Did you just call two immigrants xenophobic?
Yes, this is what astonishes me most of all.
So...do you want to present something plausible to justify the reactions of sanctuary city reps or will you just continue to accuse everyone not just quietly accepting it of being an ignorant racist idiot? I'm not even in the US or addressed in your post and yet somehow I still felt somewhat alluded. Maybe it's the ad hominem at the reasonable point about C-suite not knowing the circumstances of all of their employees. Or the accusation that boils down to "If you were so smart, you would think the way I do", which strikes me at kinda insulting and not propitiatory to discussion.
I fear that bringing any valid points to the table will just get steamrolled with "You're racist" or "Why don't you just accept this?". Admittedly that last one should be used on flat-earthers and anti-vaxxers, but it tends to rob political discussions of a certain everything.
Here's the thing. There's no actual plan behind the "sanctuary city" bullcrap. It's just a blank statement without any grounding. What is a sanctuary city? Whats the status of the so called "illegals" once they arrive? Are they now legal? Are they free to roam? Are they to be confined to a make shift ghetto while they wait to be deported? If they're not legal, and are left free to roam, if (and when) some of them get out of these cities and go look for employment anywhere else in the US, who's liable for their escape?
There's no actual proposal, just "take them, it's your problem now". Certainly convenient, isn't it, after many reports of the kind of inhumane conditions they're being kept at the "camps".
You are the one with all the mental gymnastics here, you think that THE OWNER OF A COMPANY has any clue as to the legal status of his workers? He has an entire HR department to deal with all that along with line managers and so on. There are plenty of bad things you could say about Trump as a person/businessman/politician to not have to resort to this kind of stupidity.
I'm sure he knew nothing at all about it, he never does, about anything at all, when it's something that he failed at, it's never his fault. Unless of course it's later discovered that the problem was no problem at all, in which case, he was on it all the time from the beginning and deserves all credit for whatever positive outcome.
Bugger off.
Here's the real tea:
The reason there's illegal immigration and drug trafficking is one and the same: there's demand for it in the US. If nobody was giving jobs to illegal immigrants, it would quite quickly die down, but of course, saving some money on hands and taxes is always a very tempting proposition for any capitalist. The same way, if you legalized immigrants quickly and swiftly, employers would have to pay them legal wages and pay taxes and benefits and all the other bits and bobs, they wouldn't be cheap anymore, they would be in competition with locals and soon enough the problem would be greatly diminished. But of course "muh job", will never happen. Build a wall that would accomplish nothing, that's better.
The drugs problem is the same, either you decrease the demand (highly unlikely) or you legalize/decriminalize and start treating drug abuse as a public health issue and not a public crime, it
works much better. But of course, no, "muh war on drugs".