2010 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 vs. 2010 BMW S 1000 RR

JohnnyRacer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
3,527
Location
37.19/-93.28
http://www.insideline.com/bugatti/v...ugatti-veyron-16-4-vs-2010-bmw-s-1000-rr.html

First a few numbers.

2010 Bugatti Veyron 16.4: 1,001 horsepower, 253 mph.

2010 BMW S 1000 RR: 190 hp, 191 mph.

Oh, and then there are the price tags: $1.3 million for the Bugatti, a mere $14,295 for the BMW.

But at this moment, we're not worried about the numbers. All we can think about is the French supercar sitting behind us, buzzing like an impertinent bluebottle fly in the mirrors of the 2010 BMW S 1000 RR. And now it behooves us to unleash the BMW's inner demon and show this, this insect of a 2010 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 the true, grand order of nature.

That bikes are faster than cars.

Molsheim Fury
This sinewy forest road in France is blessed with the unexpected switchbacks and rolling swoops where you'd expect a sport bike ? any sport bike ? to shrug off the attentions of a car ? any car ? with complete contempt. We've spent almost 20 years riding countless examples of ever-faster, more powerful and better-handling motorcycles, and no mere car has ever gotten within snarling distance of a 1,000cc race replica on the road.

Yes, a handful of exotic cars constructed at bewildering expense from space-age composites and fueled by the sweat of virgins will give a modern sport bike a run on the track, but only for about as long as it takes the millionaire's four-wheel toy to melt its brakes, vaporize its gearbox and delaminate its tires.

But on the road, with oncoming traffic, bumps, blind corners and suicidal camber? Yes, the motorcycle is king and the rider is god. Always has been, always will be.

So we lean into the BMW S 1000 RR, drop a gear and pin the throttle. See...you...later.

Transformers
A familiar plaintive wail rises from the very trick Akrapovic exhaust system of the BMW S 1000 RR and pow! the bike is gone. Wide open, the quick-shift system popping in sync as each gear goes home. Move! Move! Go, go, go! The speedo rattles through numbers as the RR flits between the trees like the ghost of BMW Motorsport ? flick left, pick it up, pull it right, on the gas, work the revs. Nothing can live with this. Nothing.

It's to be expected, because this is no ordinary motorcycle. The combination of 190 hp at 13,200 rpm from the BMW's 999cc DOHC inline-4 and MotoGP-style electronic stability control have changed the expectations of what's possible with two wheels and a headlight.

Of course, the car in our mirrors is no ordinary car. The Bugatti Veyron 16.4 is finally reaching the end of its production run after 295 examples of the French-built (though Volkswagen-owned) supercar have been built since 2005. Even the most car-phobic motorcyclist knows about the quad-turbo 8.0-liter Bugatti W16 engine and its ability to deliver 1,001 hp and a top speed of 253 mph (a Veyron 16.4 Super Sport with its 1,183-hp engine recently set a top-speed mark of 268 mph).

In fact, this particular Bugatti Veyron 16.4 isn't being driven by a retired bus driver who has won the lottery but instead Pierre-Henri Raphanel, Bugatti's test-driver and a well-known shoe at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. (We wish we could afford his jet-set tan.)

Learning To Understand the Automobile
The Veyron isn't just a symbol of wanton excess; it's also a symbol of haute technology. Not only does it make more torque than the USS Enterprise (some 922 pound-feet of torque at 2,200 rpm, in fact), it uses sleek aerodynamics and aircraft-standard hardware, not to mention some fairly impressive electronics to keep it all glued to the road.

So as we flash down the road under a forest ceiling of green and blue, fighting the S 1000 RR as it wheelies and squirms under the argument those 190 hp are having with the pavement through a contact patch the same size as a Labrador retriever's nose, we see the Bugatti still in our mirrors.

If the Veyron had the same ratio of power-to-tire-contact-patch as the BMW, it would be delivering its stupendous power through only one of its massive rear tires. So while we're desperately trying to get the BMW upright and pointing between the trees so we can unload the engine's 83 lb-ft of torque at 9,750 rpm through the bike's 190/55ZR17 Metzeler Racetec rear tire, the Bugatti shooms around corners behind us, no sign of it even causing Raphanel a moment of sweat.

The Bugatti is indefatigable, inexhaustible and irrepressible.

Performance Profiles
On paper it's a close-run thing between the world's fastest car and the world's fastest street bike up to 140 mph.

In perfect conditions, BMW says the 455-pound S 1000 RR will get to 60 mph from a standstill in 3.0 seconds on the way to the quarter-mile in 10.2 seconds. You'll find that 100 mph comes up in 5.3 seconds while the speed is all over at 191 mph. Sure, bikes like the BMW K1300S and Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa might get to 60 mph quicker, but no street bike is faster in a straight line than the BMW S 1000 RR.

Matched against this, the 4,410-pound Veyron 16.4 puts its turbocharged W16 to good use with a quick-shifting, dual-clutch seven-speed automated manual transmission plus all-wheel drive, so it gets to 60 mph from a standstill in the same breathtaking 3.0 seconds and finds the quarter-mile in 10.2 seconds. The 100 mph mark is reached in 5.5 seconds and of course the car doesn't run out of steam until you get to 253 mph.

So in a straight line the car and bike are neck and neck off the start and up to around 140 mph, after which the Bugatti clears off into some netherworld of top speed where not even MotoGP bikes dare venture.

Breaking Free
None of which is helping us much here on the road. The car is clinging on like the world's classiest limpet and there's nothing that the Fastest Bike in the World can do about it.

That is, right up to the moment we come up behind another car. It's moving fast, but nowhere near the speed we're at. The bike is around it without thinking or blinking, like you do when you're riding a sport bike. But the Veyron? Ohhh, no sir, not this time.

Pierre-Henri has yet to lose a Veyron to the scenery despite crossing off more than 3,000 test-drives and he isn't about to start now. The Bugatti has the best brakes in the world ? 15.7-inch carbon-ceramic discs with eight-piston calipers at the front, not to mention a rear wing that turns into an airbrake in 0.4s and which generates more braking force on its own than a family hatchback does with its driver standing on the pedal. It all means the Veyron will stop from 250 mph in less than 10 seconds.

But despite this, you can still crash into things and the Veyron won't magically narrow itself to the width of a sport bike to let Raphanel slip past cars against oncoming traffic. So the car is the loser.

Let's Be Practical
At the top of the hill we come to a village and a 25-mph speed limit. Everyone hates speed humps, but that goes double for people who drive cars that don't have the ride height of an ant's quiff and a carbon-fiber ground-effect undertray worth more than a four-bedroom house. The Bugatti crawls over the bumps at 0.01 mph.

Then we stop for gasoline and the million-dollar Veyron is forced to drink from the same cup as the rest of us. In normal use it gets over 20 mpg, but this drops to below 5 mpg at full tilt. The best the BMW has done in our hands is 54 mpg; the worst, at a racetrack, is 25 mpg. The Bugatti drinks 26.4 gallons of unleaded and the Beemer takes 4.5 gallons.

The motorcycle also wins the competition when it comes to maintenance costs ? changing tires, anyway. There are only two tire-changing machines in the world capable of removing the Veyron's epically proportioned 265/680R20 front and 365/710R21 rear Michelin Pilot Sport Pax run-flat tires. One is here at Molsheim; the other is in the U.S.. It costs $90,000 ? no, really ? to change four tires. And if you want to know what it costs to service the Veyron or change a windshield, don't ask.

Practical Magic
Now we're back on the road again, and you have to hand it to the Bugatti ? it's got a hell of a presence. Everyone stares at it. But it's all a fantasy ? a flimsy veil draped over reality. Even if you can afford a 2010 Bugatti Veyron 16.4, you then need extraordinary circumstances to use it. It's no track car ? even Pierre-Henri admits it only took a single demonstration lap at Le Mans to melt the Veyron's brakes.

Sure, the Bugatti might be able to live with the 2010 BMW S 1000 RR on a twisty road and even waste it on a straight one, but it never works out like that in the real world. One you chuck in traffic, road construction, speed bumps, curbs and even the length of gas stops, there's no way in which our bike can't beat his car.

And here's the thing. With a motorcycle, we get our performance kicks every morning on the way to work. And you, whoever you are in Veyron world, we bet you don't.

As we pack up at the end of the day and strap our luggage rack to the back of the BMW, we realize that the S 1000 RR even has more storage capacity than the Veyron 16.4. Ha! Bike wins again. Who'd have thought it?

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_9071012_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907106_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907107_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907104_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907108_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907109_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907102_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_9071011_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907101_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907103_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_907105_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_group_fe_9071010_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_eng_fe_907101_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_det_fe_907101_1600.jpg

2010_bugatti_veyron_cc_fe_907101_1600.jpg
 
I usually don't like bike vs. cars tests. They forgot to mention that in a crash on a bike you die in car not that often. The more valid point is yes you can get adrenalin kicks that matches the veyron/ are even better for a hole lot less. But I don't think some car/bike enthusiast bought something that can just go really fast in a straight line, or even around cornes. What matters most is how it make you fell. Bikes and cars I think have equal advantages and disadvantages.

But it comes down to what you like, you may get your kick from an mx-5,125cmc bike, a veyron or a 1,000 bike.

Ok I should stop now, because that wasn't the point of the actual test, it's just me ranting.
 
Yes, CrazyJeeper is remarkably active for someone who is dead. :p And by those standards, I have been killed to death at least twice and more like eight times. Guess it is possible to post from the afterlife. :p
 
Last edited:
Yes, there are apparently a lot of dead people posting in this thread and on this forum in general. :p The afterlife does have Internet!
 
Naw comparing the Veyron to, say a Mercedes E-Class is apples and oranges... This is more like apples and heroin.
 
Naw comparing the Veyron to, say a Mercedes E-Class is apples and oranges... This is more like apples and heroin.
Mmmm.... heroin.

I want to see them do a proper comparison like that bike with a Hayabusa swapped Caterham or the V8 Atom. Also want to see them do that test in rainy weather and see who comes out on top.

Bikes are awesome and so are cars but car generally has more use cases than a bike no matter the car or the bike.

To top it off the Veyron is a very silly car, its meant to be a luxury car that you can live with on the daily basis while still being able to go faster than is practical anywhere but some Arizona highways.

To the riders on the forum who have been in an accident and survived/were relatively unharmed:
You have to admit that even a fender bender in a bike will cause you more harm than in a car, also the potential for a lethality or major damage is quite a bit higher on a motorcycle, simply due to lack of any enclosure
 
Last edited:
As an aside:

BMW, symmetry is pretty cool. You should use it on your bikes.
 
From experience crashing a bicycle, I can tell you that an accident at any amount of speed on or in any vehicle at more than about 35mph is going to mess you up. If you like statistics, both cars and motorcycles leave you with a good chance of dying in a 50mph impact (and no, an accident that began at 50mph and ended with you stopping abruptly at or below 15mph doesn't count).

This article was kind of dumb, as the BMW is only fastest in top speed because other bikes are limited to 186mph from the factory. There are faster accelerating 1000cc (and probably faster top speed capable) bikes.
 
This article was kind of dumb, as the BMW is only fastest in top speed because other bikes are limited to 186mph from the factory.

Comprehension, embrace it.

Apparently you're talking about yourself here? I'm not much for fighting with someone who feels like being a jerk on the internet. There are plenty of motorcycles that would have much higher top speeds if they weren't limited.
 
Apparently you're talking about yourself here? I'm not much for fighting with someone who feels like being a jerk on the internet. There are plenty of motorcycles that would have much higher top speeds if they weren't limited.

I quoted the wrong part of your post.

(and probably faster top speed capable)
 
I quoted the wrong part of your post.

To be fair they are talking about stock vs stock street bikes. In that context the BMW does have the highest top speed, for all you know its also speed limited and is actually capable of higher speeds.
 
Top