I suppose it happened in the aftermath of the Soviet Union. In the old days, no one who stepped down from the top job could return. Putin just proved that democracy can give him another term, the Soviet system couldn't have.I think it's interesting that while you can only two consecutive Presidencies, so long as you do something after wards, you're free to run for it again.
Indeed. Here in the US our law is just as ambiguous on that. No more than two consecutive terms but no explicit ban on becoming president again after a term off. But people weren't sure whether or not there could still be grounds for a legal challenge. Obviously there are no such concerns in Russia.I think it's interesting that while you can only two consecutive Presidencies, so long as you do something after wards, you're free to run for it again.
Whoever is responsible should be fined for defacing such a lovely rack.
Hm. One "consultant who has issued advice to local authorities" comes up with this idea, the Torygraph writes a critical article about it and suddenly, "it is now unwise to use white paper because of 'racism'" in all of GB? That's a jump to a conclusion that not even Nick Griffin could get away with.From Great Britain, the stronghold of political correctness. It is now unwise to use white paper because of "racism", the little word that has become so overused in the last years it is ridiculous.
(...)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/educatio...o-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html
I am sorry if my obvious hyperbole was lost on you. But to wake the sleeping people of Britain one needs to exaggerate.Hm. One "consultant who has issued advice to local authorities" comes up with this idea, the Torygraph writes a critical article about it and suddenly, "it is now unwise to use white paper because of 'racism'" in all of GB? That's a jump to a conclusion that not even Nick Griffin could get away with.
I think it's interesting that while you can only two consecutive Presidencies, so long as you do something after wards, you're free to run for it again.
So, with 'sleeping people', do you mean 'sleeping from the dangers of multiculturalism'? Just asking, sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth.I am sorry if my obvious hyperbole was lost on you. But to wake the sleeping people of Britain one needs to exaggerate.
:lol: Yeah, right. I'm German, by the way.I am sorry if my obvious hyperbole was lost on you. But to wake the sleeping people of Britain one needs to exaggerate.
Sadly, nothing will change. You can be as much of a thug as you desire as long as you wear a uniform and don't "accidentally kill" (i.e. brutally murder) a "violent resister" (i.e. an outnumbered, unarmed civilian) of the Caucasian race. Exceptions occur once a decade.
From Great Britain, the stronghold of political correctness. It is now unwise to use white paper because of "racism", the little word that has become so overused in the last years it is ridiculous. "Equality experts", that must be the new word for propaganda ministers. In Sweden we have a similar problem. Here a Finnish company called Fazer has banned a candy called "China-puffs" because an adopted Korean (yes you read it right, Korean) said that it was discriminating to use a fun picure of a chinaman in a rice hat as a logo for the candy. This sparked an outrage on the freedom-of-speech forum called Flashback, which has 500k members. Our own propaganda ministry called "Aftonbladet" then posted a blog entry that specifically said:"White people have no right to say what is racism and what is not racism.". I am sorry but this PC bullshit has gone way out of damn hand and I am deeply disturbed by this crap.
I am glad that what seems to be the only reasonable newspaper in the GB, The Telegraph is publishing this article. Much like "Svenska Dagbladet" in Sweden you have at least one good news aggregator.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/educatio...o-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html
Sadly, nothing will change. You can be as much of a thug as you desire as long as you wear a uniform and don't "accidentally kill" (i.e. brutally murder) a "violent resister" (i.e. an outnumbered, unarmed civilian) of the Caucasian race. Exceptions occur once a decade.
Media reporting might however change something if it, too, changes. Less "Hero policemen race lunatic car thief on the public highway, WATCH IT LIVE!" might help, for instance. I do believe there are some who think that certain protesters deserve every kind of violence of which they become the victims, but the minds of normal people might be swayed.I don't know if something will change.
What I know, though, is, that giving in with a sigh and surrender to the status quo will definitely change nothing.
It can change, if the following paramaters are met:Sadly, nothing will change. You can be as much of a thug as you desire as long as you wear a uniform and don't "accidentally kill" (i.e. brutally murder) a "violent resister" (i.e. an outnumbered, unarmed civilian) of the Caucasian race. Exceptions occur once a decade.
What the...? I don't even....[Snip, video...]