The Incredible Shrinking City

[jetsetter]

(CNN)

The Incredible Shrinking City
Youngstown, Ohio, has long been on the decline and now is being hit by the foreclosure crisis. Its answer: Razing abandoned buildings and tearing up streets.

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (CNNMoney.com) -- Youngstown, Ohio, has seen its population shrink by more than half over the past 40 years, leaving behind huge swaths of empty homes, streets and neighborhoods.

Now, in a radical move, the city - which has suffered since the steel industry left town and jobs dried up - is bulldozing abandoned buildings, tearing up blighted streets and converting entire blocks into open green spaces. More than 1,000 structures have been demolished so far.

Under the initiative, dubbed Plan 2010, city officials are also monitoring thinly-populated blocks. When only one or two occupied homes remain, the city offers incentives - up to $50,000 in grants - for those home owners to move, so that the entire area can be razed. The city will save by cutting back on services like garbage pick-ups and street lighting in deserted areas.

"When I grew up in the 1950s, the city was at its peak," said Father Ed Noga, who heads St. Patrick's on Youngstown's South Side. "There were kids everywhere and everyone converged on downtown. You went to eat, to shop and to go to the movies."

Today, downtown is positively sleepy and even somewhat derelict. Residents have to drive out of town to shop for clothes or housewares. And while foreclosures have long been a scourge in this city, they have recently skyrocketed along with the rest of the country, up 178% in February from a year ago.

"Abandoned houses here are like rainfall in the spring," said Mayor Jay Williams, "That has gone on for decades."

Growth strategy failed
For a while, Youngstown, with its population at just over 80,000, hoped to return to its boomtown roots, when 165,000 residents called it home.

"We long pursued a policy of growth," said the city's energetic young mayor. "We went after all these things that would make Youngstown a city of 150,000 again."

There were some harebrained schemes.

"A blimp factory was going to put the city back on the map," Williams said. "That represents a whole lot of the promises made and broken. They sound ridiculous now. President Clinton promised a defense facility employing 5,000. We were waiting for a savior."

They never got one. But now, Youngstown's infrastructure-paring strategy may yet become a model for other Rust-Belt cities that must recreate themselves after years of decline.

Already, delegations from smaller, post-industrial cities like Flint, Mich.; Wheeling, W.Va.; and Dayton, Ohio, have come to Youngstown to study the plan.

"We're one of the first cities of significant size in the United States to embrace shrinkage," said Williams.

It's an odd way to pioneer. "The American narrative always includes growth," said Hunter Morrison, Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Studies at Youngstown State University, which works closely with the city on plan 2010's implementation. "No one wants to talk about shrinkage. That's too threatening to politicians, civic boosters and Chambers of Commerce."

The demolitions can yield stark contrasts. In many neighborhoods, blocks have more empty lots than buildings.

Glory days
Even wealthy neighborhoods, like the North Side historic district, where mill owners and upper management once congregated, have eyesores.

On one corner, there sits a beautifully maintained seven-bedroom Tudor, yet down a side street, a wood-framed colonial is boarded up. Next door, an empty Victorian sits moldering, the wood of its window frames scorched. Lines of old hedges mark lot boundaries where once-proud homes stood.

Youngstown used to be the nation's third-largest steel producer; its mill workers earned among the highest factory wages in America. Demand for their services was strong.

"You could graduate from high school one day and start work in the mills the next," said Noga.

That changed on Sept. 19, 1977 - Black Monday - when Youngstown Sheet and Tube abruptly closed its doors.

"Five thousand people showed up for work one day and were turned away," said Phil Kidd, Downtown Director of Events and Special Projects for the city.

"The city lost its heart and soul," said Mayor Williams.

Within years, all the mills vanished. Noga recalls seeing idled workers watching as one of the oldest blast furnaces in the valley was dynamited. "I saw these hard men, shot-and-a-beer guys, standing there crying," he said.

The city's East Side stands as a totem to Youngstown's glory days. This mostly empty land was readied for development just after World War II - when streets, water and sewer service, signs and utility poles were installed.

But growth never came, and that makes for some strange city streetscapes today. There are few occupied homes and unkempt woodlands have taken over. There's at least one 10-acre farm and many other large fields.

Some dead-end streets are already uninhabitated and torn up, their outlets blocked with concrete barriers. Many roads are pitted and potholed; drivers have to slalom slowly through or face axle-busting jolts. Lonely water hydrants look woefully out of place sitting on the sides of rural-looking roads.

Today, a new spirit seems to have taken hold. Phil Kidd started the Web site Defend Youngstown, and said he hears from tons of former residents who would like to return.

"They call and email from all over the United States with suggestions on how to help," he said.

A fresh start
"I'm very nervous to have all that space," said Elsa Higby, the founder of Grow Youngstown, which promotes produce gardening and farmers markets. "I'm used to living in 460 square feet."

Ideally, all this energy surrounding 2010 will help turn the city around. It does have a lot going for it, including Youngstown State University, which attracts creative-class types like artists and writers and other intellectuals, as well as museums and an excellent public library.

The cheap residential and commercial real estate can be a draw. Start-up companies thrive on low overhead, and employees can easily find housing just minutes from work.

At the very least, the 2010 plan has changed residents' perspective, said Hunter Morrison. "It's getting us to think about where we're going into the future, rather than where we've been in the past."

An interesting approach to say the least.

[KaJuN]

I'm surprised I didn't hear of this before. The plan does make sense though. Today's big cities didn't start out big, they grew to the sizes they are now. So it's only logical to think that they can only be rebuilt by downsizing first.

[JipJopJones]

Sounds like a good idea to me... more trees in the world certainly won't harm anyone.

[fbc]

I like the idea - sure as hell better then leaving those areas to just decay and make the whole town look bad.

[Whappeh]

I wish more cities would do this.

[NooDle]

Originally Posted by Whappeh

I wish more cities would do this.

Yeah, this could solve the CO2 problem aswell if enough cities did this. Nice read

[Scooby5]

Whoever thought a sensible idea could have been born in Ohio

[tigger]

Originally Posted by NooDle

Yeah, this could solve the CO2 problem as well if enough cities did this. Nice read.

How?

[hansvonaxion]

Leave the roads, hold road racing events!
Make money from whats there.

[Crazyjeeper]

Originally Posted by hansvonaxion

Leave the roads, hold road racing events!
Make money from whats there.

Actually, I would pay to be able to tear around city streets like NFS underground.

[argatoga]

Interesting, reminds me of Akron, OH. Although their response seems to be just letting the university buy out all the land.

Originally Posted by NooDle

Yeah, this could solve the CO2 problem aswell if enough cities did this. Nice read

What?

[NooDle]

Originally Posted by argatoga

What?

destroy unused buildings, plant trees
trees use up CO2 and give out O2 (oxygen)
less CO2 in the atmosphere = less global warming

[VillageIdiot]

I doubt it would solve the problem, I mean the outskirts of cities are a tiny fraction of the whole world...

unless you mean every major city/town did this

[hansvonaxion]

Originally Posted by VillageIdiot

I doubt it would solve the problem, I mean the outskirts of cities are a tiny fraction of the whole world...

unless you mean every major city/town did this

Yes. Everyone lives in a treehouse.

Unrelated, but I can't believe we've only just begun thinking about "green" buildings, with living plants on the outside to keep the temperature constant on the inside and the outside, more oxygen etc. Major metropolises like where I live should almost be subterranian, every building having a roof top garden would solve so many problems. Then you have water catchment and possibly using the water flow for small power generation, the list goes on.

[NooDle]

yup.
treehouses for the win!

[argatoga]

Originally Posted by NooDle

destroy unused buildings, plant trees
trees use up CO2 and give out O2 (oxygen)
less CO2 in the atmosphere = less global warming

It wouldn't make much of a difference. We have more forests today than 100 years ago, thanks to the lumber industry and tree farming, and it hasn't made a noticeable difference.

[NooDle]

Originally Posted by argatoga

It wouldn't make much of a difference. We have more forests today than 100 years ago, thanks to the lumber industry and tree farming, and it hasn't made a noticeable difference.

I know, it would only work on a massive scale, and we just can't plant trees all over every city.

We're screwed.

[tigger]

Originally Posted by NooDle

destroy unused buildings, plant trees
trees use up CO2 and give out O2 (oxygen)
less CO2 in the atmosphere = less global warming

Tearing down buildings and ripping up streets, sewers and water mains requires heavy machinery. Machinery that measures fuel consumption in gallons-per-hour. Then any building materials that aren't recycled (if any are at all) have to be either burned or put in a landfill. Then the earth movers come in and reshape the land. Then you can plant some trees.

Originally Posted by hansvonaxion

Unrelated, but I can't believe we've only just begun thinking about "green" buildings, with living plants on the outside to keep the temperature constant on the inside and the outside, more oxygen etc. Major metropolises like where I live should almost be subterranian, every building having a roof top garden would solve so many problems. Then you have water catchment and possibly using the water flow for small power generation, the list goes on.

Those are some neat ideas, but they would also require some pretty big changes in construction practices. And modification/removal of current structures. For instance, given enough time, vines destroy brick work. Some roofs may not be strong enough (or water tight enough) to support a couple feet of topsoil. Etc etc.

Originally Posted by NooDle

We're screwed.

Easy there, gloom and doom. Quit watching so much CNN . The earth has always gone through phases of heating and cooling, from ice enveloping much of the earth to being so warm there was almost no ice anywhere. I don't think we've done anything more than slightly accelerated a naturally occurring phenomenon.