Bullshit. I've never had anyone on an import cruiser shout at me for riding the "wrong" bike or be a dick and have a club prospect "clear the road" so they could ride out of a parking lot after boozing for the last hour.
Bullshit. I've never had anyone on an import cruiser shout at me for riding the "wrong" bike
As for me, I am bent and determined that my next bike will be something like a VFR1200 or a Hayabusa. I think I'd rather the VFR1200, as I don't really care about the "driveline lash" that everyone talks about with a shaft. Less maintenance is something to look for with all vehicles.
I recently went to a motorcycle show and the VFR1200 was the one that impressed me the most. Great riding position, very well-equipped and pretty good build quality.
I must be getting old.
Because he (or more likely she) was on the wrong bike to begin with.
You sound angry at people who ride Harleys... for getting angry with people who pretend to ride Harleys.
Because he (or more likely she) was on the wrong bike to begin with.
You sound angry at people who ride Harleys... for getting angry with people who pretend to ride Harleys.
I forget where I saw that info, but that would make the potato-potato noise more accessible to some nicer folks who might actually wave back. Whether or not any nice people would actually buy one has yet to be determined.
If wanting something that is comfortable, well made and well equipped makes me old, then I'll take that AARP card now.
Ducati also sells a lifestyle, but they have the bikes to back it up and are more reliable, require less maintenance, are more efficient than Harley. As a bonus, Ducati actually wins races, Harley can hardly win a race series with double the displacement and they still needed to bring in Buell to build a decent chassis.
Well, I was really surprised this season - all round, I have seen more Harleys stuck on the side of the road than any other maker. Not sure whether it was the owner's fault on not maintaining it through the winter season or just the bike in general. It doesn't mean I won't stop and give them a push (like I did a few weeks ago) though ... just kinda' sad at the reliability.
I'm just saying, it's two separate issues, both the handling and the engine.The wobble isn't engine related and direct fuel injection doesn't have anything to do with handling.
Check your steering stem bearings and the frame under the step-through.
On the jap side there is really no cruiser that appeals to me (except a custom 1400 intruder, that shaft drive somehow looks sweet ), then again neither do the bigger Harleys.
What if they want a Harley Davidson, because it appeals to them for no reason other than itself?
I took a testride on one and ... the smile that I had on my mouth was bigger then it has ever been on my Fazer.
I'm not pissed at Harley riders, I'm pissed at some Harley riders.
Blind_Io said:Harley is for posers, not riders.
Ducati also sells a lifestyle, but they have the bikes to back it up and are more reliable, require less maintenance, are more efficient than Harley.
As a bonus, Ducati actually wins races, Harley can hardly win a race series with double the displacement and they still needed to bring in Buell to build a decent chassis.
Besides, most people hate squids but they don't lump all sports bike riders into the same category of morons. Next time someone looks at you sideways when you tell them you ride a bike remember...
Show me one rider who thinks this way categorically. My opinion about Harley is as a rider about a motorcycle and the people who tend to buy them. As in your previous point, what you have posted is the opinion of someone who knows dick about riding or motorcycles. One is the opinion of a person who is knowledgeable about the subject and has personal experience, the other opinion comes out of ignorance....just like (sports) bikes are for brainless arseholes with a deathwish and no regard for other road users (or something like that).
But it's a flawed analogy. Rolex is the height of mechanical craftsmanship using only the highest quality materials and unmatched quality control. The movement of your imitation isn't even the same technology, it would be like comparing a handbuilt steam engine to a Honda Fit. Harley doesn't have the reliability of a Rolex (my dad's old Rolex was worn for over 20 years and keeps perfect time), it doesn't have the finish, the design or the craftsmanship. Harley is not the pinnacle example of motorcycle technology, it's just outdated. If Harley was making the Rolex of motorcycles I would let it go, but they don't.My Japanese imitation Rolex with quartz movement keeps better time, doesn't need winding/maintenance and was a lot cheaper. (no need to pick holes in this analogy, it's just an analogy)
It wasn't double the displacement and the bikes were still competitive.Have you forgotten Ducati having a displacement advantage in WSB for years? More cylinders can produce more power.
That is why I posted, to share my experiences with the "hardcore" Harley crowd.Don't forget that not everyone lives in the US so we don't deal with the same people everyday and don't build the same prejudices. Anyway, my original comment was related mainly to the poser comment, I don't have time to elaborate now, maybe later if I can be bothered.