Lens Flair

4211683169_a255867b99_o.jpg
 
a bit late, but murry chrissmiss. A slightly blurry Barkly enjoys the smooth flavour of a plastic bone in the warmth of holiday fireplace (had that on all day)

http://img706.imageshack.**/img706/8779/murry.jpg
 
a short reminder to everyone: backup your data !
i just lost the last half year of my pictures.. and all because i was to lazy to backup my picture s lately :(

so all i can do now is taking new pictures or play a bit in photoshop with old pictures, which i did:
749855989_ykEcb-O.jpg
 
4215001125_5127e661ba_o.jpg


100% cropped magnification
your photos look good and stuff but franklly I'm expecting more from a man with so much expensive gear on his hands
 
It's all about location, location, location..and owning at least one cute animal.
 
Money doesn't buy talent. Look at epp_b. He has a D40 and produces much better pictures.
My toughts exactly.;) But still...so much money should buy at least some.
6e4940e0d39cc4dc87c6bfcce735b346.jpg
 
Last edited:
https://pic.armedcats.net/t/th/the_interceptor/2009/12/26/scrabble.jpg
 
Stop being harsh about evoWALO's work, there's no right or wrong in the way you do things, I'm sure people that are interested in the moon would find such photographs highly arousing and super-cool. The problem is that I don't think the moon looks all that interesting, even in the golden hour it's probably not much better. From a technical perspective I think it's pretty cool to be able to get so close to the moon but I can't help wishing that evoWALO would spend his millions on taking these beastly lenses on safari :p.

Less moon, more lions!
 
I'm sure people that are interested in the moon would find such photographs highly arousing and super-cool.!

I'm one of them. I love moon shots and I wish I had a lens which could get that much detail. My photo library would surely be double the size then. :p

Quite pleased with this shot despite it being a little accidental.
 
Top