Dr_Q
Well-Known Member
That guy is my new hero, he also takes electric shocks like a champ.
After a few minutes of watching him ruin a camera, I really wished the capacitor shock had hospitalized him.
All this actually makes me think about ... are you ready for it? ... switching to a Canon setup.
I've been really aching to upgrade my body since the D40 locks me out of a lot of lenses (for autofocus). But, recently, I've been thinking about just how long Nikon is going to keep their AF-D lineup before deprecating it and if it's really even worth it go out and buy a bunch of AF-D lenses. Then, I see something like this ... and I was seriously thinking about this lens in particular.
All this actually makes me think about ... are you ready for it? ... switching to a Canon setup.
Maybe I'm just over-thinking this. Are AF-D lenses worth investing in at this point?
A question about gradient filters.
I would like to take more landscape photos, but do not want the sky to be blown out, or the landscape too dark; obviously I would want a ND gradient filter. Any recommendations? my size is 67mm.
A question about gradient filters.
I would like to take more landscape photos, but do not want the sky to be blown out, or the landscape too dark; obviously I would want a ND gradient filter. Any recommendations? my size is 67mm.
Somehow, I knew you were going to chirp inJoin the Rebel Alliance. We have universal AF and metering, no matter the lens, and a modern lens mount system, not some antiquated doodad with springs and screws. And first party lenses that aren't massively overpriced for no real reason (seriously, why the bloody hell does the 17-55/2.8 DX cost $1500 USD and it doesn't even have VR. And it doesn't even perform as well as Canon's 17-55, which is $500 USD cheaper and has IS. Seriously, Nikon, seriously.)