why is it that there are a lot more scientists who criticize the relatively unknown "great global warming swindle" than scientists who criticize "an inconvenient truth"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reactions_from_scientists
the producers of "the great global warming swindle" even deliberately misrepresented scientists who they interviewed for this "documentary"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Carl_Wunsch_controversy
oh and they had "scientists" in this "documentary" which are known to have been paid for by the tobacco industry to spin the truth for them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer
because its trendy as hell to go with the flow, and that flow is the enviremental movement, plus have you even looked at the claims of inaccuracy, i did because i wanted to make sure i wasn't watching a bullshit program, and what i found was all of the inaccuracies were stupid pin pricks in comparison to what you hear alot of GW enthusiasts (thats what im calling them now) talk about
Carl Wunsch-He only had 3 freaking lines in the documentary if i remember right, and he never specifically said anything about global warming, so i don't see how he was mis-represented, and either-way its not like they drugged him
The graphs- i looked at the supposed falsified graph and the graph its based off of, the only difference i saw was that the one in the straightened out as to look less crazy, it was more the mean score of every year rather the exact detail of every day (which does look messy as hell)
Gore-the fact that Al Gores main point is completely bassackwards kinda defeats all of his credibility, of course why would anybody question somebody who is going with the trend, he must be right, right?
Sun spots- furthermore i read reaction portrayed by many prominent scientist (frighteningly) , for example the debate on cosmic rays which greenies use to dislodge the theory of the sun-spots heating up the earth, if you do even a second of research you'll find that sun-spots (the things climatologists actually relate to earth temperatures, not just "cosmic rays" which is a generaly term for all cosmic rays) actually create something called a forbish decrease, which essentially means the solar wind sweeps away the other cosmic rays, and what hits earth is mostly just they solar rays.
Basically its nuts to say sunspots aren't related to global temperature because of current trends in cosmic rays, because the two are very different in their effects on earth and your not even talking about the same thing
Fred Singer-One bad apple in the bunch doesn't mean the rest of the scientists are worthless, its worth keeping in mind all the people in the movie that originally were for global warming, as well as they enviroment, and now seem proof positive that anthropogenic global warming is exaggerated bullcrap