You may reject global warming but the idea of dismissing any responsibility for the well being of nature we as humans have makes me sick. I have no fancy study to pull out, but emitting those amounts of gasses and creating vast amounts of toxins can't be healthy and we will pay the price for it.
Seriously, reading those "Screw nature, I do whatever I want, what now bitch?" post make me cringe.
You may be interpreting it differently than I have intended. See, because of technology and industry, we as human beings live far better, longer, wealthier and happier in the past 200 years than from the previous XX,XXX years proceeding the rise of industry. Would you believe that I am, in a sense, a conservationist? Would you also believe, after reading that, I am strongly
against environmentalism?
In my viewpoint, environmentalism is a political movement, rather than a logical one. The enviromentals want to have industry shut down, all infrastructure destroyed, and have our planet returned to how it was 1,000,000 years ago. They are terribly racked with guilt, and vocally express as much. And their champion to have these deeds done? Their government.
Take a look at the Kyoto treaty...which gigantic, industrial nation has been left out? China, of course. And they spew as much toxic whatever into the atmosphere as we do, probably even more. But, they are considered an "emerging nation", and as such, are exempt from laws that are slowly taking your freedoms, and mine! So again we have a raging contradiction of terms.
I would like to pose a question to username Drift_Session. You seem to convey that you agree with Albert Gores viewpoints. Ok, now I would like you to consider a situation:
May I be so bold as to say that you enjoy drifting? You know, that is ALOT of carbon emissions from those smoking tires and wailing engines. What would you say if (and again, I am assuming that you are a United States resident) that our government passed a law saying it now illegal to have motorsport competitions because of the emissions that are generated. What if our government started to expand so much, that they pass a law stating rear wheel drive vehicles are hearby illegal because they can sustain long burnouts? Let us get really ridiculous: what if government became so large and unchecked, that they hearby pass a law saying that the only vehicle that can be produced is front wheel drive and under 100 horsepower?
What...you DONT think that can happen? Want to buy the Brooklyn Bridge real cheap? Big Governments exist because they fear the population, because the ones who believe in big government have no faith in the power of the individual. Time and again, this has been proved wrong.
But hey, the government is doing what they think is best for the populace, right? Does that remind you of some other governments from the past 20th century? Like ....oh, I dunno, Russia? Nazi Germany? China?