When I said I found insulting a comparison between a Ferrari and a Corvette I didn't intend to sound out of the line, but I do consider it rather too much to say there's no difference between a Ferrari and a Corvette considering the history - both in the streets and on tracks - the segment to which each of these cars belong to, the interiors and quality, the efficiency of the motor, handling, suspension, etc.
Of course the Z06 handles very well, because it's meant to be and it's a track car, but if you compare it to the handling of other cars, such as a ferrari, it is poor. As I said, I really like the Z06 and I've followed it since it was released and it's a great car and a great improvement over the standard quality of previous models. In the case of a Ferrari, it isn't just a horsy badge, that badge means so much that basically sums up as the confidence of not having any mechanical problems or disturbances neither in a track nor in a day-by-day driving.
To finish this, I also consider it absurd if you revise the lap times of, say, the Ferrari 360 and the Z06 in the same track, driven by the same pilot (the Stig):
Ferrari 360 CS: 1.22.3
Corvette Z06: 1.22.4
Now consider this:
Ferrari 360 CS: 3.6 L, V8, 400 BHP
Z06: 7.0 L, V8, 505 BHP
For me, being a fraction faster than a car which has nearly half you CCs means efficiency and ability, that's basically all I have to say.
If you sum bits and bits, the 100,000 has an explanation, not only in the higher quality, but of course due to the fact that in a ferrari you pay exclusivity, uniqueness and the right to own that car. 8)