Not if there is SS not letting people near it
They're already near. All shoppers in their have their bags checked. Street is closed/regulated. Full of police.
Not if there is SS not letting people near it
I don't see a problem with him spending time at his home. Ivanka's presence at Trump's meeting with Abe is suspicious. I wouldn't be surprised if we have another Billygate.
Is that real? It's almost parody.
[...]Spencer has stated that he rejects the description of white supremacist, and describes himself as an identitarian. Both Spencer and others have said that he created the term "Alt-right," a term he considers a movement about white identity
Meanwhile, his fans had a gathering, in which apparently they missed the "for everyone" part:
[video=youtube;1o6-bi3jlxk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o6-bi3jlxk[/video]
While white nationalist fringe elements do exist (and always have), I don't think that they embody the "alt-right". I see the alt-right as conservatives who are sick and tired of the GOP so they supported Trump. Shit media is, once again, spreading BS.
The organisation does exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Policy_Institute
As well as the guy in the video
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer
I'm not defending those guys at all. I'm just saying that the alt-right that I've come across isn't like that at all. This reminds me of when the left rallied against the Tea Party a decade ago without understanding what it is - same with the alt-right. White nationalists are white nationalists, neo-Nazis are neo-Nazis, and the alt-right is the alt-right. You're painting with a stupidly broad brush when making the implication that the alt-right is nothing but a bunch of racists (i.e. the usual progressive Trump card). Again, there are certainly xenophobic fringes but the media has done a fantastic job fooling you into thinking that all Trump supporters are like that - 99% aren't even close! Just stop the "all Trump supporters are racists" bullshit already.
Were you not suggesting that the racists and xenophobes aren't just a fringe minority among those that support Trump but rather a more widespread issue? Because it seems to me like you're basically telling us "racists seem to all support Trump... not saying there's a connection or anything, but just figured I'd point it out... A lot of Trump's fans are racists... Ya know, just sayin' without implying anything".Find one post where I said this.
Such as? The left does almost entirely support PC, which is directly connected to the growing-but-currently-minority SJW group, as well as fanning the fumes of racial, religious, sexual, etc flames. The vast majority of Democrats really are ignorant when it comes to firearms - otherwise they wouldn't be supporting the party that says stupid stuff to try and ban them. What have I said that was a vast generalization and inaccurate? That's a serious question btw - I know I can be a hypocrite sometimes without realizing it so I actually would like to know when I've painted with a broad brush.Then answer my question - how come you can paint with a broad brush about the left, but when people do that about the right it's not fair?
Such as? The left does almost entirely support PC, which is directly connected to the growing-but-currently-minority SJW group, as well as fanning the fumes of racial, religious, sexual, etc flames. The vast majority of Democrats really are ignorant when it comes to firearms - otherwise they wouldn't be supporting the party that says stupid stuff to try and ban them. What have I said that was a vast generalization and inaccurate? That's a serious question btw - I know I can be a hypocrite sometimes without realizing it so I actually would like to know when I've painted with a broad brush.
Were you not suggesting that the racists and xenophobes aren't just a fringe minority among those that support Trump but rather a more widespread issue? Because it seems to me like you're basically telling us "racists seem to all support Trump... not saying there's a connection or anything, but just figured I'd point it out... A lot of Trump's fans are racists... Ya know, just sayin' without implying anything".
The bolded part is basically correct, though "shit happens" seems to imply that I don't view these problems as problems; of course we should try to think of ways to stop police shootings - I just don't think that racism is the issue there so we're sort of looking at the problem from the wrong angle.You use the labels left, PC, SJW to say something abstract about "fanning the fumes of racial, religious, sexual, etc flames." In doing so you kind of ignore individual incidents, saying that we blow them out of proportion. For example, the way I understand it, your position is that one rape joke, or one black kid murdered by cops are not indicative of larger issues in society. Shit happens, right?
But you have grown to hate PC and SJW out of principle, so even when they do have a legitimate claim, you dismiss it or ignore by slapping those labels.
Don't you think that the rhetoric comes off as strongly suggestive? Isn't this similar to saying "all of these terrorists are Muslim... Hmm... How interesting... Wonder why that is, eh? Wink wink, nudge nudge"? There certainly appears to be an underlying implication that Muslim = terrorist, just like there seems to be an implication that Trump supporter = alt-right = racists/xenophobes/etc. At least that's what it sounds like to me, I could be wrong.The evidence seems to be stacking up. But there is a difference between saying "all Trump supporters are racists" (which you said I claimed, yet I didn't), and the statement that "racists tend to support Trump" (my actual claim and the supporting evidence).
And this is an example of why I said I refuse to talk about US politics with passion. Keep fighting each other while they go home and enjoy their day. But again, I digress.
Trump won't pursue e-mail case against Clinton
... any sane person knew it was a political stunt. All I can do is laugh at the people that thought they were going to get pleasure out of it.