^ That's frickin' awesome!
That sense of speed gets lost so much on television and then after awhile you start to go "meh, i could probably do that". Then you see something like that and shit yourself.
Get iRacing and try it.
Then don't sit in your living room in a sofa with a can of beer
and if you are competitive in iRacing with that setup, I'll make you a frikken statue...
Thankyou for prooving my point.
If anything that article prooves Simulated racing is no match for real life racing.
That article prooves that it is possible to learn tracks and how a car behaves in simulators.
But do it in real life and you're in huge troubles.
Once again, thank you.
Please go back and read pages 7, 8 and 9 of that article.
I wish you good luck taking a F1 flat out through Eau Rouge, if you ever get that chance.
But are you actually sayng that a gamer, who can take a F1 car through Eau Rouge in a game, can do that in real life too?
I've read all of that article months ago when it came out.
Basically what you're saying is that a guy with good physical condition (like, say a marathon runner) can race better than a guy with fast reflexes, good hand-foot-eye coordination and natural talent for racing (which can stand out even in simulated racing)?
Yes, he could, and the article proves it. You didn't ask if he could complete a 50 lap race, you asked if he could.
Also something that wasn't mentioned in this article but that was mentioned in the guy's personal recount of his experience was that he got sick during the days he was doing his testing. He got a flu or something.
There's no doubt a normal peron can learn the THEORY of how to take corners and how a car should be driven when in a race.
Foget 50 laps. In a 2 lap race, a professional / experienced racing driver would be miles ahead of a virtual racer. There's no way a gamer could possibly keep up.
I do not think it is possible for a gamer to learn to take a Formula 1 car through Eau Rouge flat out in real life simply by playing games.