I have been watching Top Gear since the first season. The one thing in this episode that got me mad is the M3 vs Prius. A Prius is meant to save gas with a combo of highway and stop and go. Since most people have a stop and go type drive why not do that vs the M3 and see who gets the better results. It seems like they will do anything to make cars they like appear better than anything even if it means looking absurd
I think you have a misunderstanding of a lot of things here.
1. How the prius is marketed. (They almost sucked me in)
2. The Prius pro people want everyone in a prius type vehicle
3. Apparently you have not seen the rural parts of the country. Most people do not do stop and go driving where I live.
Not to mention those batteries. Do you know everyone that lived near those mines in Canada had to be moved. It is now a dead zone, meaning nothing grows/lives around it. (very eco friendly)
So it boils down to, if I had bought one of those cars, I would be highly pissed at this point. That test they did on TG would be a more a real life test in my case than the crap they ram down your throat at Toyota or the eco web sites.
I am not against a fuel efficient car which is why after I really thought about it I bought a Honda Civic. (I average 43 miles to the gallon) I know the car is not really cool, and it is a grandma car, but I was looking at most cost effiencient. And it was a good choice. Good fuel economy, it's roomy, comfortable to drive and the battery will not cost me $3000 to replace. Plus it was right at $10,000 cheaper than the prius was going to be.
If you want a prius, you need to look deeper than the crap they try to feed you. If you sit in trafic half the day, probably a good car for you. If that is the only thing you use it for. Interstate driving would kill you. (as TG proved) My closest town has one redlight. The next town has 3. I don't spend much of my driving time sitting still or barely moving.
If I ever move, I may give it another look.