That's just plain funny coming from you. But for the sake of keeping this thread about what its supposed to be, I'll leave you be. Your statement that you can't understand why anyone would use the best lens nikon can offer on a DX body really says everything there is to say about your intelligence as far as camera equipment goes :lol:
OH NOES THEY DISSIN' MAH LENSES
But, since you seem to enjoy being the butthurt victim here, I'll point out
again that I never once said I didn't know why
anyone would use it on DX, since you evidently have the reading comprehension of a preschooler. I said it didn't make sense for Alok to be using it on DX (and hence looking at DX reviews), and (later, once you brought it up) how it doesn't float my personal boat on DX. Your name was included as a joke, but since you're calling me out I'll play ball. Let's look at some brilliant markryder advice! This came from when he'd owned a telephoto IS lens for a whole
two hours!
Concider the pictures you've already taken without IS: are they all perfectly sharp, or do you often come home with slightly blurry pictures? That's all you really need to think about. If you suffer from blurry pictures, get IS. If all your pictures are sharp - why bother with IS?
Oh, yeah, if your photos ain't sharp, you totally need IS! I have trouble expressing how monumentally stupid this advice was. Before throwing out lame comments at me, maybe you should grab half a brain first.
You could have left my name compleatly out of it, and it still would have been the moronic mess it is, and I still would have commented on it. So get over yourself.
:lol: Yeah, we all believe
that one. Then again, with the pitiably low level of competence and reading comprehension you've displayed here, maybe you would have. Either way, you're still being a butthurt, whiny drama queen. You can cry all you want, but nobody was hating on you or your precious 14-24 to begin with. That was all in your head, it's just a shame you seem to enjoy being a victim so much.