people are such anoraks...
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Joined: Mar 4th, 2007
Last Online: 9:43 AM
Location: Israel
Age: 17
Posts: 1,547
Car: Giant Iguana / Parents' 2006 Mazda6
Rep Power: 59
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Think about it, as the plane accelerate in its way to hell the wheels spin even faster than the plane itself! so to keep them from exploding the conveyor will have to slow down. Last edited by Final Daihatsu; December 11th, 2007 at 9:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
How the hell can people think it can take off!
If the conveyor moves in a equal opposite direction, how does the plance actually move?! Its like running on a treadmill, you dont move anywhere! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||||
|
I LUV MY PRIUS!!!
|
Quote:
Congratulations! You've just initiated phase two of the destruction of this forum. Please await being flamed to initiate phase three. Correct! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: you might also wanna read this thread: http://forums.finalgear.com/showthre...light=conveyor
__________________
"My next attempt to make [the Nikon 14-24mm] look bad saw me shooting at ISO400 with the Canon 5D wide open at a distance of less than three feet. I know it's wrong, but this lens just brings out my inner Ken Rockwell." - 16-9.net Got a question regarding Hi-Fi of any kind? Then check my general audio thread. Last edited by the Interceptor; December 11th, 2007 at 9:11 PM. |
||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Airplane cockpit gauges | Spazatao | Photoshopping | 11 | July 3rd, 2007 11:26 AM |
| i jumped out of an airplane today!!!!! | patrick10 | Off-Topic | 17 | June 12th, 2005 11:22 PM |