LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteI would take that gun I found and kill those baddies who stole my TV a year ago!! actually in some neighborhoods in Chicago, it is advised to own one of those. lol.
123Absolutely, the guy should have called the police, or at least mentioned what he was bringing in. But well-meaning stupidity isn't worth a five year sentence.
0I would take that gun I found and kill those baddies who stole my TV a year ago!! actually in some neighborhoods in Chicago, it is advised to own one of those. lol.
208Question: At what point exactly did he actually have possession? Is it a Schroedinger's cat thing, so long as he does not open the bag he is OK. At that point he is in possession of a bag, as soon as he opens it and knows what is in it he has committed the offence as he is then in possession of the weapon? So to know what he is in possession of automatically makes him guilty - human rights act here we come!
54That's why (afaik) we currently have an amnesty for owners of illegal weapons (as long as you hand it over to the police voluntarily). Because you have to keep in mind just how easy it is to find a gun "by accident". Be it old WW2 weapons hidden inside of a barn or just "forgotten" hunting guns by grandparents which were reported lost
Originally Posted by IceBone
124You guys know where I stand, which should give gravity to my words when I say... WHAT THE BLOODY FUCK!
I think I've said enough.
26
Interesting way to look at it. Also, the article said he found it in his own backyard, so even if the he called up police saying "hey, you know, funny thing, I just accidentally found a shotgun in my backyard, come pick it up." Wouldn't that be classified as "being in possession" of the weapon anyway?
356
Doubtful; why would he call the police to take something he owned away?
193Re-fucking-tarded. Honestly, encouraging people to bring these weapons to the police should be the priority, not arresting them because they worded their phone call badly.
123This is the nub of the matter. He was deemed in possession, due to the fact that he had hold of it. The law normally has mens rea - criminal mind/intent. However, because this and so many laws have been rammed through without thinking, this law has strict liability. He brought it in, he has possession, the law says possession is illegal, he has broken the law.
Kind of like the proposed ban on religious hate speech, which would have banned "The Passion of the Christ" and "Schindlers List".
458
It happens here all the time, actually. People find firearms when going through belongs of relatives, in old storage boxes, that kind of thing, and don't know what to do with them. Many just take them by the police station and drop them off instead of trying to sell them.
In Richmond I got rid of one of my pistols and had a bunch of leftover ammo. I just walked over to the police station and asked if they could please dispose of it for me. I then handed the desk clerk a bag of ammunition and went on my way. No questions, no ID, just "Hey, this stuff can be dangerous, can you take it?"
The guy could have handled it better. He could have dialed 999 or called the station's non-emergency line as soon as he discovered it was a firearm. Still, at that point he had brought it inside his home so he still might have gotten charged.
The problem here is a lack of personal responsibility. The UK seems so worried that people will make the wrong choice that they have tried to legislate away any choice at all. What they are saying with this law is that anyone who touches a firearm intends to commit a crime.
Touching a firearm is a crime
You intended to touch it, therefore you intended to commit a crime.
People already have little personal accountability or sense of responsibility, they go through life expecting others (companies, governments, the police) to keep them from harm and protect them from themselves. Most warning labels are so idiotic that it makes my brain bleed, but they are there because someone was dumb enough to use a hairdryer in the shower. Here you have a guy who has taken personal responsibility for making his neighborhood safer (yes, I know it was in his garden, but you never know when someone will come back for the gun), and he's prosecuted as a criminal. He's even a soldier! The state trained him how to handle firearms for fuck's sake!
356
Interestingly enough, had he just listened to Eddie Eagle, all of this could have been avoided.
458
"tell an adult"
He's a friggin' soldier! How much more "adult" can you get?
356
Well... the first two, anyway.
"Tell an adult" might fall into "Tell the police when you're on the phone with them", though.
21
That is absolutely insane. What a miscarriage of justice.
78
Those "soldiers" that I see everyday are not even close to being adults.
(^joke)
Anyway, don't you guys in Britain have anything called the spirit of the law or something like that?
Here if an individual is charged for breaking a law in a way the lawmakers didn't mean, charges can be dropped.
130
I imagine a few of those still show up even to this day in peoples basements etc
124I don't care if he did it stupidly. We all make mistakes, and putting the guy in jail for that is just moronic.
40
No, the article states that he took the case into his home before he opened it realising it was a weapon.
He should have phoned the cops after he opened in inside his house.
124Yes, he should. But he didn't, and he did something really rather silly.
Stupid? Criminally stupid? God no. Prison? Hell no.
458
Somehow I don't think that would have made any difference. He picked up the gun and brought it inside. Even if he did call the police at that time they would have arrived to find him with the firearm in his home. Hell, it sounds like if he opened it in the garden and called then he might still go to jail because it's on his property.
I'm not crediting the UK Criminal Justice system with an overabundance of brains at this point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
