No they're not.
These Vancouver Olympics are setting a new standard for fail. The sliding track. Inadequate off track protection for the athletes. Placing the public cauldron in a fenced off, secure area. The weather delays (not their fault of course). Equipment failures. Being forced to cancel tickets to some events for "safety issues." Inadequate practice time for everyone NOT wearing the Maple Leaf. Inadequate conditions for some events.
They had 7 fucking years to put these Games together. They're making it look like they put this together in 6 weeks. What a joke.
The only people who can control the weather are the Chinese (at least that's what they want you to think). Oooohhhh yyeeeaaaahhh it's totally VANOC's fault that there's shitty weather and El Nino. Inadequate practice time? Oh so you mean we should have shared the facilities with the whole world for the last couple years? Fuck off. Everyone has their own facilities, these are Canada's facilities, where the Canadian teams practice. The world cup went to Vancouver/Whistler last year. Every country does the same thing because the host country's athletes need to practice just as much as every other country's athletes who all hog their facilities. We're only getting shit for everything because everyone thinks that because we're Canada you can just shit all over us and we'll say thank you. Well fuck you.
To the above question ^
I feel like it really depends on what your expectations were going into the event (ie. your world ranking). If someone came 1st in the worlds that year you'd think they were clearly aiming for Gold. Now lets say it's your first Olympics and you're the underdog who wins Silver, you're probably ecstatic.
Also: For events that come down to 2 finalists (ice hockey) I suppose a team would "lose Gold", but they could also "win Bronze"
just my two pennies...
Exactly. And it depends on the competiton too. The silver medalists behind Shawn White or Lindsay Vonn are probably thinking "well, I got beat by the best. What are you going to do?"