This poll is flawed.
TGUK is a far more refined, mature product than TGA. A far more appropriate poll wouldn?t be due until after TGA 1x08 has aired, and at that stage the poll would be something along the lines of ?Which was better: TGA Series 1 or TGUK Series 3?.
How is TGUK more refined or mature? Do you think so only because it's 5+ years old? The reason everyone votes for TGUK is because they're already fans of it and are biased, and can't see its flows, and exalt it for no reason at all. The last 2-3 seasons were very weak imo. And I actually think it was better in earlier seasons than in the last ones. I watched them all again from the S1E1 just several months ago. I loved the first few seasons most (except for that annoying fat guy from 1st season with his sensible consumer advice). If anything, TGUK has deteriorated severely in the last few years:
- less focus on cars, more on politics and BS
- formulaic, dull reviews (the car is so bad bad bad.... *pause*... but when you turn the traction control off.... this car is good good good good... but i still don't like it) The humor in reviews is long since gone. The first few years were funny, but now they're just borderline boring.
- horrible news section talking about rubbish (makes me cringe a lot)
- strained humor, I can't stand presenters having a visibly unnatural, forced laugh at unfunny jokes and not knowing when to stop explaining them
- dull, ponderous, obviously scripted challenges (fox challenge, german race, or car vs skies, bicycle, parachute, whatever)
- epic episodes (like Japan) being a snooze-fest
Maybe I'm not a fanboy, and that's why I don't have bias, and thus am able to enjoy TGA a lot more. Because at least it started exactly where TGUK started (and what made it so good) - at being a good strictly car-focused show catered to car enthusiasts rather than a show about nothing with some car featured once in a while.