Global warming a scam? Hacked Hadley data might suggest so.

as mind blowing as this all is.... its just not going to make it into the public view. mainstream media like the BBC simply wont report it. they'll just act like it never happened and hope to god it goes away.

Indeed, I just found out about this topic today by accident (by accident I mean looking through www.terrorstorm.com for the 1st time in several months)! And my job involves reading and following news around the globe (or at least in Europe). I'm really surprised the news outlets didn't pick up on this more vigorously.

Although, this confirms what I've been suspecting after seeing the Great Global Warming Swindle, that the "green scientists" were cooking the books in order to show results they wanted. I mean I work with financial models on daily basis, which in essence is similar to forecasting anything and you don't even have to try hard to make these models show what you want. So in the case of the warmists, it is very much in their interest to adjust their numbers to get funding/prizes/recognition/news coverage/etc.

But there's a second side to the story, as many others here have said I'm as well all for saving energy and diversifying away from fossil fuels, but climate change has turned into a war on terror global warming - a fight against invisible and unbeatable enemy, which can last for decades and fill so many pockets...
 
Last edited:
http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=118625&page=15

wow, user Eleua probably has the best take on the whole shooting match

Here is your answer.

AGW zealots are not the least bit interested in global warming, just as early 20th Century Communists were not the least bit interested in worker's rights, hippies in world peace, animal rights whack-os in animal cruelty, feminists in womens' dignity, homeless advocates in alleviating poverty, etc.

All of these groups (essentially the same people) have one goal: more meddlesome government where national or global socialism contains all political power and they run it. Socialism (however you peddle it) is essentially the modern version of feudalism, where elites run and own everything and all of us 'little people' have to beg on bended knee for our lords to vouchsafe us our basic needs. National Health Care anyone?

The American Founding Fathers wrote our Constitution with Feudalism in mind, not necessarily Adolph Hitler types (although they did manage to temporarily inoculate us against those types as well). Go read our founding documents and you will see references to Euro-feudalism.

That's why the rich love socialism. It consolidates their power. A vibrant and independent middle class is anathema to feudalism.

Now, here is another question to ponder.

What would the response be if, rather than AGW fraud being exposed, the hackers were able to hack some oil/coal company computer bank and release emails concerning evidence of carbon-based, human caused GW and their attempt to cover it up? [****storm]

The Nobel Committee is an obvious joke.

i actually couldnt agree more. this AGW stuff isnt about GW or the planet at all.... its about those already incharge leveraging more power and more wealth
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jay
That's an excellent take on it. It's a religion and a wealth transfer scheme with the desired end result being the same as the Catholic Church's in the Dark Ages of Europe - total control of everything.

One of my cousins made out like a bandit on this - he formed a carbon credit trading consortium in Europe, made about $30 million out of it, then sold out. He never has believed in AGW, but he knew how to talk the talk and make boatloads of money doing it.
 
Last edited:
One of my cousins made out like a bandit on this - he formed a carbon credit trading consortium in Europe, made about $30 million out of it, then sold out. He never has believed in AGW, but he knew how to talk the talk and make boatloads of money doing it.

Don't know about you, but people who intentionally manufacture a misleading hype/theory and those who knowingly play by the dirty rules for their own benefit fall in the same category in my view.
 
I didn't say I liked the guy.

However, it should help explain my position on the matter - and that I have personal knowledge that this is a wealth transfer scheme.
 
I didn't say I liked the guy.

However, it should help explain my position on the matter - and that I have personal knowledge that this is a wealth transfer scheme.

Well fair enough, but I didn't actually mean to imply anything :)
 
Top