Poor M5

Wow, this nearly brought a tear to my eye. Sure, insurance will cover most of it, but seeing something like this happen to your own car must scar for life.:cry:

I'm really glad for the support groups in Facebook and the people rallying up their support in these sorta cases. There might be some hope for humanity yet.

Insurance will not cover riot damage.
 
I'm not sure who you're referring to, but no, I have never gotten drunk and as a result done something stupid, and I plan to keep it that way. That's not an acceptable defense for anything. But I would never advocate running down the crowd over a car either.

No one in particular, but I felt like certain opinions were shared by quite a few people. It's good to know that you emerged from your teen years unscathed (not that it's all over at 21 is it :D) but a lot of people can relate. And it's always a good thing to see the situation from both perspectives. That's not a defence, and surely not an excuse, never said the opposite.

My sentiments toward the car are very small. I feel really bad for the girls. And not because they are girls - because they are human beings and they are totally helpless in a situation so brutal that borders on inhuman. They might as well have been raped. The brutality of the situation is on par.

Fuck the car. What about humanity? Who treats fellow human beings like that?

Regarding your comment about the alcohol - yes, I have been drunk many times and have done stupid things, but I do them only to myself. I have never caused mayhem or hurt people around me.

Well, first - no one has been raped, so let's leave it at that.
Second - yes, it's an angry mob and what they did was off the scale of morals, but what I'm trying to say is that one is to treat others as human beings, even if one end up a victim in such a situation. You know, mob psychology is a science in itself, and human behaviour can change dramatically in a large group of people. Turns out most of the boys are regular people like you and me, and can be "good" characters in their daily life. Sure, plenty of bastards there, but still. What I am saying is that disproportionate violence (trying to escape in the car at all costs) against this crowd would be unjustified, unless there's a direct threat to one's life/health. Sure, they should have been stopped, if possible, and now after it's all over they should be brought to justice.

Well having read the posts again, maybe I took it all to seriously. It was more reasonable than I initially perceived.
 
Last edited:
In past riot footages that I've seen people tend to destroy public property, or parked cars, but I've never seen anything done when the actual owners are there and are being publicly humiliated.

I wouldn't have been touched at all if it was just a parked M5 with some hooligans destroying it. The fact that the owners were there, totally helpless, and the rioters just laughing at them and picking on them - that's what enraged me the most.
 
I have no idea what the fuck are you lot advocating (only read the first page). Floor it through the crowd? I guess you would sleep well knowing that you have killed and injured a number of people just to save your car. Better still, imagine what happens if, for whatever reason, you end up stationary. And damn, some of that would be well deserved. I mean, use your head ok, it's there for a reason. Guess you never got drunk and never did stupid things.

So cut it.

People? Those rioters aren't people anymore, they are animals, animals displaying dangerous behavior towards humans and they need to be handeld accordingly.

I have probaly had more alcohol through my systhem in my life then 20 rioting 'sportsfans' put together, I have never EVER damaged someone elses property while drunk, and most certainly have never ganged up and attacked 2 girls and their car.
Alcohol doesn't change people, it just lowers limits and brings out things you woulden't normaly do....if you act like a rioting animal while drunk, chances are you are revolting scum to begin with.

Sudgest you fucking cut it.
 
Last edited:
What I am saying is that disproportionate violence (trying to escape in the car at all costs) against this crowd would be unjustified, unless there's a direct threat to one's life/health. Sure, they should have been stopped, if possible, and now after it's all over they should be brought to justice.

I have been very busy of late, but this just cried out for a response.

This is goddamn STUPID. If you are in your vehicle, surrounded by an angry mob that begins beating on it and breaking in the windows, you should wait to find out what their intentions are??? Especially if they drag you out of the vehicle???

Let's see, where have we seen this before?


On April 29, 1992, at 5:39 PM, Denny loaded his red, 18-wheel truck with 27 tons of sand and began driving to a plant in Inglewood where he said the sand was due. He left the Santa Monica Freeway and took a familiar shortcut across Florence Avenue to get to his destination. His truck had no radio, so he was unaware he was driving into a riot. At 6:46 p.m., after entering the intersection at Normandie, rioters threw rocks at his windows and he heard people shouting for him to stop. Overhead, a news helicopter with reporter Bob Tur aboard captured the events that followed.

Denny stopped in the middle of the street. Antoine Miller opened the truck door, giving others the chance to pull Denny out. Another man, Henry Keith Watson, then held Denny's head down with his foot. Denny was kicked in the abdomen by an unidentifed man. Two other unidentified men who had led a liquor store break-in earlier that day hurled a five-pound piece of medical equipment at Denny's head and hit him three times with a claw hammer.
Damian Williams then threw a slab of concrete at Denny's head and knocked him unconscious.

Williams then did a victory dance over Denny. He then flashed gang signs at news helicopters, which were televising the events live, and pointed and laughed at Denny. Anthony Brown then spat on Denny and left with Williams. Several bystanders took pictures of Denny but did not attempt to help him. LAPD officers, despite the fact that they were in close vicinity as this took place, were unable to move in and provide help to Denny.

After the beating, various men threw beer bottles at the unconscious Denny. Gary Williams approached Denny and rifled through his pockets. Lance Parker stopped near Denny and attempted to shoot the fuel tank of Denny's truck but missed.

Bobby Green (a truck driver), Titus Murphy and Terri Barnett (boyfriend and girlfriend), and Lei Yuille (a dietitian), who had been watching the events on TV, came to Denny's aid. Denny eventually regained consciousness and dragged himself back into the cab, driving away from the scene slowly and erratically. Green, himself a truck driver, boarded Denny's truck and took over at the wheel, driving him to the hospital. At the time that Green took over, Denny was on the brink of losing consciousness again, and suffered a seizure shortly thereafter. Throughout the incident, LAPD squad cars were parked around the corner; they were however ordered to stay back from the riot in fear of officer safety.

And how did it work out for the innocent person in the mob-surrounded vehicle?

Paramedics who attended to Denny said he came very close to death. His skull was fractured in 91 places and pushed into the brain. His left eye was so badly dislocated that it would have fallen into his sinus cavity had the surgeons not replaced the crushed bone with a piece of plastic. A permanent crater remains in his head despite efforts to correct it. Denny had to undergo years of rehabilitative therapy and his speech and ability to walk were permanently damaged.

Warning: The following image of the victim, Reginald Denny, was taken some time after the attack when he'd begun to heal a bit. It is spoilered because it is still graphic and may be more than disturbing to some people. Do not look at it if you are squeamish.
reginald-denny.jpeg

Riiight. You sure you want to want to wait to find out what the mob that's assaulting your vehicle is going to do? And you want to advise others to do the same? Yeah.... okay... Words fail.

Fuck that bleeding heart kumbaya "let's all hold hands" "oh he was such a good boy/honor student/was turning his life around/was a good human being" bullcrap. Intelligent humans learned from the Reginald Denny incident.
YOU DO NOT WAIT TO FIND OUT WHAT THE MOB WANTS. Why? Because by then it's too late.

By attacking your car and threatening you, the mob has already declared they have no interest in your rights or even necessarily your continued survival, thereby forfeiting their own rights and deserving anything they catch.

As much as I hate to agree, a warning shot in the air would have solved this situation immediately.

I know you're a firearm owner, so let me ask you this - where do you think that 'warning shot' is going to come down? And do you know who is going to be downrange, or who it is going to hit?

WARNING SHOTS FIRED INTO THE AIR ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND DANGEROUS. YOU DO NOT EVER DO THIS. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY ROUND YOU FIRE. IF YOU FIRE INTO THE AIR AND IT HITS AN INNOCENT CHILD A MILE AWAY, YOU CAN AND WILL BE CHARGED WITH NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE.

This is why training and law discourages warning shots. You NEVER pull the trigger without being sure of your target and backstop!!!!! I cannot emphasize this enough - YOU DO NOT EVER FIRE WARNING SHOTS INTO THE AIR! To do so is callous and reckless disregard for human life.

That said, merely the display of a firearm is usually warning enough. If not, shooting the first three or so usually makes the rest run like hell, if you even have to get that far.

That, or she could have just started driving.

This is what current executive security driving trainers teach.

Edit: I would also note that despite the "thuggish" aspects of the sport, "uncivilized, Wild West" Dallas recently had some pretty huge celebrations for the Maverick's win of the NBA title - and we didn't have a riot. But in "civilized, peaceful, calm" Vancouver, they have city wide riots and looting. Might want to rethink those descriptors there...
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to read all of that, but I am giving a plus rep. Fuck rioters.
 
This is goddamn STUPID. If you are in your vehicle, surrounded by an angry mob that begins beating on it and breaking in the windows, you should wait to find out what their intentions are??? Especially if they drag you out of the vehicle???

That's not exactly what I said, and I bet you know it. Property destruction and murder are not the same thing, and you can give a pretty damn good estimate of what to expect of a specific mob. Then again, I was talking about this particular incident. Can you have a guess at what would have happened if the two girls attempted to escape and botched it, while injuring someone in the crowd?

And yes, we're two people with different opinions, it was apparent before :D

Edit: If they had a chance of a clear getaway, they should have grabbed it.
 
Last edited:
That's not exactly what I said, and I bet you know it.

Not exactly, but that's what your statement boils down to. You even confirm it in your next sentence.

Property destruction and murder are not the same thing, and you can give a pretty damn good estimate of what to expect of a specific mob.

The only way you can find out what a specific mob that's ATTACKING YOUR CAR AND TRYING TO DRAG YOU OUT OF IT has in mind is to wait for them to show you.

Then again, I was talking about this particular incident. Can you have a guess at what would have happened if the two girls attempted to escape and botched it, while injuring someone in the crowd?

How would you botch that? Steer for the open space, floor the gas. People WILL get out of the way one way or the other. The M5 is a lot of car to break out of a mob encirclement with.

And I was also speaking of this specific incident.

Edit: If they had a chance of a clear getaway, they should have grabbed it.

Apparently they didn't or they didn't think they did. Just like Reginald Denny.

But if you like, here's some additional examples.
http://www.nujournal.com/page/content.detail/id/50104.html?isap=1&nav=5031&showlayout=0
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Narrow-escape-for-CJ-as-mob-attacks-car/Article1-139423.aspx
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=753_1258400370 <-- NSFW due to footage of 'sports mob' dragging and sexually assaulting female drivers from cars

Do you want your mom or sister or girlfriend to be beaten, raped or killed by a mob because they waited to determine the mob's intentions, to see if they were interested in only property destruction or on murderous assault (which, by the way, mobs can escalate to astonishingly fast) - or would you prefer they take the violent assault on the clearly occupied car as an earnest of their intentions and take whatever steps necessary to preserve themselves? I know which I would want them to do - and so do most jurors.
 
Last edited:
Do you want your mom or sister or girlfriend to be beaten, raped or killed by a mob ...

I see reason in your opinion and I see reason in mine. I can't even tell for sure what would I do in a similar situation. If I'm with my girlfriend / mother, I would do anything to protect them, but if I'm alone or in a company of level-headed friends, I would probably just step aside. It's like being robbed in the street. If you feel like a hero, you can have a go, but most people just give away their belongings, although it's mostly fear, not reasonable thinking. Fear which is to protect us from stupid actions.
 
It's like being robbed in the street. If you feel like a hero, you can have a go, but most people just give away their belongings, although it's mostly fear, not reasonable thinking. Fear which is to protect us from stupid actions.


Sadly, more and more criminals have learned that "dead men tell no tales." It's getting the point where it's more likely that the criminal will shoot or stab you after robbing you as opposed to letting you go. Some cases in point:
http://www.greenvilleonline.com/art...024/Man-killed-in-robbery-outside-pizza-place
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-man...ed-by-friends-family-20110517,0,4139994.story
http://blogs.golf.com/presstent/2011/01/south-florida-man-killed-in-golf-course-robbery.html

And just so you don't think it's a US-only phenomenon:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/apr/07/blackberry-london-murder-trial
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x74y58_man-killed-in-pontypool-robbery_news
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/26901-life-for-robbers-who-killed-lawyer

And, of course, we could escalate into terrorism, where the 9/11 hijackers told the people on the airliners (in classic criminal style) that if they cooperated and didn't resist they wouldn't be hurt. There's another 2977 and counting good reasons not to comply and to resist whenever threatened.

You cannot trust a criminal's promises, particularly when they are in the act of using force against you. This mob in Vancouver was by definition criminals using force - the second they started attacking the car and attempting to drag out the occupants.

I see no logic, no reason in your position; I only see feel-good bullshit that gets innocent people killed - and I'm not talking about the mob members, either. They stopped being innocent the second someone threw the first projectile, the second someone's fist or boot contacted the bodywork.
 
Last edited:
You know, Spectre, life is quite good. But it reluctantly gives you what you look for. Imagine it a violent thing with no mercy, and it will not disappoint.
 
You know, Spectre, life is quite good. But it reluctantly gives you what you look for. Imagine it a violent thing with no mercy, and it will not disappoint.

Si vis pacem, para bellum. And you will usually not be disappointed either way.

In case you hadn't noticed, the world, indeed the entire universe that we know of IS a violent place with little mercy. See nature for details. Human history, too - or have you not paid attention to what's going on in Syria and the like? That is more often the common condition of mankind than 'peace'.

High morals and pacifism of the type you espouse have little basis in logic or reality and only work when your opponent is of similar mind or has an overwhelmingly countervailing incentive to avoid crushing you. Too bad the supermajority of people aren't and will never be; I sincerely doubt you would be able to hold a learned discussion comparing and contrasting Martin Luther King's nonviolence with Ghandi's among the members of the Vancouver (or indeed almost any angry) mob.
 
Last edited:
Spectre, you are commiting what in my line of work we call a naturalistic fallacy here: You deduct the nature of mankind from the current state of things, coming to the conclusion that things have to be this way.

Society is what we make of it. Civil war in Syria, riots in L.A. or elsewhere do not change the fact that most people and most societies are decent and if you trust not to be attacked when you go out at night, you won't be disappointed in the overwhelming majority of cases.
 
Spectre, you are commiting what in my line of work we call a naturalistic fallacy here: You deduct the nature of mankind from the current state of things, coming to the conclusion that things have to be this way.

So, deducing the nature of mankind from 4000 years of history is a fallacy now? Interesting.

As a subset of that, I commend this list to your attention. Even if you limit it to just post-1600, the 'normal' condition of Europe appears to be war and violence. Is this also somehow untrue, based on the historical record?

Society is what we make of it. Civil war in Syria, riots in L.A. or elsewhere do not change the fact that most people and most societies are decent and if you trust not to be attacked when you go out at night, you won't be disappointed in the overwhelming majority of cases.

This, while true, has zero bearing whatsoever on 'what to do if surrounded by an angry mob that is attacking your car and trying to drag you out of it.' Intelligent people generally prefer not to chance getting raped, killed, or worse, and the historical record supports the idea that perhaps you don't want to wait around to find out exactly what the mob intends.
 
Last edited:
Edit: I would also note that despite the "thuggish" aspects of the sport, "uncivilized, Wild West" Dallas recently had some pretty huge celebrations for the Maverick's win of the NBA title - and we didn't have a riot. But in "civilized, peaceful, calm" Vancouver, they have city wide riots and looting.
We also don't have riots regarding the results of any championship match and that's why I don't subscribe to any sort of excuse for these morons.

I was eating dinner before I read the OP and now I feel sick. Fucking disgusting behavior. As for the people attacking the M5: :censored::censored::censored:

 
Spectre, I like the light you bring to the subject (your thoughts are rare where I live and you have a lot of points), but I think Dr_Grip is right here. You can't deduct a single human nature valid for everyone from any of those mobs, anymore than you can deduct a single human nature from history, because human nature is not a singularity nor men behave all in the same way.

What you can surely do is understand what can happen in certain situations, but it's very risky to tell what will happen tomorrow by just a bunch of examples of what happened yesterday, because you lack the reasons behind it (which are mostly individual even in the case of mobs). For example, what will a man holding up a convenience store do after the clerk will have given him all the money? Will he go away? will he coldly shoot the clerk a single bullet in the head, will he discharge 10-plus bullets around from a distance of 1 meter without hitting the clerk in any way (out of incompetence with firearms, not luck)? Will he beat the clerk with the handle of the gun? The fact is you don't know. You could know if you knew the criminal well enough, if you knew what is going on in his mind; but if you are the clerk, there is no way you can find all the useful information out before being needed to decide how to behave in front of a gun. What will you do? You could react, but if you are not sure to succeed, then your reaction could make the difference between being shot or not, and it's a big, big difference. How much sure are you of succeeding?

The same goes for mobs. Being part of the mob is like getting back to when we were early-teens and we followed our little tribe of friends around and do things we wouldn't do otherwise, from entering no-trespassing areas to getting porn magazines. If what the mob does is not too much against your inner rules, or if your mind is too weak, you can really accept everything the mob will do.

As you said, you never know how mobs will react, but being aggressive is exactly the right way to set the entire group of people against you at the same level of violence you are using, or more. If they are after your car, chances are you will get away unharmed, but if you act violently, you are setting the mob after you instead of the car. Then, the question is: how reasonably can you get away from the mob using violence? If you floor the M5 (which is something I would surely consider), and the crowd simply isn't thin enough, what will happen to you when the sheer weight of the people you run over will stop your flight?

Most people won't react because you actually have more chances of survival by acting passively. If you know how to react and react correctly, then you have better chances still, but if you fail, it would have been better to remain passive. The assessment on what is the best behaviour in any given episode is quite difficult to make.
 
Last edited:
So, deducing the nature of mankind from 4000 years of history is a fallacy now? Interesting.

People shat in buckets and dumped their feces in the streets for the better part of this 4000-year history. They also held slaves, opressed women and upheld monarchy. In some part of the world, they still do. And for all this things there were people arguing that it has to be this way, just like you.

So yes, it is a fallacy.
 
I don't think you would necessarily need to floor it. Lock the doors, lean on the horn, rev the engine and make your intentions abundantly clear. Then engage drive and move off slowly to give people the chance to get out of the way. If they don't then move more purposefully, brake and repeat.

And if not then floor it.
 
I don't think you would necessarily need to floor it. Lock the doors, lean on the horn, rev the engine and make your intentions abundantly clear. Then engage drive and move off slowly to give people the chance to get out of the way. If they don't then move more purposefully, brake and repeat.

And if not then floor it.
Yeah unless you are driving an extra pointy classic car you could probably knock people out of the way without injuring them if you go at a snail crawl. I would try that before mowing people down.
 
I don't know, but I have the feeling that if you tried that surrounded by an aggressive mob, you'd have your windows smashed pretty quickly.
 
Top