Forum-wide survey: How oomphy is your ride?

Well, it's not the least powerful, nor does it have the least power/weight. It does have the least torque/weight, though, so that's something!
its-something.jpg
 
You can drop my E46 and add Mini: 2004 Mini Cooper S, 1598cc, 170hp, 220Nm, 1140kg kerb weight, supercharged.
 
For the sake of sillyness, have the Cadi:

1994 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham, 5733 ccm, 260hp, 450Nm and 2044 mere kilograms (or 2.78 public Polos) of curb weight.
 
That's actually better than what I thought it'd be. Unless you sort by power/displacement. :p
 
I'm still absolutely at loss with kW as a measure of power. My in-head-reference is still hp and hp/ton so I do miss these badly on the spreadsheet. :(
 
That's quite the bump up. And I keep dropping place. :(

So far, the only big bump is the torkwe. Supposedly it stays there from 1500 to 4400rpm :burnrubber: only just broke 1000km yesterday, so still taking it slow.
You kept the Eos' fuel consumption though :( that's potentially the other big bump, with the fancy new engine generation, less weight, stop-start, free-wheeling DSG... and a bit worse aero, but no matter in topless mode.


Re: hp - can we at least have metric hp? :tease:
 
Last edited:
Have another list for previously owned vehicles?
 
Top