Spectre
The Deported
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 36,832
- Location
- Dallas, Texas
- Car(s)
- 00 4Runner | 02 919 | 87 XJ6 | 86 CB700SC
Blame Obama all you want - though he wasn't the only one foolish enough to bail them out - but he wasn't there when Whitacre pulled the same stunt at AT&T. It is, of course, a case of patterns of behavior being ignored, and you're correct about that. However, he would have pulled that stunt no matter how he weaseled his way into the top spot. There was some professional level weaseling going on.
Whitacre wasn't working for GM at the time so he wouldn't have been able to weasel his way to the top. In fact, he wasn't working for anyone at the time. He was Obama's hand picked choice for the position after he fired Rick Wagoner.
If Obama didn't know about Whitacre's past, that says something about the man. If Obama knew about it and went ahead anyway, that says something too. So, which is it?
As for the "unlimited government funds" you keep going on about, the government doesn't have unlimited funds for being a government, let alone an increasingly unpopular bailout plan. Obama is going to try to wash his hands of this as soon as possible because it's proved unpopular, and there will be attempts to make people forget soon so it becomes a non-issue during the next election. GM's unlimited government funds will dry up slowly, until Ontario's ridiculous Volt subsidies are all that remains.
If he's going to try to wash his hands of it, why did his administration just bail out GMAC again not 14 days ago??
No. As Obama laid all the prior faults at the feet of Rick Wagoner (rightly or wrongly), we can and must lay all the faults of the company under his stewardship at Obama's feet.
Last edited: