Does that mean we now have to like Piers Morgan? :shock:
Here's your dunce hat, now go stand in the corner!
Does that mean we now have to like Piers Morgan? :shock:
You know, it does bring up an issue: it's possible that the 10+episode series format was in fact the wrong way to go.
It may have made network and syndication executives happy, but to maintain the quality and energy of the presenters and production team that might have been too much.
Remember the vociferous arguments that Stephen Moffat made when some BBC whiteshirt mused about getting more episodes of Sherlock into a series? TG may be running into the same thing. I'll bet the expenses and logistics costs must have shot up astronomically since the 2003 relaunch (what with foreign travel, challenges, and so on.)
Could TG fans settle for 2 series per year, 6 eps each with a 6-8 month break, instead of one massive season?
In his Sunday Times column this week, he says, "I used to work on a television show called Top Gear..."
http://www.topgearlive.com/norway/en/Top Gear Live regret to inform ticket holders for next week?s shows in Stavanger, Norway that we will be postponing all 4 performances, with rescheduled dates for later this year to be confirmed within the next fortnight. We sincerely apologise for the inconvenience this will cause fans and we will endeavour to contact all ticket holders directly to inform them of the change of dates.
For the Conservatives, Maria Miller (who thinks Jeremy Clarkson is ?a legend?) said: ?The BBC needs to be better at managing its talent.? For Labour, Chi Onwurah (who thinks Jeremy Clarkson ?doesn?t represent or understand today?s Britain?) said ?Where he fits into the BBC?s remit is really difficult to understand.?
Chi Onwurah?s comments are particularly annoying because Jeremy Clarkson patently does ?represent and understand today?s Britain? ? the exact, substantial part of today?s Britain that the Labour party currently doesn?t.
Onwurah, an obviously bright woman, can?t possibly have failed to notice Clarkson?s popular rhetoric and vast national fan base, so her gist can only be that those people don?t matter.
That?s an exasperating approach from a member of parliament, before you even get to the bizarre conclusion that failing to represent Britain (or the Britain that matters) makes ?where he fits into the BBC?s remit? really difficult to understand?.
Is it? Difficult? The BBC has a remit to inform and entertain. Clarkson does both. That is not complicated.
I remember when Howard Stern left traditional radio for Sirius...and by 2014, he tied with Simon Cowell for the highest earning celebrity personalities with some $95 million.
Stern was targeted for years by the FCC; the U.S. government's version of the Gestapo. I think that as of 2004, the FCC had fined radio station licensees that carried his show something in the order of two and a half million dollars for "indecent content".
Maybe Ramsay is the new Top ******* Gear catering manager who will sort everything out!
Maybe Ramsay is the new Top ******* Gear catering manager who will sort everything out!
Someone should do a poll "Is Clarkson getting:
a. sacked
b. out of Dodge
c. reinstated
d. fish n chips (the cod)
e. all of the above"
They have. Season 1 episode 9. They cooked food on car engines and got him to taste it.
RadioTimes.com understands that the BBC boss has made it clear that the decision over Clarkson will be made by Hall alone in his capacity as the Corporation's editor-in-chief.
This follows reported tensions between Hall and the BBC's director of television Danny Cohen, who is thought to have pushed for harsher sanctions against Clarkson when dealing with Top Gear controversies over the past twelve months, but been overruled.