Calling them out is really weird, like you want them to flaggelate in front of you or something. It's not the first time you do it either.
One of them in particular did it when people would counter his arguments against Obama.
I'd be happy if they admit they were wrong, otherwise their support for Trump lingers as tacit support for his current actions. The other option is they can double down yet again and state they support these actions when they are used against political opponents.Calling them out is really weird, like you want them to flaggelate in front of you or something. It's not the first time you do it either.
No, sorry, but No. I'm not playing this game of double standards again. I'm not taking the high road this time, LeVeL tried this too and it's a play he learned from Trump: set the rules so you can play dirty, then play the victim when the other side does the same; poke and antagonize the other until they call you out and then flop a sympathy card or try to make it look like hypocrisy with crocodile tears and cries of "so much for the tolerant Left." This time I'm going to do the full hour-long "I fucking told you so" interpretive dance and beat poetry number. Trump's bootlickers don't get to slink away into the night and not have someone point out that they were complicit in this unmitigated disaster, they voted for and supported this idiocy, and they did nothing when Trump's spineless stooges in the Senate condoned his actions and emboldened him because they saw a chance to line their pockets for a little bit longer. Supporting the person attacking our elections from within and undermining our very system of governance and way of life is the same as doing it yourself - and I will not sit down and shut up as the place falls down around our ears just to spare someone the embarrassment of being called a fucking idiot.And it was just as annoying back then. Or is that you should only do it when you are right?
It is richly deserved. Just remember all the crap that non-Trumpettes had to put up with earlier.Calling them out is really weird, like you want them to flaggelate in front of you or something. It's not the first time you do it either.
And it was just as annoying back then. Or is that you should only do it when you are right?
And it was just as annoying back then. Or is that you should only do it when you are right?
I am aware, concerning and very similar at how political dissidents were disappeared around this part of the world in the 80s. Except these ones do not turn up as skulls 20 years after the fact...yet. Your point?
Sure it does, areas that are more likely to have undocumented immigrants will be under represented.
Not to continue sounding like a traitor to my compatriots, but am I to understand that you want people who are in your country illegally as active members of policy and decision making?
They are not allowed to vote or run for office. The Constitution mandates a count every 10 years, and the Fourteenth Amendment states:
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.
So, I want the law of the land to be followed. That means people get counted.
This is the bit I was concerned about. Thank you for clarifying.
How do you enforce the ban on voting without an ID system? I imagined drivers licenses, but some states are handing those out to illegal immigrants as well. Does it vary by state?