QUANTITIES IN TEXT
You are banned for questioning the idea of length as a status symbol in terms of the aspect of text. The simple matter is, length is quantity, and therefore mutually exclusive as opposed to quality. Or is it? In order to find an answer to this dillema, this post looks at the relationship between literature and word count, and the automatic assumption that a thicker book is of a higher intellectual standard. By doing so, the relationship between the two aspects of quantity and quality are assessed.
Consider this, in order to include the various ideas and idioms that structure a piece of text of any genre, whether it may be fiction or instructional, the length of the text is increased. Does this mean that quantity and quality are equal? Not quite. In many journalistic standards such as reviews and articles, a specific word count is set as the maximum for spatial issues. By the logic previously mentioned, this should therefore decrease the quality of the work, and what can be included. It could be argued that in actual fact the word count limits the choice of the writer in terms of usage of persuasive language, but even so, writers manage to overcome this through the act of compression, which brings onto the next point.
Whilst it may be true that addition of information increases the amount of text to carry out this information, the wording of the information can be altered. In other words, information can be stretched out or just the opposite, compressed. This is an example:
1. The brown cat lived at No.22.
2. The cat, that was brown, resided at the house number No.22.
As seen above, both sentences carry the same information with no new information introduced. Yet the second sentence is longer. This...
Ah forget it, I haven't got the time.
EDIT: Now look, I'm two posts late.