Nanny State News: Coastguardsman fired for daring rescue - Health & Safety Violation

[Blind_Io]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

Coastguard sacked for daring clifftop rescue of 13-year-old schoolgirl
as boss says: 'We don't want dead heroes' By CHRIS BROOKE
When coastguard Paul Waugh carried out a daring clifftop rescue to save a 13-year-old girl's life he was hailed as a hero and honoured with bravery awards.

But bosses at the Maritime and Coastguard Agency were not so impressed with the lifesaver's actions because he ignored health and safety rules by not using safety equipment and following correct procedures.
Far from heaping praise on the dedicated volunteer, Mr Waugh said he has been put under "immense pressure" from management and treated terribly.
Now, a year after risking his own life to save the teenager, the 44-year-old has announced that he has been forced to quit the job after 13 years dedicated service.

Mr Waugh, of Skelton Green, East Cleveland, said: "The way I have been treated is terrible. I loved that job and I am absolutely gutted that I am leaving.
"A girl's life was in imminent danger and I did what I had to to save her life. Saving that girl was all that mattered, the cliff edge was crumbling and it was a 300 foot drop down.
"But my bosses didn't see it that way - they said I should have waited for support and safety equipment. They criticised me and even said I was under investigation, but I didn't have time to wait for back up.
"I never thought I could get into trouble for just doing my job and what I thought was right. I couldn't have lived with myself if I had waited any longer and she had fallen to her death."
Mr Waugh, who has also won an award for his selfless charity fundraising work, added: "I thought I would be a coastguard for life, but I couldn't carry on being treated so badly.
"I loved doing it but now I have a bitter taste about it all."
The decision has caused outrage in a coastal community where Mr Waugh is regarded as a true hero.
But the coastguard has defended its hard-line attitude towards the volunteer lifesaver with the comment that they are "not looking for dead heroes".
The incident happened on 14 January last year when schoolgirl Faye Harrison, 13, and three friends were out walking and clambered down cliffs to get to the beach.
They found themselves trapped as darkness set in and Faye tried to climb back up to get help.
She became trapped on a cliff ledge which began to crumble and was left clinging for her life, holding on to tufts of grass.
The other girls managed to alert a fisherman who dialled 999 and the Skinningrove coastguard team were despatched to the scene.
Realising the urgency of the situation, Mr Waugh inched his way down to Faye without using ropes or a harness.
By the time he reached her, she had been stranded for 45 minutes and had been mentally planning her own funeral.
He put his arms around her to reassure her she would not fall and after a further 30 minutes the teenager was winched to safety by a rescue helicopter.


Ironically, it was the second time Mr Waugh had saved Faye. The year before she became trapped by the tide while out with her cousins on a beach.
The schoolgirl of Saltburn-by-the-Sea, now 14, has been left furious about Mr Waugh's plight.
She said: "I am disgusted by the way Paul has been treated. If he hadn't been brave enough to climb down to me I don't think I would be here today. Paul is a hero."
Mr Waugh, who is married to Sue, 40, and has three children, Laura, 17, Sally, 16, and Rosie, eight, was named Hero of the Year after the daring rescue, won a Vodafone lifesaver award and was nominated for another award run by a national newspaper.
He is also a carer for his wife who has a neurological disease.
A spokesman for the coastguard agency said: "We wish Paul well in his future endeavours and the MCA is very grateful for his past activities and work in the Coastguard Rescue Service.
"However, the MCA is very mindful of health and safety regulations which are in place for very good reasons.
"Above all our responsibility is to maintain the health and welfare of those who we sometimes ask to go out in difficult and challenging conditions to effect rescues.
"The MCA is not looking for dead heroes. As such, we ask our volunteers to risk assess the situations they and the injured or distressed person find themselves in, and to ensure that whatever action they take does not put anyone in further danger.
"We are proud of our safety record and we will seek to maintain the safety of our volunteers, and minimise risk in what can be inherently difficult situations."

So how long before firefighters won't be allowed in burning buildings?

[thedguy]

So he puts his own life at risk, and no one else, but is still forced to leave the coast guard on account that he seems to care more about other peoples lives than his own?

Not quite sure what to say about that.

[Vette Boss]

That is the most ridiculous thing I've heard.. the man is a hero for saving a girl on a cliff.. and he gets fired for it!

Not long before firemen aren't allowed to do their job, Blind.

[Night_Hawk]

usually when I read these nanny state stories I just type something like " im sure glad I dont live there" in a joking way

but this... what the fuck?

[Cobol74]

And in another nanny state exclusive:

Barmy fire chiefs came under a blaze of criticism today after they banned the traditional fireman's pole - because it posed a 'health and safety hazard'.
Firefighters risk their lives every day but bosses overseeing the construction of a new £2.4 million station ruled the poles are too dangerous.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

[petarkb]

Everyone in that management should be fired, every single one of them. If you're more concerned about your safety than the lives of people, you shouldn't be working in rescue business. There are enough "sensible" jobs out there.

[Twerp128]

"Wait, wait, Paul! You can't save that girl without your lucky roll of red tape."

[KaJuN]

It's shocking to see that his superiors have no compassion for human life and only care about rules and procedures.

[BerserkerCatSplat]

Originally Posted by KaJuN

It's shocking to see that his superiors have no compassion for human life and only care about rules and procedures.

I'm thinking less "no compassion for human life" and more along the lines of "fetish for high-visibility jackets."

[Blind_Io]

It's because the people in charge are bureaucrats, it seems that the UK is over run with the sniviling little shits. If they had promoted someone who came up through the ranks this guy would be getting a parade and a raise instead of a pink slip and a box to clean out his locker.

This is a disgrace, not just to the UK, but to humanity.

[epp_b]

ffgsdlf;k;s'lfkg;' fiRF){*F S})fjs dfsdfkldfnfjk;s fjsd;fjsdfiojsigojfg hdf;oighdiofhs dfoh {f09y8dojaljio[erujokdn,mxnv, xhpuy349579345793457894hsndf; jkdhp9S9-34y5jnjk[89798@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




I have nothing more to say.

[Peter3hg]

Disgraceful

[LeMans GTR]

Unbeleivable...

[American TG Man]

Originally Posted by LeMans GTR

Unbelievable...

x2

Really makes me worried about where the western civilization is going to end up with acts like this...

[Gman333-X-ferrari]

So, what is the bloody coast guard trying to do by sacking him? Disciplining him so that he doesn't save people's lives in the future? Preposterous...

[narin]

so um... what's the coast guard suppose to be there for?

it troubles me to think that there are people out there who rather see that girl die

[Viper007Bond]

Yet another reason I won't be moving to the UK. Damn bureaucrats.

[AlexmanDK]

Can you guys imaging health and safety regulations in their army then?