Cobol74
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Messages
- 17,506
- Location
- The banana republic of Ukania
- Car(s)
- Honda Accord 2.2 i-Dtec Sport Estate.Hyundai Ix20
Trump and Hillary - bugger.
This is spot-on. Trump is terrible, absolutely terrible. But at least he is not a corrupt, lying, stealing, conniving traitor.Trump is the worst possible choice for president, except for Hillary.
This is spot-on. Trump is terrible, absolutely terrible. But at least he is not a corrupt, lying, stealing, conniving traitor.
Good.He has never held elected office.
The first thing that pops into people's heads when they think of Hillary is "liar". Followed by "dishonest", "untrustworthy", and "criminal".But he's still a lying...
What has Trump stolen? Meanwhile, the Clintons literally stole from the White House....stealing...
Aside from the Trump University crap, how is he even remotely a fraudster?... conniving fraudster.
"OVERBLOWN"And while most frontline US politicians are corrupt to a certain degree, Clintons corrupt nature has been so overblown it's laughable.
No, she is a fucking traitor. She knowingly ignored the law and exposed top secret information. It's too bad that the Obama-controlled DoJ won't let the FBI off the leash, nor will they charge her. Lynch is as corrupt as any of them.And she's not a traitor, at worst, she's been very stupid over the e-mails.
You're probably right. Still better than Hillary though. By a long shot.He's never been in charge of serious matters.
...
Every single piece of information known about mr. Trump indicates he would be an absolute disaster if given any power what-so-ever.
I hope we do give him a chance.He hasn't really had the chance. Just let him try. You'll see.
Uhh what? He has been very, very successful. What are you talking about?He's been disastrous enough as a businessman, please don't give him nukes and an army.
As far as I can read from your posts, you despise Clinton out of principle because she allegedly broke laws (while in office) and paint her with the term "traitor" because of that. But a traitor is someone who knowingly and with full intend works against his own country and for an enemy. I really don't see that in Clinton's case. So what actual damage to the US has she caused?Still better than Hillary though. By a long shot.
She knowingly violated federal security laws, thus exposing top secret information. This wasn't a little honest mistake with no repercussions - she knew what she was doing when she put the safety of the nation at risk.As far as I can read from your posts, you despise Clinton out of principle because she allegedly broke laws (while in office) and paint her with the term "traitor" because of that. But a traitor is someone who knowingly and with full intend works against his own country and for an enemy. I really don't see that in Clinton's case. So what actual damage to the US has she caused?
Yeah. An impressive job's been done to paint her as some despicable figure of evil and lies. It's quite incredible. Not really accurate to that extent, though. Although she's done her share of lying, she's a politician, after all.The first thing that pops into people's heads when they think of Hillary is "liar". Followed by "dishonest", "untrustworthy", and "criminal".
Okay, I'll cede that. he's just run away from bills and local businesses, among other places in Atlantic city.What has Trump stolen? Meanwhile, the Clintons literally stole from the White House.
That's plenty. He's allegedly a billionaire, even so he had time to defraud normal working people. Wouldn't trust him with a piggy bank for five minutes.Aside from the Trump University crap, how is he even remotely a fraudster?
It has. She's been made out as this arch crook, the personification of corruption and dishonesty. And to be honest, she is not."OVERBLOWN"
That might be criminal, but it is not treason. That's just pundit bullshit.No, she is a fucking traitor. She knowingly ignored the law and exposed top secret information.
Or, perhaps, there's not enough evidence to convict. I've been told every week since perhaps March it's only a matter of time until Clinton is charged. Still hasn't been.It's too bad that the Obama-controlled DoJ won't let the FBI off the leash, nor will they charge her. Lynch is as corrupt as any of them.
He is the most dangerous man ever become a major party candidate for the office of president of the United States of America. He doesn't have the experience to be president. He doesn't have the mental capacity to be president. He doesn't have the psychology to be president. Frankly, his tenure as a businessman prove beyond any doubt that he should never be given any power at all.You're probably right. Still better than Hillary though. By a long shot.
He doesn't even deserve being the nominee.I hope we do give him a chance.
He's been close to personal bankruptcy. Not to mention the bankruptcies his companies have declared. Back in the early 90s, he was put on a tight budget of just 400.000 a month back in those days.Uhh what? He has been very, very successful. What are you talking about?
I guess some people can't see the forest for the trees.Yeah. An impressive job's been done to paint her as some despicable figure of evil and lies. It's quite incredible. Not really accurate to that extent, though.
Slightly off-topic: I use a pocket holster to carry concealed at work, which means one less pocket to utilize for other things. I hate having anything in my back pants pockets too. In the winter I got by with a jacket or vest with pockets, or a few times I carried inside the waistband and covered the gun with a sweater. Anyways, now that summer is in full swing, I am very short on pocket space. Yet I still manage - I carry my phone and car keys in my hand because I have nowhere else to put them. Yet Hillary Clinton couldn't fit a second device into her purse or handbag? Oh please!... her excuse is that she "didn't want to carry two devices."
Bullshit. She won't even carry her own bags, while in the White House she tried to treat her security detail like bellhops; her excuse is that she won't make her aid carry a Blackberry?
Fun fact: I had an internship at the Clinton Foundation back in college. Even in my bottom-feeder position I saw some sketchy stuff. Got a picture with Bill Clinton out of it though :lol:Then we can start looking at the Clinton Foundation slush fund.
That's not true at all! The Clintons were broke! BROKE I TELL YA!She has maintained she "took what was offered" for her Wall Street speaking engagements, but we now know that the banks actually negotiated her down from her $300,000 demand for a 20 minute speech - she settled for about a quarter-million dollars, five-star accommodations for her and her entourage, and a private jet no smaller than a Gulf Stream 450 (or larger); oh, and demands that no record other than a single transcript be kept of the speech, which would be handed over only to her and not released. All this while speaking publicly about getting corrupt money out of politics.
Hillary Clinton said:...we came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt. We had no money when we got there and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages for houses, for Chelsea's education, you know, it was not easy.
I disagree entirely, so far she has suffered no political consequences, no legal consequences, and has smugly defected or refused to address a growing mountain of evidence. She won't toe the line, if anything, she will be even more brazen in her flaunting of laws and regulations.
Her use of the private email server was a calculated move to subvert US law regarding federal documents, the Federal Records Act. She knew that her emails were subject to the FRA and FOIA and simply refused to comply with the laws and regulations regarding the handling of federal papers. Moreover, she refused to follow the law regarding the handling of Secret and Top Secret documents and has been playing games in the media by saying, "No documents were stamped 'Top Secret'". Of course they fucking weren't, that only happens in the movies! Secret and Top Secret documents aren't scanned in with a big red stamp on them; she's playing games. We know that the entire fucking State department had to disable most of their security just to accommodate Secretary Clinton - and her excuse is that she "didn't want to carry two devices."
Bullshit. She won't even carry her own bags, while in the White House she tried to treat her security detail like bellhops; her excuse is that she won't make her aid carry a Blackberry?
Then we can start looking at the Clinton Foundation slush fund. I can't even begin to scratch the surface of that cesspool, but there is evidence that they accepted donations from Saudi Arabia and arms dealers as defacto brokerage fees for allowing the sales of arms and other material. She was the Secretary of State and accepting illegal political contributions and bribes to grease the rails for foreign powers to acquire US arms and ammunition. That is fucking treason! The Clinton Foundation has also payed out hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to the Clinton's personal political character-assassin who has been in their employ since before Bill got sucked off in the Oval Office. Sidney Blumenthal is the same guy who proposed using photos of Bin Laden's corpse in debt-ceiling negotiations.
She stood in front of a nation while the bodies of our diplomats and security in Benghazi were still warm and said that the attack was the result of a mob angry over a movie; this was a complete fabrication as we now know. In fact, she was so busy trying to spin it to the media that her department was actually delaying rescue efforts. She fabricated a story about taking sniper fire when there is fucking video of her walking out of the plane and being greeted by a child. She has tried to re-write her own history by saying she has "always opposed" the TPP, when she is on-record (and video) supporting it - not only supporting the TPP, she helped negotiate and draft the fucking thing! She has maintained she "took what was offered" for her Wall Street speaking engagements, but we now know that the banks actually negotiated her down from her $300,000 demand for a 20 minute speech - she settled for about a quarter-million dollars, five-star accommodations for her and her entourage, and a private jet no smaller than a Gulf Stream 450 (or larger); oh, and demands that no record other than a single transcript be kept of the speech, which would be handed over only to her and not released. All this while speaking publicly about getting corrupt money out of politics.
Speaking of corruption, she and the DNC had already decided that HRC was going to be the nominee before the first primary. The Gucifer 2.0 hack showed close collusion between the DNC and the HRC campaign.
This is not a single "woopsie" mistake, she has an established behavioral pattern of ignoring rules and regulations, and lying on a grand scale for personal profit.
"As you know we had another suicide bombing, Istanbul, Turkey," he said. "Many, many people killed. Many, many people injured. Folks, there's something going on that's really, really bad. Alright. It's bad. And we better get smart, and we better get tough or we're not going to have much of a country left, OK? It's bad. Terrible."
That's not true at all! The Clintons were broke! BROKE I TELL YA!