- Joined
- Sep 21, 2003
- Messages
- 31,044
- Location
- Portland, Oregon
- Car(s)
- 2008 Dodge Viper, 2006 MB CLS55 AMG
Agreed. It's not a car for everyone, and culture has a big part of it.
kekekeke said:Fun fact. The NSX-R is faster around the ring than the current viper srt10. Interesting no?
More expensive, Tuned by ArytonSenna, Made TO race, not at all interestingjetsetter said:kekekeke said:Fun fact. The NSX-R is faster around the ring than the current viper srt10. Interesting no?
No, not really.
kekekeke said:More expensive? The price is similar. Made TO race? I'm sorry, but so is the SRT10. And considering it's age and the disadvantage in power, it is VERY interesting.
Well, an iron-block engine with gigantic turbos isn't exactly a featherweight now is it? (though I'm more talking about the modded RB engines than the SRs, but according to you they top out where cars like the viper start off, so...) Also, if you're going to compare heavily modified cars to stock ones, you have to at least admit that modified cars are never very reliable, and anything that's pushing 1000+hp is going to need a VERY large turbo which is not going to have instant response. AND I'm not talking about factory-prepped racing cars that only have to run for one season, I'm talking about production cars that will be driven on normal roads every day, year after year in a variety of different conditions, all using the same setup, like the McLaren-tuned Viper that this thread is supposedly about.ishigakisensei said:chaos386 said:Yes, all those wonderfully heavy and unreliable engines with laggy turbos.
Spoken by a person without a clue and who has been wounded desperately seeking something snide to come back with. RB26DETT+HICAS=Godzilla (the banned in Australia Tourning Car).
You mistake my noticing the superiority of the Japanese as preferring it to be that way. I root for the home team, but....
chaos386 said:Well, an iron-block engine with gigantic turbos isn't exactly a featherweight now is it? (though I'm more talking about the modded RB engines than the SRs, but according to you they top out where cars like the viper start off, so...) Also, if you're going to compare heavily modified cars to stock ones, you have to at least admit that modified cars are never very reliable, and anything that's pushing 1000+hp is going to need a VERY large turbo which is not going to have instant response. AND I'm not talking about factory-prepped racing cars that only have to run for one season, I'm talking about production cars that will be driven on normal roads every day, year after year in a variety of different conditions, all using the same setup, like the McLaren-tuned Viper that this thread is supposedly about.ishigakisensei said:chaos386 said:Yes, all those wonderfully heavy and unreliable engines with laggy turbos.
Spoken by a person without a clue and who has been wounded desperately seeking something snide to come back with. RB26DETT+HICAS=Godzilla (the banned in Australia Tourning Car).
You mistake my noticing the superiority of the Japanese as preferring it to be that way. I root for the home team, but....
Look, I can tell that you feel very passionate about the GTR, Nissans, and Japanese cars in general, and I apologise for being harsh in my comments, but you just struck a nerve in me when you said that your opinions were not only that but were a "higher standard", implying that the opinions of others were inferior. I just don't like that kind of attitude. People buy cars for very different reasons, so to say that yours are the way, the truth, and the light, and that all others are of a lower standard is very narrow-minded.
chaos386 said:Well, an iron-block engine with gigantic turbos isn't exactly a featherweight now is it? (though I'm more talking about the modded RB engines than the SRs, but according to you they top out where cars like the viper start off, so...) Also, if you're going to compare heavily modified cars to stock ones, you have to at least admit that modified cars are never very reliable, and anything that's pushing 1000+hp is going to need a VERY large turbo which is not going to have instant response. AND I'm not talking about factory-prepped racing cars that only have to run for one season, I'm talking about production cars that will be driven on normal roads every day, year after year in a variety of different conditions, all using the same setup, like the McLaren-tuned Viper that this thread is supposedly about.ishigakisensei said:chaos386 said:Yes, all those wonderfully heavy and unreliable engines with laggy turbos.
Spoken by a person without a clue and who has been wounded desperately seeking something snide to come back with. RB26DETT+HICAS=Godzilla (the banned in Australia Tourning Car).
You mistake my noticing the superiority of the Japanese as preferring it to be that way. I root for the home team, but....
Look, I can tell that you feel very passionate about the GTR, Nissans, and Japanese cars in general, and I apologise for being harsh in my comments, but you just struck a nerve in me when you said that your opinions were not only that but were a "higher standard", implying that the opinions of others were inferior. I just don't like that kind of attitude. People buy cars for very different reasons, so to say that yours are the way, the truth, and the light, and that all others are of a lower standard is very narrow-minded.
Four turbos on an 8-litre 16-cylinder engine for the win!youngwarrior said:And then there was the veyron.
martineb72 said:Not to defend the other guy because I don't like him,
Un-Dee said:Saw a Viper vs M6 comparison on Motorvision today. They both cost the same in Germany, and the 0-62 times were nowhere near Dodge's claims. It took the Viper 4.8secs, they claim 0-60 is "under 4" and the BMW M6 4.4secs.
The Viper is a nice, manly, brutal car, but i feel somehow it could be a lot better.
the M6 is probably much easier to get a good launch compared to the Viper, even with aids turned off. On Fifth Gear they were testing the Viper against the C6, and Tiff and Plato were having trouble getting a really good launch in the viper because of its massive torque.jetsetter said:Un-Dee said:Saw a Viper vs M6 comparison on Motorvision today. They both cost the same in Germany, and the 0-62 times were nowhere near Dodge's claims. It took the Viper 4.8secs, they claim 0-60 is "under 4" and the BMW M6 4.4secs.
The Viper is a nice, manly, brutal car, but i feel somehow it could be a lot better.
It depends on testing conditions, driver skill, etc. Remeber that M6 has many driver aids.