Jeremy Clarkson on the Lexus IS250

SL65

Ambitious but rubbish!
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
9,325
Location
Sydney, Australia
Car(s)
1998 Subaru Legacy 2.5L
Jeremy Clarkson on the Lexus IS250 SE
0,,293759,00.jpg


Quite often, pink magazines full of advertisements for garden furniture and Jilly Cooper curtains call my wife to see if she?d like to become their motoring correspondent. ?We?d like you to write about cars from a female point of view,? they always say.

Right. I see. And what exactly is a woman?s point of view when it comes to cars. The colour? Whether you break your nails on the door handles? How much space there is in the boot for babies? Puh-lease. My wife?s argument on this point is sound. Women who are interested in cars are excited by exactly the same things that excite men. Power. Looks. Handling. And women who aren?t interested in cars won?t read about them, no matter what shaped genitals the author has.

So she sends off 1,000 words about a Caterham Cosworth, saying that it ripped her eyeballs out, set her hair on fire and left her with the same sort of ruddy glow she gets from a really good Terminator movie. This, as a general rule, is placed fairly quickly on the editor?s spike.

If we look back over the years, my wife, a mother of three, has run a Caterham that she misses dearly, a Lotus Elise 111S that she sent back for sports exhausts because it wasn?t loud enough, a BMW Z1 and a motorbike of some kind. Currently she appears to have an Aston Martin V8 Vantage.

Ask her about space in the back for kids or whether these things have convenient handles on which she can hang a handbag and she?ll shove a hot conrod up your jacksie. She?s not bothered. And it?s an especially good idea to steer clear of fuel consumption, because if you bring this up she?ll siphon a gallon from the tank and use it to burn you alive.

This is why I always give sexism a wide berth when writing about cars. Any suggestion that one model is better suited to men, or women, and I have to spend the rest of the day disentangling myself from the ironing board. Or begging to be let out of the Aga.

This is no great hardship because of all the ?ists? you can call me, ?sex-ist? isn?t one of them. I don?t run for the exits when a pilot comes on the PA system to say her name?s Sandra, and when a lady doctor is examining my arthritic hips I?ve never once been tempted to say, ?Oh, and while you?re down there . . .?

However, I am bringing some stereotypes to the table this morning because I have a question about the Lexus IS 250 SE. Have you ever seen one being driven by a woman? In fact have you ever seen any Lexus being driven by a woman? Apart from that girl in Terminator 3 who nicked a 430 convertible ? and she was technically a robot ? I haven?t. I?ve seen girls in Evo 8s and Ferraris and Astons. Once I even saw a girl in a Lamborghini LM002, which caused a faint but distinct stirring. But never in a Lexulator.

I?m sure that Toyota?s marketing department will be reaching for the e-mail button right now to send me figures that show x per cent of Lexees are bought by women, but I bet that if these ?female? customers were examined more carefully, every single one would have an Adam?s apple.

It?s hard at first to see what makes the Lexus brand as uniquely male as a Leatherman or a hunter-killer submarine. The IS a pretty car and we know from every single survey ever undertaken that no other vehicle on the planet is quite so well made.

Of course there are some things wrong with it. Space in the back is limited, the seats aren?t overly supportive, the steering is way too sharp and the door mirrors are the size of barn doors. But since when did a woman ever complain about a mirror being too large? Perhaps, then, it?s the rev counter that glows orange as you approach the red line. ?Noooooo? wailed my wife after she came back from the school run. ?I loved that. I made it orange the whole way home.?

What then? What feature does this car have that makes it so unappealing for women? My wife couldn?t help. ?I just don?t like it,? she said.

I did. Oh sure, it?s not the fastest car in the world. In fact it has about as much power as my second serve. But this is not such a bad thing because of that super-sharp steering.

If by some miracle you?re going too fast when you turn the wheel, you had better be awake, because everything can get awfully skittish, awfully quickly.

Also, the touch screen sat nav system was preposterously complicated. But you can solve this, if you?re a woman, by reading the instruction book.

Me? I was too busy revelling in the quietness of the engine, the complete absence of wind roar, even around the six-acre door mirrors, and the well-chosen ride.

It?s never too harsh that it shatters your bones on every speed bump and it?s never so soft that it flops into the hedgerow on every bend. I also loved the sense that every button and every switch will outlive the sun.

Then there?s the stereo, which has (a lot) more power than the engine, and the price. Take into account the list of standard goodies and this car costs not hundreds but thousands of pounds less than a BMW 3-series. It?s better looking than a 3-series too. In fact it?s better looking than a Mercedes C-class, an Audi A4 and a Jaguar X-type. Obviously, in this sector of the market, I?d take the Alfa Romeo 159 because that has a soul that the Lexus is missing. But if you don?t want to be plagued with breakdowns, the IS 250 does appear to be a good bet.

And that brings me back to the original question. Why do you never see one being driven by a woman? To find an answer we need to get logical. Nobody who?s interested in cars, whether they?re a man or a woman, will buy a Lexus. They?re just not zingy enough.

So they are only for people who are not interested in cars, people who simply want four reliable wheels and a seat. And this is where things split. Men are happy to go down the Lexus route whereas women are not.

To see if I could find out why, I did something unusual. I picked up the phone and rang a few girls who don?t know one end of a dipstick from their left cheque book. And all, curiously, said pretty much the same thing. ?A Lexus? Eugh.? ?They?re perfectly revolting.? ?They?re for people who play golf.? And best of all: ?They?re all driven by the sort of person I wouldn?t want to know.?

There?s an inescapable conclusion here. Buy a Lexus and you are demonstrating two things. First that you are a man, and second that you are not interested in a car?s power or handling. This, it seems, is not something women find attractive.

Think about this, before you say no to that Alfa.
That was a really a really good article by Jezza standards. The thing that interests me is has he signed the cheque for a Aston Martin V8 Vantage? If he has, I hate him.

As for the review itself - Well it wasn't very good in that he didn't reward the Lexus IS for being a good car - But I understand that this is his style of reviewing cars as he looks for the "heart & soul" in a car which the Alfa 159 certainly has.

His comments regarding sharp steering, unsupportive seats & huge door mirrors are perfectly correct. I have said those exact same things about both the current model and previous model IS which I have driven.

But all in all...great review and it'll be interesting to see if he's actually got the Aston? I'm sure what with him loving those cars...they would have set him up with a good deal...
 
Excellent article. Sounds like his wife is more of a car nut than he is!

AMV8. Bastardo.
 
Well, at times his wife seems to be a way bigger petrolhead than he is, abd obviously he doesn't have that much say at home... If she wants one, she'll get it. And if your husbands name is Jeremy Clarkson, I doubt she'll be on the waiting list for very long...
 
:lol:

I couldn't agree more with Jezza on the IS. My friend has the 300hp IS350 and that thing is BORING. Sure, it's supposed to go from 0-60mph in less than 6 seconds. But it doesn't feel like it. It doesn't even feel like a car. It's just something with four wheels and four doors--like Jezza said.

I always say Lexus is for people who don't like to drive.
 
Really odd, considering the only people I ever see driving that Lexus roadster are women. Eh, then again this is Florida, not the UK. Maybe women in the UK have more sense about cars than the ones here in FL...

Though I did like Jezza's wife's comment about "keeping it orange the whole way home." :lol:
 
I sort of agree with YF19 about the SC, I certainly see women driving them. But it does seem to be an even split between women and men. And i've only ever seen men drive Lexus saloons, I'm positively certain of that.

Love the end of that article. Makes so much sense backed up by verification.
 
Great article by Jeremy, especially considering he didn't spend the first page and a half talking about British politics and leaving one paragraph at the end about how crappy the car is.

Funny enough, most Lexuses I've seen are either driven by women, old men, or old women. Must be way different there in Ol' Blighty...
 
BlaRo said:
Great article by Jeremy, especially considering he didn't spend the first page and a half talking about British politics and leaving one paragraph at the end about how crappy the car is.

Funny enough, most Lexuses I've seen are either driven by women, old men, or old women. Must be way different there in Ol' Blighty...

Lexuses in the UK suffer from the Alan Partridge image problem.

[wiki him if you don't know who he is]

The upshot is, that's the car he desired, and indeed bought in the end, and as such Lexuses have been tainted with that brush ever since.
 
Spot on about the seats; seems to me most Toyotas are like that.
 
I completely with Jeremy, very well designed and well built car, it has a few faults, and I'd have the SAAB 9-3 for that money. :p

Lexus' are for non car people, you get legendary Toyota reliabilty and it's acutally a nice place to be. However, they're just like my mom's camry in that they drive fine, but you want to get where you're going as quickly as possible so you don't have to drive it anymore. :sleeping: When I arrive some where in my saab though I'm cross that I don't have to drive anymore. :x

And has anyone else noticed that not only do they not offer the IS350 in Britian, but they also have no mention of the AWD option they give to the US. Same on the BMW site, no mention of the AWD we're offered in the US. :huh:
 
Great article. Makes me think of my Accounting professor that drives a Lexus... an NO ONE liked him at all.

BTW, anyone read Jeremy's article from this months TG mag? It's fantastic! and he mentions the Star Wars Kid. :lol:
 
Well I think IS could be a pretty good car for someone who has to drive long distances every day. But if you were to drive aggressively you are better of with a BMW 3-series. I'm not defending Lexus or anything but I have nothing against it either. I'm really interested in cars but I couldn't care less about the image of my car or what other people think of it. So on that basis I can buy a car using my own brains.

EDIT: I haven't driven the IS yet.
 
Perhaps, then, it’s the rev counter that glows orange as you approach the red line. “Noooooo” wailed my wife after she came back from the school run. “I loved that. I made it orange the whole way home.”
i love his wife :p

i cant belive he bashd the power.. it might be the top range model in the UK .. but he might just have mentiond the IS350 .. that outruns a M3 on the straights :p

and i know 3 woman that drives Lexusees.. usses.. esses.. bah! (2 IS, 1 GS)
 
Raven18940 said:
I completely with Jeremy, very well designed and well built car, it has a few faults, and I'd have the SAAB 9-3 for that money. :p

Lexus' are for non car people, you get legendary Toyota reliabilty and it's acutally a nice place to be. However, they're just like my mom's camry in that they drive fine, but you want to get where you're going as quickly as possible so you don't have to drive it anymore. :sleeping: When I arrive some where in my saab though I'm cross that I don't have to drive anymore. :x

And has anyone else noticed that not only do they not offer the IS350 in Britian, but they also have no mention of the AWD option they give to the US. Same on the BMW site, no mention of the AWD we're offered in the US. :huh:

The AWD options are often times only sold in areas that get heavy snows, like PA. It would probably be close to impossible for me to get ahold of one here in Florida.


"Yes, I'd like an AWD Lexus IS350, please."
"Sorry, but they don't make them in AWD."
"But my friend in PA has one."
"Then he must have done it himself, which means he's voided the waranty."
"No, no, he bought it new from a Lexus dealer."
"No he didn't. Lexus doesn't make AWD IS cars. Sorry."



Edit: Just hit the Lexus site, they have the IS250 AWD listed...
 
Kebab gud said:
the IS350 dosent come with AWD .. only the IS250 so he was right youknow :p
Yeah, that baffles me too, I don't need AWD for 200 hp, but I'd definately consider it for 300 hp. Damn toyota doing things backward. :roll:
 
I'm going to order an IS250 next month... but it's not stayin stock in any way, shape or form for too long. :p We've been toying with a buddy's IS250 figuring out the engine management... First go on the car will be this and suspension tweaks. Then a turbo set up with a standalone. There's quite a bit of tweaking with the old IS300, SC300 (MkIII 1J Supra motor) and even some GS400s (MkIV 2J Supra motor swap) in Southern California. It's not common, but definitely out there. I suppose anything could be considered "dull" in stock trim... friends don't let friends drive stock :)

iskit1.jpg


iskit2.jpg
 
Top