a little suprised by the high numbers, but i think it's because everyone is seeing "real top gear" and are excited by it. completely understandable and i agree.
however, i think the show could have been aranged differently, they put the most entertaining video at the beginning which in my opinion should have been the 3rd review. they started the show off strong, then let it die down as opposed to the other way around.
jeremy in the X6 should have been first since it wasn't the best or worse review. i found it a bit monotinous after the 3rd or 4th time he "went to...." could have stopped on the 3rd one and it would have still been funny.
then do james's video second. in my opinion one of, if not the worst james review i've seen.... and i think he does the best reviews normally, but that one was weak for him, he could have played with the car more and like everyone else says, "ejector seat" the sign lady,she was dull.
then finish with hammond. interesting car, interesting aproach. high energy, very impacting. i'm not a fan of that type of cartoon, but it suited what was going on very well so if i were reviewing that review by itself i would have given a 10.
the cool wall was re-introduced, just not how we all wanted
SIARPC interesting guy. boring lap. nothing we can do about that though. (wonder what the next car will be)
awards, just like always.
i gave it an 8. pretty good, but a little lack lustre.