I guess not. That's TEPCO for you, by all accounts.Seriously......does anyone still know what exactly is going on, like anyone in the world? Every damn newssource is coming with something different every 5 minutes.
Middle-Europe? That is quite far from nuke tests.
For those who haven't guessed, the high point in the mid-sixties is marked "nuclear weapon testing".
And yet, the nuke tests were so far the greatest nuclear health risk to the general population.
That is still very low figure. Currently we in Finland get a dose of 3.7 mSv/year.
Is that the total annual dose or the annual dose attributed to nuke tests?
All three Reactors are in cold shutdown according to the IAEA. The spent fuel pond fire is out, and lasted only two hours. Barring any future incidents like the fire, the Fukushima incident is basically over.
All three Reactors are in cold shutdown according to the IAEA. The spent fuel pond fire is out, and lasted only two hours. Barring any future incidents like the fire, the Fukushima incident is basically over.
Total, x-ray's and all. That's only from atmosphere?
More info on stuff like this? Was nuclear weapons testing really this harmful? I expected some impact, but not that large level, especially compared to Chernobyl.
The image I posted is the dose attributed to human nuclear stuff, ie regular power plant operation, weapons, oopsies.
The overall annual dose these days is about 2mSv/a from natural sources and about 2mSv/a from human sources. Of that, medical examinations are the largest bit with about 1.9mSv/a on average.
Currently, human nuclear stuff is rated at pretty much nothing: "< 0,01 mSv/a" for regular plant operation, "< 0,016 mSv/a" for Chernobyl, "< 0,01 mSv/a" for nuke tests.
That sounds like how my boss would phrase it.Going down by that factor in a few hours means there was an oopsie, but that oopsie did not continue to go oops.
That sounds like how my boss would phrase it.