GRtak
Forum Addict
Does that include tax evasion?
The whole CNN panel with Wolf Blitzer says "this is a huge victory for Trump, its over".
I think that says it all...
agree with Prizrak.
So if collusion or obstruction can NOT be proven, do you agree this should be dropped and everyone should move on?
Report recommends no further indictments.
Considering the entire investigation started off the back of the fraudulent Steele dossier that was paid for by the Clinton campaign, and managed to reveal genuine dirt on the partisanship of no less than the FBI (Strzok and Page), with nothing to tie Trump to Russian interference, this was a resounding failure for the search of collusion between Trump and Russia. Not even with the disgusting level of bias on part of the bureau could they find anything to even suggest Trumo acted improperly in this regard.There is the possibility that another crime that could warrant his impeachment.
There are already 34, how many more would you like? (6 from Trump camp)
That recommendation doesn't prevent further action for the DOJ. That would probably be further investigations at this point.
Not a single arrest for collusion, not a single arrest for obstruction.There are already 34, how many more would you like? (6 from Trump camp)
bUt He LoSt ThE pOpUlAr VoTe
OrAnGe MaN bAd
This has always been simply about hatred for Trump. It's why you can already see the left downplaying the report and gearing up for new attacks - GRtak is already calling for "further investigation", though I'm not sure into what. The amusing part is that not that long ago the left was complaining that the right wouldn't let go of the email investigation where there was actual misconduct yet here they are grasping at straws.
Not a single arrest for collusion, not a single arrest for obstruction.
I would think this was a day of celebration, all over the US. The report everyone has been waiting on, by the man everyone trusts, says that Your president is not a traitor, he isn't working for the Russians. And neither is Don jr, Jared or Ivanka!
I'm actually not sure how that would work. A sitting president cannot be indicted so he has to be impeached first and removed from office.I think it would need to be a crime that occurred either while in office or that gave him an advantage getting into office. Past tax evasion should be prosecuted, but it wouldn't necessarily be impeachable unless the fraud benefited Trump's campaign, or he benefited while in office.
That's not a DOJ policy, that's in the constitution.The policy of the Justice Department is that a sitting president cannot be indicted.