narf
Sgt. Maj. Buzzkill
Also, ridiculously bad black values from anything except the correct angle.
My dad pointed out to me how red it looks in those photos. It's much more of a metallic burgundy and it looks way better with the darker red. I'll get pics.
Nope. I'm quoting the F-Body Fools who say that. All I have to say about that is that if it was so completely superior, why didn't it sell?
MY2001 F-body sales, all versions: 42,131 Camaros, about 31,000 Firebirds/TAs.
MY2001 Mustang sales, all versions: 158,106 V6, GT (V8) and Bullitt models, 7251 Cobras.
Down here in this latitude, cars with the E9 paint code appear as pretty much the color in the first picture set - due to the brighter sunlight.
Nothing wrong with that, I rather like Laser Red on that car.
Give it up Spectre, he will always be blinded and closed minded. This is like Ferrari owners saying Lamborghini sucks just because they have slightly less performance for less money. Bullshit.
Fact is, I'd rather have the Mustang V8 in any trim vs the Camaro. The only 4th gen Fbody that I REALLY like is a WS6 Trans-Am and only in certain colors. I'd still take a 2001 Cobra or 2003/2004 Mach 1 over that though. I'm tired of Fbody lackies bringing down the rest of their brethren with their propaganda.
1999 Ford Mustang GT
260 hp @ 5,250 rpm
300 ft-lbs. @ 4,000 rpm
Curb Weight: 3,200lbs
0-60mph: 5.4s - 5.6s (various sources)
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
350bhp @ 5,200 RPM
335tq @ 4,000 RPM
Curb Weight: 3,400lbs
0-60mph: 5.2s - 5.5s (various sources)
FTFY. GM Underrated the LS1 cars like crazy to avoid comparos with the Corvette.
See below:
View attachment 4775
:lol:
I knew that, I left it out simply to avoid the inevitable argument from him. This even makes my point even stronger since that quoted power was for the SS not Z28 anyway. The SS was "rated" at 325bhp anyway according to some magazines of the period.
Nope. I'm quoting the F-Body Fools who say that. All I have to say about that is that if it was so completely superior, why didn't it sell?
MY2001 F-body sales, all versions: 42,131 Camaros, about 31,000 Firebirds/TAs.
MY2001 Mustang sales, all versions: 158,106 V6, GT (V8) and Bullitt models, 7251 Cobras.
Coming from a Corsica, an old man pushing him in a wheelchair would be more powerful
Give it up Spectre, he will always be blinded and closed minded. This is like Ferrari owners saying Lamborghini sucks just because they have slightly less performance for less money. Bullshit.
Fact is, I'd rather have the Mustang V8 in any trim vs the Camaro. The only 4th gen Fbody that I REALLY like is a WS6 Trans-Am and only in certain colors. I'd still take a 2001 Cobra or 2003/2004 Mach 1 over that though. I'm tired of Fbody lackies bringing down the rest of their brethren with their propaganda.
Again, I'm tired of his ilk and all the anti-Mustang propaganda stating that "2V's suck" when it's clear they do not suck. His precious Z28 Fbody with its superior power numbers only manages a few tenths quicker on the 60mph and maybe half a second on the ?mi time. If the Fbody would of been around in 2003 the SVT Cobra would of waxed the floor with it. As it is the Mach 1 gives the '02 4th gens a run for their money with significantly less power.
Can we please not start up with this shit again? I bought a Mustang, not a Camaro.
2v 4.6's can run hard!
Now where are some damn videos of the car in action?!
Vids or ban! :lol:
I have to say that's a very nice finish on the paint, must have been detailed recently. Just promise you won't get all obsessed about cleaning and polishing it like that other dude with a Lazer Red Mustang.
What's an ass idea?That's a really good ass idea!
What's an ass idea?
$9500. Good fun for the money.
:lol: It kinda is, but then again it is a 10 year old car (style, etc.). Seats are comfortable though!