Do you think Michael Jackson is innocent? - Page 3

Z Draci · June 14th, 2005, 09:55 AM

Were you there to see it happen? If not, just believe what the jury says.

If you think about it, Michael Jackson is a very generous man that has done a great deal of charity work for unfortunate children. The fact is that he loves and helps children in every way he can. Sick people in the media just speculate on what he might have done . . . or what they themselves would have done if they could sleep with little boys. There's no evidence of any molestation except for the testimony of those who have much to gain from his wealth.

I bet the love Michael Jackson has with children is not sexual at all. Haven't you ever cuddled and kissed a baby? How about your dog or cat? You don't see the media accusing you of baby, dog, or cat molestation! If you love something so much, you naturally do want to show effection for it. If you love something, you naturally don't want to hurt it either.

Having as much fame as Jackson, it wasn't wise for him to sleep with boys. We have a sick society where people assume weird things happen behind closed doors.

bone · June 14th, 2005, 10:30 AM

i think he's guilty, but i'm glad the jury said otherwise, just for the family that sues him. he's already the 3rd celebrity they sue for molesting a child, and already got $150 000 out of it once

Viper007Bond · June 14th, 2005, 10:39 AM

I personally believe he probably is innocent. He's just screwed up in the head, too innocent. He doesn't see anything wrong with sleeping in bed with boys and this is probably because he never had a childhood. I mean fuck, he thinks he's Peter Pan.

///M · June 14th, 2005, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyhui01

without a shadow of a doubt, he is guilty... all the charges that were against him were all true... the only reason why he isn't going to jail is because he is Michael Jackson... I think this is really unfair, just because he is some famous artist, it doesn't make him a different person, if a John Doe walked in there with an identical trial case, he would be in jail by now images/smilies/thumbdown.gif

So you were there?

How did the Jesus Juice taste?

And tell me, what parts of the case would mean that Jackson would be guilty today?

Jealousy is a weak emotion.

Lilleput · June 14th, 2005, 05:26 PM

He should have been forced into some sort of psychiatric help!

The man is a danger to him self and ofcourse his kids.

jensked · June 14th, 2005, 05:51 PM

I have absolutely no idea if he's innocent or not.

Was the jury biased or not? Was there enough evidence? Obviously not.
Can you convict a man without evidence? No. It's just the way it is. Maybe he is innocent, maybe he isn'.

swek · June 14th, 2005, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilleput

He should have been forced into some sort of psychiatric help!

The man is a danger to him self and ofcourse his kids.

You have a really strang approach on self-determination. As soon as someone differs from the "norm" he should be taken care of by the authorities ?

Last time I checked he wasn't trying to kill himself or endangering others.

jensked · June 15th, 2005, 01:10 PM

He did hold his kid out of a balcony...in front of the media.

http://www.detnews.com/pix/2002/11/20/a02jackson11.jpg

.

I'm not judging, but that was a bit dangerous / stupid.

June 14th, 2005, 09:55 AM	#41
Z Draci Joined: Mar 31st, 2005 Last Online: May 23rd, 2007 Location: Glendora/Riverside, CA Posts: 915 Rep Power: 0	Were you there to see it happen? If not, just believe what the jury says. If you think about it, Michael Jackson is a very generous man that has done a great deal of charity work for unfortunate children. The fact is that he loves and helps children in every way he can. Sick people in the media just speculate on what he might have done . . . or what they themselves would have done if they could sleep with little boys. There's no evidence of any molestation except for the testimony of those who have much to gain from his wealth. I bet the love Michael Jackson has with children is not sexual at all. Haven't you ever cuddled and kissed a baby? How about your dog or cat? You don't see the media accusing you of baby, dog, or cat molestation! If you love something so much, you naturally do want to show effection for it. If you love something, you naturally don't want to hurt it either. Having as much fame as Jackson, it wasn't wise for him to sleep with boys. We have a sick society where people assume weird things happen behind closed doors. __________________ *"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." - Sir William Lyons*

June 14th, 2005, 10:30 AM	#42
bone "bangle for president" Joined: Jan 14th, 2004 Last Online: November 27th, 2008 Location: belgium!! Age: 24 Posts: 6,069 Car: yamaha banshee (and an opel astra from work) Rep Power: 28	i think he's guilty, but i'm glad the jury said otherwise, just for the family that sues him. he's already the 3rd celebrity they sue for molesting a child, and already got $150 000 out of it once __________________ groups/artists i've seen live: coldplay, the cure, cypress hill, damian marley, deftones, depeche mode, dEUS, franz ferdinand, grandaddy, guns n' roses, interpol, jamiroquai, korn, lenny kravits, marilyn manson, massive attack, metallica, moby, muse, the pixies, placebo, prodigy, queens of the stone age, the raconteurs, radiohead, red hot chili peppers, REM, skin, tool, the who, Wu-Tang and so many more...

June 14th, 2005, 10:39 AM	#43
Viper007Bond Lazy Head Dude Joined: Sep 21st, 2003 Last Online: 03:37 PM Location: Portland, Oregon Age: 24 Posts: 20,993 Car: Dodge Viper (I wish!) Rep Power: 234	I personally believe he probably is innocent. He's just screwed up in the head, too innocent. He doesn't see anything wrong with sleeping in bed with boys and this is probably because he never had a childhood. I mean fuck, he thinks he's Peter Pan. __________________ Fight back against the evil Quiky by +1'ing this post! There is no replacement for displacement. - Wolfgang Bernhard, Chief Operating Officer, Chrysler Group talking about the Dodge Viper SRT-10 ... I ask Herb Helbig, vehicle synthesis manager for SRT and a member of the original Team Viper development group since day one, if they'd ever thought of adding traction control. "It comes with two," he says, pointing at my feet. "Learn to use them." Got it. - Motor Trend on the 2006 Dodge Viper Coupe, November 2005

June 14th, 2005, 05:26 PM	#45
Lilleput Evo-less Joined: Jun 10th, 2005 Last Online: 03:12 PM Location: United Kingdom of Denmark Age: 25 Posts: 2,901 Car: Ford S-Max Titanium - 268hp Rep Power: 70	He should have been forced into some sort of psychiatric help! The man is a danger to him self and ofcourse his kids. __________________

June 14th, 2005, 05:51 PM	#46
jensked Joined: Mar 31st, 2005 Last Online: 11:54 AM Location: Flanders, Belgium Age: 25 Posts: 3,993 Car: RIP Opel Astra -> 2006 Toyota Corolla Wagon Rep Power: 40	I have absolutely no idea if he's innocent or not. Was the jury biased or not? Was there enough evidence? Obviously not. Can you convict a man without evidence? No. It's just the way it is. Maybe he is innocent, maybe he isn'. __________________

June 15th, 2005, 01:10 PM	#48
jensked Joined: Mar 31st, 2005 Last Online: 11:54 AM Location: Flanders, Belgium Age: 25 Posts: 3,993 Car: RIP Opel Astra -> 2006 Toyota Corolla Wagon Rep Power: 40	He did hold his kid out of a balcony...in front of the media. . I'm not judging, but that was a bit dangerous / stupid. __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search