Well, technically only one of them was a porn star, the other was a Playboy model. But yes, I don't see anything factually wrong in the post.I seen one definite error in @Blind_Io's post. Trump paid off two pornstars.
Wait, NOW you're bothered by lying?!That doesn't bother me, that's between Donald, Melania, and Stormy. I couldn't care less if someone sleeps with some ho, just like it doesn't bother me that Slick Willy stuck his cigar in places where cigars don't belong (the perjury, however, is an issue).
That doesn't bother me, that's between Donald, Melania, and Stormy. I couldn't care less if someone sleeps with some ho, just like it doesn't bother me that Slick Willy stuck his cigar in places where cigars don't belong (the perjury, however, is an issue).
Does it though? Seems that narrative died out pretty quickly to make way for “collusion”, “obstruction”, which also seems to have mostly gone away...It is not who he is sleeping with that is the issue. The issue is the payoff the violates campaign finance laws, which he also lied about.
Does it though? Seems that narrative died out pretty quickly to make way for “collusion”, “obstruction”, which also seems to have mostly gone away...
As I noted upthread, while Mueller didn't have the power to indict, he did have the power to recommend impeachment/indictment, which he didn't...the Office of Legal Counsel has advised that it's their opinion that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime. Mueller will restate this when he appears before Congress on the 17th of this month.
You are basing that on the fact that he made a joke? I'm guilty of a lot of shit in that case....For an "innocent" man, he sure looks guilty.
Either he is a failure of a president who can't get anything done, or a tyrannical despot - it can't be both.falling into the hands of a tyrannical despot
Either he is a failure of a president who can't get anything done, or a tyrannical despot - it can't be both.
Isn’t the measure of a tyrannical despot ruling with an iron fist? If Trump can’t get any of his promises done (as per you and Blind) then he by definition is not a despot.The two are not mutually exclusive, i would say the fact he is failing at both show just how inept he is.
Well that’s not very nice...Both you and Lev aren't interested in informed debate, so I won't be responding to either of you after this. The gaslighting and trolling in this thread and others is a little ridiculous.
Isn’t the measure of a tyrannical despot ruling with an iron fist? If Trump can’t get any of his promises done (as per you and Blind) then he by definition is not a despot.
So everything is working as designed then and he is not a tyrant (whether he wants to be is largely irrelevant for this discussion)It is not for a lack of trying. It is only due to the checks and balances of our government, and his own people resisting his orders that have kept him from doing as he pleases.
I want 90% of NYC vehicles to disappear, but there isn’t a way I could do it, does it matter that I want this?No, it is not irrelevant.