Digital SLR users: your brand

[nomix]

Well, MF on the D40 ain't all that bad. For a studio camera, a D40x would probably be fine for nearly any task. One thing I'd like in that role would be RAW+fine jpeg, then you could use the file directly from the camera for smaller prints, or develop the NEF for bigger prints.

AF is practical, but not essential for all tasks.

[bobo_1314]

I hear Nikon is going to have a D700 mid-range camera coming out at the end of this year, and since it's going to be full-frame, I might think about upgrading my D40x. There's really nothing wrong with the D40x except it doesn't have a DOF button, which I do actually use, and a slower shutter speed of 1/4000fps, which I need something faster because my lenses are not that fast and I do take photos in a darker environment. I just hope the D700 is going to be under $3000......

[Solberg]

Rumors suggest the D700 my be out as early as July 1st.

[nomix]

'D700' should be a blast. The sensor of the Nikon D3 is an amazing one, and very 'user friendly'. It's so good at higher ISOs that you're rarely going to think about ISO noise.

[TopGearDog]

The D700 leaked info sounds interesting and i would love a camera with the D3 sensor for less price, but it's still going to cost too much for a hobbyist like me. Too bad cause the D3 sensor is just insanely good at high ISO.

I'll wait and see waht the D90 will be.

[s3r4x]

im also a pleased olympus user. After playing with E-500 few years i bought second body. The E-3 with 12-60 pro lens and that pair is incredible

[nomix]

Please stop, s3r4x, or I'll spend my total pay on an E-3. Hrmpf.

[TopGearDog]

I wouldnt mind a 12-60mm Nikon lens. Lucky git.

[mpulztracker]

Me Nikon

I bought a Nikon D40 a couple of months ago with the standard Nikkor lens

[HarLeQuiN]

I'm happy with my Canon Eos300d. Bit old, but I got the body for free a few years ago so I'm not complaining
I have a 50mm f/1.8 and a 17-85 IS USM lenses. Wish I have more money to buy more lenses!

[nomix]

The only thing I don't like with the 300D is the buffer which is really quite horrible. Other than that, it does have a very good grip. A lot better than the lump of a grip you get on the 350D/400D.

[matt2000]

Originally Posted by mpulztracker

Me Nikon

I bought a Nikon D40 a couple of months ago with the standard Nikkor lens

Lets see some of your photos.

I've probably said it before but I think Nikon D-SLRs suit beginners better.

[jmb]

Poor Sony had no votes, so I had to make my mark

[nomix]

Ah, what do you shoot jmb?

[jmb]

I've got an A100, with the kit lens plus a 70-300 I had on my old Minolta film camera - I find it does a perfectly good job!

[nomix]

I've used that combination, the IS gives it a big help.

[francis]

Originally Posted by jmb

I've got an A100, with the kit lens plus a 70-300 I had on my old Minolta film camera - I find it does a perfectly good job!

1st Sony user

I like the A-100, great color and nice camera for the price, great deal for you

[HotCooler]

I'm kinda back to the forums and I have some news! I finaly bought DSLR! Canon 400D here. Kit for some time =( But when I get used to it I think I'll buy Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens for everyday use. (budget is limited).

[nomix]

You can't go wrong with the 17-50. It's a great lens.

[TopGearDog]

Originally Posted by nomix

You can't go wrong with the 17-50. It's a great lens.

So ive heard, unfortunately it wasnt released yet when i bought my Sigma 18-50mm which apparently isnt as good. I would have to sell the Sigma first before i would buy the Tamron, as having 2 lenses in that range makes no sense.