Dr_Grip
Made from concentrate
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 15,215
- Location
- HEL
- Car(s)
- 79 Opel Kadett|72 Ford Country Sedan|03 Volvo XC70
Were there some dodgy tactics from BrawnGP? Can someone explain the situation in a nutshell? Rubens didn't look that happy.
I'll explain it for a second time, as it is cloddered up in multiple posts:
Both Brawns were on Ruben's three-stop strategy, as Ross Brawn figured their car would be in another universe than the competiton when light enough.
As Ruben's times from the second stint show, he was dead right about this.
Anyways, Jenson got some seconds behind Rubens and Brawn's calculations predicted that on a three-stop strategy, Jenson would get held up in traffic, so they switched him to two-stop (it was on TV: "We had to switched Jenson to Plan A. Now you got to make it work", in other words, they had no hope for Jenson at this point).
Sadly, Ruben's tires in the third stint did not work at all, so instead of being around a second faster than the competition, he suddenly lost .3 to .4 secs per round.
Luckily for Brawn GP, Sutil got held up behind Massa, so Jenson could take the lead after all.
At least, that's Brawn's official version and apart from the "bad tires" bit, which might be a bad excuse from Ruben's side, i have no reason to question it.