And yet, ours worked fine with 57hp of pure naturally aspirated 1.7 diesel goodness. Worked in the alps as well, also on skiing vacation in Norway (with chains, obviously). If you're worried about snow/off-road capabiltiy there's always the Syncro:
*awesome Syncro*
mmm, Syncro goodness! :nods:
Remember though, diesel's have gobs of low down torque, gas engines don't fare as well. Overall, most Americans judge acceleration by the seat of the pants feeling as they leave the dealership parking lot on the test drive/pull away from stoplights, etc. It's one reason why the unusually heavy 1st gen USDM Kia Sedona has a ultra low first gear-It feels frisky in town but can lose steam on the highway when it's time to pass.
Ours was a 5/6-seater, so there never was any problem acessing any seat. The sixth seat was optional, and only bolted in when needed / unbolted when the space was needed. If this is your entrance to the three back seats, who needs another door?
*interior shot*
You can see the additional cupholder and ashtray to the right of the foldaway table, this is where the sixth seat would be if bolted in.
In fact, we rarely used the front doors. Open the big sliding door, everyone piles in, go.
Nice, digging your photos btw! Here in the state's there was always two seats in the second row...either rear facing on MV models (The ones with the table and stuff) or front facing on GLS trims. This matches most every other van sold here. The advantage of having a driver's side door here is that not only can larger families enter/exit the van faster, but parents no longer need to climb way into the van to strap a kid into a child seat if they're in the second row. Most families I knew with minivans, us included, put the younger kids in the 2nd row to keep an eye on them, and let the teens/older kids get in the third row.
I do agree though that if you'll use the camping features, having the configuration that you had is the best.
Yeah, I see lots of people proud of their smart foldaway/removeable seats. Do they ever remove the seats?
Did we ever feel the need to remove any seat (apart from the sixth optional one)?
With the engine in the back, folding the rear bench gave a wonderful space for large flat stuff such as furniture. Leaving the bench up gave a nice space in the middle and back for bulky stuff.
With the front-engined models I see some point in removing the rear bench though because the old engine bay becomes much more usable that way.
*storage space*
The advantage of having a fold away third row seat is that you don't need to think about where to put it- If you decide on a whim during a trip to pick up something (or if its bigger than you thought) you can simply pull two to three straps and bam...seat's gone! Same with the 2nd row on current and previous generation Chrysler vans:
When the seats are up, you get a deep storage well that's perfect for storing items that are bulky like strollers and sports bags. You can even get storage bins for the storage wells that allow for "two-tier" loading a la Eurovan:
http://img217.imageshack.**/img217/64/underfloorstorage.png
We removed the seats in our Grand Voyager many a time, each time was easy and w/out tools.
If you must know... the 2l biturbo diesel Multivan starts at 48000? over here. Jeremy had its predecessor, larger capacity but only one turbo and six horsepower less.
You can get one for 60000? without any extras specced yet, that'd be the 2l biturbo diesel 7-speed DSG *deep breath* 4MOTION Multivan Highline... after checking a lot of optional extras you're fast approaching 90000?
I'd love a Multivan PanAmericana: Off-roadable minivan?.....yes please!
Closer to home, responding to the Espace worked well enough. There's the T5 if you want a boxy jack of all trades. There's the Sharan if you want a large family van (US: "minivan"). There's the Touran if you want a mid-sized family van. There's the Caddy Life if you want a small family van. Some Caddy models even come with a tent that's integrated into the boot lid.
I wish they would have either given us a stretched Touran (better yet offer two sizes) or the refreshed Caddy Life and Caddy Maxi Life:
Make that third row slide fore and aft a bit for leg room and I think they would have had a winner, esp. with a TDI
Yep..its clear...I'm a van nerd...
I always thought that the EuroVan's lack of success in the US market had less to do with it being underpowered (Being underpowered didn't seem to hurt the T1-T3/Vanagon models any) than the fact that it was overpriced. VW tried to price it competitively, but in order to do that they had to remove a lot of equipment that was standard in US minivans. Also, where the Caravan & Voyager were low enough to fit in the average suburban garage, the EuroVan had to stay in the driveway. It also drove more like a full size van (Even after adding the 201hp VR6 in 2001) and less like a car - another key selling point for the Chrysler minivans.
Volkswagen had 7 years to respond to the Chrysler minivans (And closer to home, the Renault Espace) and they decided to go their own way. But unfortunately what worked in 1953 did not work in 1993.
At launch in 93, the Eurovan's pricetag actually
undercut the competition. It was when they relaunched it in 99 that they screwed the pooch with the pricing: A base GLS started at 32k...that was upper mid trim Odyssey, T&C, and Sienna money. Only reason I could see this was because this launch was right when the whole "VW is premium" thing began, that and possibly exchange rate. In 2002, they adjusted pricing to a much more reasonable 25k, right in the thick of it with Odyssey and Sienna base trims.