sandor_
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2005
- Messages
- 1,043
- Location
- Philadelphia, USA
- Car(s)
- '76 911, '97 328i, '73 R75/5, '71 Vespa
The reason for that is outfitting a high rise or high density housing with fiber costs Verizon A LOT more than running trunk lines down suburban streets. Burying cable is cheaper than getting fiber pulled through an entire building. (They have to pull ethernet to each housing unit from the phone box location, adding to the cost). The suburbs also tend to have more higher spending people (More people willing to subscribe to HBO, Cinemax, etc...), because even though those people exist in cities, they tend to spend their money in the city (seeing movies in theaters, etc...) as opposed to watching them at home.
..but if you think about the commercial possibilities alone... a 60 story building, already run with cat 5e (as most are) and businesses that would look at the 30 mbps/15mbps $200/month package as cheap, it would seem like a gold mine.
granted, i agree that older high rise residential buildings could be a real pain, but outside of the high-rises, a typical square mile of city rowhomes has many more households than a square mile in the 'burbs, and really, Verzon's pricing for FIOS was about $5 a month cheaper than what i am paying them for DSL now, and about $15 a month cheaper than Comcrap.
I'm really only bitching about this as a personal point, having had FIOS, and then lost it when i moved I've heard arguements about Verizon needing to dig up streets to rin fiber in the city, but in Philly this is completely false, as the majority of utilities are run in easily accessible tunnels underground - gas and water are the only things they need to tear up the streets for.
...anyway, i'll stop crying...