Tea Party candidate: Masturbation is the same as adultery

What remains to be seen is if conservatives liberals can keep up this PR strategy of taking victories away from Obama Bush and giving him their failures.
Care to cite any examples?
 
She won? Fucking hell. Faith in humanity far into the negative.
 
I bet she's into some kinky-ass stuff, and possibly kinky ass-stuff.

Thats just in your imagination :p

I can see how she'd become the next Sarah Palin in porn though. Talk abour irony :lol:
 
Last edited:
Does this mean I'm having an affair with MWF? :eek:


I can see how she'd become the next Sarah Palin in porn though. Talk abour irony :lol:

Christine O'Donnell In the Ass 1-15 are being filmed later tonight.
 
Last edited:
Thats just in your imagination :p

I can see how she'd become the next Sarah Palin in porn though. Talk abour irony :lol:

O'Donnell and Palin, at the same time, covered in syrup.
 
http://img339.imageshack.**/img339/6890/thread20is20going.jpg
 
Socialist Canadian maple syrup just to piss them off.

apc.jpg


Except with syrup. And licking instead of punching. So really completely different apart from the eating communism bit.
 
Care to cite any examples?

To be honest I don't really feel like it. Don't feel the urge to convince people Bush wasn't that bad just as much as I don't feel like convincing other people Obama isn't that bad either. It's like fighting a brick wall in most cases.

So lets just agree that the Tea Party are extremist, self-indulgent wankers, syrup, etc.
 
I bet she's into some kinky-ass stuff, and possibly kinky ass-stuff.

I wouldn't doubt it, it really does seem the more they scream about "family values" and all that other crap the more perverted they end up being.
 
But that relies on people pulling their heads out of their asses. If they had that capacity, there wouldn't be a tea party movement in the first place.
I agree, but so far all we've seen is that there are enough of them to screw up some primaries. I'm interested in seeing what happens when you put candidates like O'Donnell in a general election. For example, Castle had that senate seat. He was polling at least 10% better than Coons. But right now, 50% of Delaware would vote for Coons over O'Donnell. And only 35% said they would cast a vote for her. That's a bigger deficit than she overcame to win the primary.

Dogbert said:
This entire year, at least, has laid the groundwork for it being acceptable to blame Obama for everything wrong in America.
While it does seem more out of hand than usual, this happens with every president. The interesting thing to me is that the far right isn't just going after the president, but what they see as RINOs too. Shit, Hannity, Rush, Palin and Malkin are going after Karl Rove after his comments about O'Donnell on Hannity's show. Karl motherfucking Rove, The Architect, Turdblossom is now not conservative enough.

He didn't even say anything bad about O'Donnell, he just tried to give a dose of reality to the teabaggers. O'Donnell is not electable, there are too many skeletons in her closet, too many unanswered questions about her. Funny that many of the pundits who love to spout about how independent and free thinking Republicans are have been telling Rove (and others with his opinion) that he needs to "buck up" (Palin), swallow his tongue and support O'Donnell.

Dogbert said:
And in the "burning Koran" thread, you even see people from Islamic countries burning effigies of Obama, despite him not being associated with that.
I've got two theories on that;

1) In general, Muslim nations possess much stronger central leadership (both in secular and religious power structures). These structures exercise much greater influence and direct control over the day to day lives of individuals. Because of this, less-educated individuals expect that the same must be true elsewhere. They expect central leadership to have influence and control over all facets of society and individual actions. So, in this case, they blame Obama for the Koran burning that never happened.

2) They just like to set shit on fire. Who doesn't, right?


The ironic thing is, I bet she is awesome in bed.
:lol: The crazy ones usually are. As for blatantly/intentionally offensive O'Donnell porn, you guys realize that the Delaware election is now Coons versus O'Donnell, right? I'll leave it at that.

/nonPC neg rep here I come!
 
I love the fact that this woman thinks pre-marital sex is a sin yet she is in her 40's and has never been married...
 
That would mean that unless she is a newborn Christian she is not that awesome in bed. :D
 
While it does seem more out of hand than usual, this happens with every president. The interesting thing to me is that the far right isn't just going after the president, but what they see as RINOs too. Shit, Hannity, Rush, Palin and Malkin are going after Karl Rove after his comments about O'Donnell on Hannity's show. Karl motherfucking Rove, The Architect, Turdblossom is now not conservative enough.
There might be something more general to that.

Tea partiers hate "the Washington insiders", right? Karl Rove made the Republican establishment. He's the "Washington insider". It makes perfect sense for them to go against him, if you think about it.
 
That would mean that unless she is a newborn Christian she is not that awesome in bed. :D
She probably does meth with hookers on the weekend. :lol:

There might be something more general to that.

Tea partiers hate "the Washington insiders", right? Karl Rove made the Republican establishment. He's the "Washington insider". It makes perfect sense for them to go against him, if you think about it.
I can see that. There are probably a number of people who've been waiting for an opportunity to rail on him. This just gave them a reason. Gave people an opportunity to show how cool and teabaggery they are, railing against the Beltway insider.

Of course he's now completely walked back his comments like a good party hack, claiming that O'Donnell can win and saying he got the NRSC to give O'Donnell 42 grand.
 
Top