Lev, I can respect your reasons for disliking/critiquing Clinton, but I don't understand or support your justification of Trump.
Liberals are foaming at the mouth when it comes to Trump to the point where they will argue against anything and everything he says or does just out of spite - this is stupid, short-sighted, and immature.
I am no fan of the Donald but in terms of immigration:
-He wants to deport all illegals - I disagree with this.
-He wants to build a wall - I think this is useless without addressing other issues, which is something Gary Johnson is much better on.
-He wants to make Mexico pay for the wall - I think that if we're actually building this thing, then it would be possible to make Mexico pay for it one way or another.
This isn't really support or justification of Trump. This is just looking at the issue objectively.
1. Even if we disregard the obvious issue with gender, what does Trump mean by looking presidential? And then he immediately follows it with "you have to get the job done." So only people who look presidential (whatever the fuck that means) can get the job done? It's all about appearances?
You're not going to score any points with me by bringing up bullshit gender issues (again) - what's next, the made up gender wage gap?
Moving on...
This man looks "presidential":
This man looks like a fool:
Got it? No? Ok, let's try again.
Presidential:
Fool:
2. Trump is speculating about what could have/would have happened if Clinton went to Mexico.
And Hillary is speculating that Trump would lead us to nuclear war. What is your point?
This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes because it's not hard to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin.
3. What exactly was the big success of that meeting in Mexico?
You can't expect him to come out and say that it was unsuccessful, can you? Come on...