Goose+
Well-Known Member
10/10 for me; I haven't laughed so hard in months. Thank you Top Gear team for a lovely show 
Holy cow have you guys seen the comments people are making on the Guardian website? Let alone the article itself being based around a bunch of bloggers? Newspapers are becoming a joke, their reporting is done by Google pretty much these days.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/2009/aug/03/clarkson-hints-top-gear-over
In Brit-speak, "series" = "season". So consider this the season finale. (They'll be back in November sometime.)
I have one word to say about this episode: Strange.
I don't think it was that great. But it wasn't all bad either.
And some parts in the Aston Martin-film looked like it were filmed in front of a green-screen. I think it all was a bit strange..
If you have a series finale two or three times a year, what do you call the very final episode of the show, ever? The "show finale"? Do you not give it a title at all?
The "last episode".
2. I don't think the Internal Combustion Engine is done quite yet. Nor, for that matter is the Supercar. Yes, oil is getting scarce and what little is left is annoyingly located in all the messed up parts of the world. Yes, we're in a world overrun with self-righteous hippies and flat-shoed self-interest groups who want us to eat tofu and ride the bus instead of eat cow and drive our 5L twin turbo V8s. Yes, our leaders have panicked, and are pandering to these ecomentalists.
And yes, the car as we have known it for decades is about to change. Our town runabouts will soon sport electric motors, and our motorway repmobiles will have smaller, thriftier engines. Soon every regular car will be available as a "hybrid"... soon after it won't even be an option.
But supercars won't change so quickly. A supercar isn't about being PC. They're not about following the trends or doing what the government and self-interest groups want. They're not about miles per gallon or grams of CO2. Some series' ago TG themselves described supercars as loud, obnoxious beasts that should kill squirrels, reclaim the Falklands and consume all the world's oil. And they're absolutely right.
To drive a supercar is like flipping the bird to the rest of the world - it's a big, loud, hairy "fuck you" to Greenpeace in magnesium and carbon fibre. The rich people who buy Ferraris, Lamborghinis, Zondas, Astons and so on don't care if it costs ?1000 extra to tax a year just because too many carbon dioxides come out the tailpipe. They don't care if the car only gets 8 MPG and fuel's ?3 a litre. We care about that stuff, because we're not rich and it will be our Golf GTIs and other affordable fun cars that will be turned into electric 'transportation'. But the supercar will live on, so long as there are rich people who like cars.
There's also the minor fact that with a few simple changes, our engines can run on ethanol, which can never be depleted, grown just about anywhere, puts money in the pockets of our farmers instead of Arab sheiks and when that wonderful chemical reaction is complete and CO2 blasts its way out the exhaust, feel happy in the knowledge it will be absorbed by the plants that will be used to make the next litre of ethanol.
Of course, I might be wrong (it happened once, back in 1976...) so next time you're in your car, tell it you love it, and that you're happy its here. Maybe even go for a drive, just for the hell of it.
I say build the Geothermal Plants, use the excess Electricity to produce Hydrogen